Literature DB >> 34772847

Characterization and Development of Universal Ventricular Assist Device: Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis of Advanced Design.

Mark S Goodin1, Michael S Showalter2, David J Horvath3, Barry D Kuban4, Christine R Flick4, Anthony R Polakowski4, Kiyotaka Fukamachi4,5, Jamshid H Karimov4,5.   

Abstract

We are developing a universal, advanced ventricular assist device (AVAD) with automatic pressure regulation suitable for both left and right ventricular support. The primary goal of this computational fluid dynamics (CFD) study was to analyze the biventricular performance of the AVAD across its wide range of operating conditions. An AVAD CFD model was created and validated using in vitro hydraulic performance measurements taken over conditions spanning both left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and right ventricular assist device (RVAD) operation. Static pressure taps, placed throughout the pump, were used to validate the CFD results. The CFD model was then used to assess the change in hydraulic performance with varying rotor axial positions and identify potential design improvements. The hydraulic performance was simulated and measured at rotor speeds from 2,300 to 3,600 revolutions/min and flow rates from 2.0 to 8.0 L/min. The CFD-predicted hydraulic pressure rise agreed well with the in vitro measured data, within 6.5% at 2300 rpm and within 3.5% for the higher rotor speeds. The CFD successfully predicted wall static pressures, matching experimental values within 7%. High degree of similarity and circumferential uniformity in the pump's flow fields were observed over the pump operation as an LVAD and an RVAD. A secondary impeller axial clearance reduction resulted in a 10% decrease in peak flow residence time and lower static pressures on the secondary impeller. These lower static pressures suggest a reduction in the upwards rotor forces from the secondary impeller and a desired increase in the pressure sensitivity of the pump. The CFD analyses supported the feasibility of the proposed AVAD's use as an LVAD or an RVAD, over a wide range of operating conditions. The CFD results demonstrated the operability of the pump in providing the desired circumferential flow similarity over the intended range of flow/speed conditions and the intended functionality of the AVAD's automated pressure regulation.
Copyright © ASAIO 2021.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34772847      PMCID: PMC9085974          DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   3.826


  31 in total

1.  Fluid mechanics of arterial stenosis: relationship to the development of mural thrombus.

Authors:  D Bluestein; L Niu; R T Schoephoerster; M K Dewanjee
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  In vitro hemodynamic characterization of HeartMate II at 6000 rpm: Implications for weaning and recovery.

Authors:  Gengo Sunagawa; Nicole Byram; Jamshid H Karimov; David J Horvath; Nader Moazami; Randall C Starling; Kiyotaka Fukamachi
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 3.  Assessment and treatment of right ventricular failure.

Authors:  Marc A Simon
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Preoperative risk factors for right ventricular failure after implantable left ventricular assist device insertion.

Authors:  K Fukamachi; P M McCarthy; N G Smedira; R L Vargo; R C Starling; J B Young
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Morbidity and mortality in heart transplant candidates supported with mechanical circulatory support: is reappraisal of the current United network for organ sharing thoracic organ allocation policy justified?

Authors:  Omar Wever-Pinzon; Stavros G Drakos; Abdallah G Kfoury; Jose N Nativi; Edward M Gilbert; Melanie Everitt; Rami Alharethi; Kim Brunisholz; Feras M Bader; Dean Y Li; Craig H Selzman; Josef Stehlik
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Implantable continuous-flow right ventricular assist device: lessons learned in the development of a cleveland clinic device.

Authors:  Kiyotaka Fukamachi; Akira Shiose; Alex L Massiello; David J Horvath; Leonard A R Golding; Sangjin Lee; Randall C Starling
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Late right heart failure during support with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices adversely affects post-transplant outcome.

Authors:  Koji Takeda; Hiroo Takayama; Paolo C Colombo; Ulrich P Jorde; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Shinichi Fukuhara; Donna M Mancini; Yoshifumi Naka
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  The global health and economic burden of hospitalizations for heart failure: lessons learned from hospitalized heart failure registries.

Authors:  Andrew P Ambrosy; Gregg C Fonarow; Javed Butler; Ovidiu Chioncel; Stephen J Greene; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Savina Nodari; Carolyn S P Lam; Naoki Sato; Ami N Shah; Mihai Gheorghiade
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Temporary right ventricular mechanical support in high-risk left ventricular assist device recipients versus permanent biventricular or total artificial heart support.

Authors:  Antonio Loforte; Alexander Stepanenko; Evgenij V Potapov; Francesco Musumeci; Nikolay Dranishnikov; Martin Schweiger; Andrea Montalto; Miralem Pasic; Yuguo Weng; Michael Dandel; Henryk Siniawski; Marian Kukucka; Thomas Krabatsch; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.094

Review 10.  Left ventricular vs. biventricular mechanical support: Decision making and strategies for avoidance of right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Michael Dandel; Thomas Krabatsch; Volkmar Falk
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.164

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.