| Literature DB >> 34772743 |
Jian Li1, Kaiqiang Zhang1, Zhenfu Lu2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The present study investigated the prevalence and factors contributing to dental caries in 12-15-year-old adolescents in northeast China to provide information for dental caries promotion programmes. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional survey including caries examination and questionnaire was performed in Liaoning province, China. 3731 12-15-year-old school adolescents participated in the survey. School adolescents were randomly selected and received a clinical oral examination and completed questionnaires that assessed their oral health-related behaviours and attitudes.Entities:
Keywords: epidemiology; health policy; oral medicine
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34772743 PMCID: PMC8593713 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044758
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1The flowchart of sample selection.
The distributions and numbers of the studied adolescents in Liaoning Province
| Area | City | Numbers of school selected | Male | Female | Total |
| Urban | Shenyang | 3 | 436 (11.68%) | 452 (12.11%) | 1841 (49.34%) |
| Jinzhou | 3 | 473 (12.68%) | 480 (12.87%) | ||
| Rural | Donggang | 3 | 469 (12.57%) | 466 (12.49%) | 1890 (50.66%) |
| Zhuanghe | 3 | 481 (12.89%) | 471 (12.62%) | ||
| Total | 12 | 1859 (49.82%) | 1872 (50.17%) | 3731 |
The prevalence of dental caries, rate of pit and fissure sealant and mean value of DMFT with different districts and genders
| Group | N | Pit and fissure sealant (%) | DT | MT | FT | DMFT | Caries frequency | |||||||
| X±SD | t/F | P value | Effect size | Percentage (%) | χ2 | P value | Effect size | |||||||
| Area | Urban | 1841 | 22 | 0.54±1.17* | 0.01 | 0.64±1.42* | 1.19±1.87* | −11.67 | <0.001 | 0.187 | 45.68* | 92.36 | <0.001 | 0.161 |
| Rural | 1890 | 9 | 1.62±2.41 | 0.01 | 0.45±1.24 | 2.08±2.73 | 61.37 | |||||||
| Age | 12 | 769 | 19 | 0.84±1.55* | 0.01 | 0.48±1.12* | 1.33±1.90 | 0.001 | 51.23 | 6.398 | >0.05 | 0.044 | ||
| 13 | 1082 | 18 | 1.18±2.16 | 0.01 | 0.46±1.43 | 1.64±2.42 | 4.295 | <0.05 | 52.03 | |||||
| 14 | 950 | 13 | 1.04±1.92 | 0.01 | 0.64±1.58 | 1.69±2.47 | 54.52 | |||||||
| 15 | 930 | 13 | 1.23±2.09 | 0.01 | 0.61±1.43 | 1.85±2.57 | 56.55 | |||||||
| Gender | Male | 1859 | 13 | 0.90±1.74* | 0.01 | 0.39±1.01* | 1.29±2.02* | −9.12 | <0.001 | 0.147 | 47.87* | 49.37 | <0.001 | 0.118 |
| Female | 1872 | 18 | 1.28±2.17 | 0.01 | 0.71±1.58 | 1.99±2.65 | 59.34 | |||||||
| Total | 3731 | 16 | 1.09±1.97 | 0.01 | 0.55±1.34 | 1.64±2.38 | 53.63 | |||||||
DMFT, decayed–missing–filled teeth; FT, filled teeth; MT, missing teeth.
Figure 2(A) The prevalence of dental caries in different tooth position in the upper and lower jaws. (B) Comparison of pit and fissure sealant rate (PFT), dental caries prevalence (DCP), decayed teeth (DT), filled teeth (FT) and decayed–missing–filled teeth (DMFT) between Liaoning Province (LN) and China (CHN). DT, decayed teeth; LN, liaoning; PFS, Pit and fissure sealant.
The caries rate of adolescents corresponding to various sweets and oral hygiene habits
| Group | N (%) | Dental caries | |||
| DMFT (SD) | t/F | P value | |||
| Toothbrush habits | ≥2/d | 1301 (38.43%) | 1.58±2.36 | −7.15 | >0.05 |
| <2/d | 2084 (61.57%) | 1.64±2.36 | |||
| Use of dental floss | No | 2987 (80.04%) | 1.65±2.40 | 1.004 | >0.05 |
| Occasionally | 644 (17.26%) | 1.66±2.34 | |||
| Every week | 48 (1.29%) | 1.58±2.49 | |||
| Every day | 52 (1.39%) | 1.08±1.63 | |||
| Desserts and candies | ≥2 times/day | 493 (13.21%) | 1.81±2.51 | 7.946 | <0.001 |
| ≥2 times/week | 1657 (44.41%) | 1.76±2.45 | |||
| <2 times/week | 1581 (42.37%) | 1.46±2.24 | |||
| Carbonated drinks | ≥2 times/day | 226 (6.06%) | 1.80±2.74 | 3.141 | <0.05 |
| ≥2 times/week | 1103 (29.56%) | 1.77±2.28 | |||
| <2 times/week | 2402 (64.38%) | 1.57±2.38 | |||
| Sugared drinks | ≥2 times/day | 302 (8.09%) | 1.62±2.32 | 1.459 | >0.05 |
| ≥2 times/week | 1464 (39.24%) | 1.72±2.41 | |||
| <2 times/week | 1965 (52.67%) | 1.59±2.36 | |||
DMFT, decayed–missing–filled teeth.
Figure 3(A) Use of toothpaste. (A) Yes: 98.4. (B) No: 0.4. (C) Unkonwn: 0.9. (B) Use of toothpaste use. (A) Yes: 11.1. (B) No: 9.8. (C) Unknown: 79.1.
Figure 4(A)The percentage of time from the last dental visit. (A) Less than 6 months: 30.2. (B) 6–12 months: 27.6. (C) More than 12 months: 42.2. (B) The purpose of last dental visit in 12 months. (A) Consult and examination: 19.9. (B) Prevention: 19.2. (C) Treatment: 49.8. (D) Others: 11.1.
The percentage of response on questions of oral health knowledges and attitudes
| Liaoning Province | Urban | Rrual | X2 | P value | Effect | |||||||
| Agree N (%) | Disagree N (%) | Unknown N (%) | Agree N (%) | Disagree N (%) | Unknown N (%) | Agree N (%) | Disagree N (%) | Unknown N (%) | ||||
| Oral health awareness | ||||||||||||
| 1.Gum bleeding is normal when brushing your teeth | 551 (14.80) | 2635 (70.51) | 545 (14.69) | 212 (11.51) | 1372 (74.52) | 257 (13.95) | 339 (17.93) | 1263 (66.82) | 288 (15.23) | 34.91 | <0.001 | 0.097 |
| 2. Bacteria are one of the causes of inflammation of the gums | 2841 (76.13) | 234 (6.30) | 656 (17.57) | 1423 (77.29) | 110 (5.97) | 308 (16.73) | 1418 (75.02) | 124 (6.56) | 348 (18.41) | 2.642 | 0.267 | 0.027 |
| 3. Cleaning your teeth is not useful for preventing inflammation of the gums | 288 (7.74) | 2830 (75.92) | 613 (16.34) | 144 (7.82) | 1405 (76.31) | 292 (15.86) | 144 (7.61) | 1425 (75.39) | 321 (16.40) | 0.87 | 0.647 | 0.015 |
| 4. Dental caries are caused by bacteria on teeth | 2278 (61.10) | 384 (10.34) | 1069 (28.57) | 1206 (68.44) | 180 (9.8) | 455 (24.71) | 1072 (58.22) | 204 (11.08) | 614 (33.35) | 32.39 | <0.001 | 0.093 |
| 5. Sweets can lead to dental caries | 2798 (75.12) | 299 (8.30) | 634 (16.58) | 1449 (78.70) | 140 (7.60) | 252 (13.69) | 1349 (73.75) | 159 (8.41) | 382 (20.21) | 30.80 | <0.001 | 0.091 |
| 6. Fluoride is useless to dental protection | 204 (5.55) | 1853 (49.72) | 1674 (44.73) | 99 (5.37) | 951 (51.65) | 791 (42.96) | 105 (5.55) | 902 (47.72) | 883 (46.71) | 5.886 | 0.053 | 0.04 |
| 7. Pit and fissure sealant can prevent dental caries of adolescents | 1558 (41.82) | 479 (12.81) | 1694 (45.37) | 967 (52.52) | 185 (10.04) | 689 (37.42) | 591 (31.26) | 294 (15.55) | 1005 (53.17) | 173.87 | <0.001 | 0.216 |
| 8.Oral diseases can cause or exacerbate certain systemic diseases | 2219 (59.54) | 431 (11.45) | 1081 (29.01) | 1088 (59.09) | 213 (11.57) | 54 029.33 | 1131 (59.84) | 218 (11.50) | 541 (28.62) | 0.249 | 0.883 | 0.008 |
| Oral health attitudes | ||||||||||||
| 1.Oral health is important to life | 3473 (93.18) | 30 (0.71) | 228 (6.11) | 1699 (92.28) | 13 (0.71) | 129 (7.01) | 1774 (93.8) | 17 (0.89) | 99 (5.23) | 5.68 | 0.128 | 0.039 |
| 2. Regular oral examination is necessary | 2829 (75.81 | 82 (2.28) | 820 (21.92) | 1383 (75.12) | 37 (1.68) | 421 (22.87) | 1446 (76.5) | 45 (2.38) | 399 (22.27) | 2.24 | 0.524 | 0.024 |
| 3. Teeth are born good or bad, no correlation with the protection | 186 (5.04) | 3333 (89.32) | 212 (5.64) | 92 (4.99) | 1629 (88.48) | 120 (6.51) | 94 (4.97) | 1704 (90.15) | 92 (4.86) | 4.804 | 0.187 | 0.036 |
| 4. We should rely mainly on ourselves to prevent oral diseases | 3448 (92.41) | 84 (2.35) | 199 (5.24) | 1695 (92.06) | 36 (1.95) | 110 (5.97) | 1753 (92.7) | 48 (2.53) | 89 (4.71) | 4.441 | 0.218 | 0.034 |
Binary logistic regression analysis for the dental caries status of adolescents
| Variable | b | SE |
| df | P | OR | 95% CI | |
| L | U | |||||||
| Constant | −2.434 | 0.489 | 24.823 | 1 | <0.001 | – | – | – |
| Gender | 0.502 | 0.067 | 55.802 | 1 | <0.001 | 1.653 | 1.449 | 1.885 |
| Age | 0.066 | 0.033 | 3.949 | 1 | 0.047 | 1.068 | 1.001 | 1.139 |
| Father’s education level | ||||||||
| Median | −0.171 | 0.087 | 3.854 | 1 | 0.050 | 0.843 | 0.711 | 1.000 |
| High | −0.239 | 0.092 | 6.707 | 1 | <0.001 | 0.788 | 0.658 | 0.944 |
| Area | 0.573 | 0.074 | 59.683 | 1 | <0.001 | 1.774 | 1.534 | 2.052 |
The prevalence of dental caries, rate of pit and fissure sealant and mean value of DMFT with different districts and genders
| Group | N (%) | Dental caries | |||
| DMFT (SD) | t/F | P value | |||
| Sibling | Have | 1240 (33.24%) | 1.86±2.57 | −3.952 | <0.001 |
| Do not have | 2491 (66.76%) | 1.53±2.27 | |||
| Father’s education background | Low (junior school or below) | 2055 (55.08%) | 1.83±2.46 | 15.88 | <0.001 |
| Median (senior school) | 880 (23.59%) | 1.49±2.35 | |||
| High (college or above) | 796 (21.33%) | 1.32±2.14 | |||
| Mother’s education background | Low (junior school or below) | 2051 (54.97%) | 1.85±2.49 | 18.36 | <0.001 |
| Median (senior school) | 902 (24.18%) | 1.49±2.31 | |||
| High (college or above) | 778 (20.85%) | 1.29±2.07 | |||
DMFT, decayed–missing–filled teeth.