Literature DB >> 34772649

Characteristics of publicly available skin cancer image datasets: a systematic review.

David Wen1, Saad M Khan2, Antonio Ji Xu3, Hussein Ibrahim4, Luke Smith5, Jose Caballero5, Luis Zepeda5, Carlos de Blas Perez5, Alastair K Denniston6, Xiaoxuan Liu7, Rubeta N Matin8.   

Abstract

Publicly available skin image datasets are increasingly used to develop machine learning algorithms for skin cancer diagnosis. However, the total number of datasets and their respective content is currently unclear. This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate all publicly available skin image datasets used for skin cancer diagnosis by exploring their characteristics, data access requirements, and associated image metadata. A combined MEDLINE, Google, and Google Dataset search identified 21 open access datasets containing 106 950 skin lesion images, 17 open access atlases, eight regulated access datasets, and three regulated access atlases. Images and accompanying data from open access datasets were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Among the 14 datasets that reported country of origin, most (11 [79%]) originated from Europe, North America, and Oceania exclusively. Most datasets (19 [91%]) contained dermoscopic images or macroscopic photographs only. Clinical information was available regarding age for 81 662 images (76·4%), sex for 82 848 (77·5%), and body site for 79 561 (74·4%). Subject ethnicity data were available for 1415 images (1·3%), and Fitzpatrick skin type data for 2236 (2·1%). There was limited and variable reporting of characteristics and metadata among datasets, with substantial under-representation of darker skin types. This is the first systematic review to characterise publicly available skin image datasets, highlighting limited applicability to real-life clinical settings and restricted population representation, precluding generalisability. Quality standards for characteristics and metadata reporting for skin image datasets are needed.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34772649     DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00252-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Digit Health        ISSN: 2589-7500


  4 in total

1.  A Secure Framework toward IoMT-Assisted Data Collection, Modeling, and Classification for Intelligent Dermatology Healthcare Services.

Authors:  Md Khairul Islam; Chetna Kaushal; Md Al Amin; Abeer D Algarni; Nazik Alturki; Naglaa F Soliman; Romany F Mansour
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.009

2.  Addressing fairness in artificial intelligence for medical imaging.

Authors:  Rodrigo Echeveste; Enzo Ferrante; María Agustina Ricci Lara
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 17.694

Review 3.  Artificial Intelligence in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Current Status and Future Perspectives: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Sara Momtazmanesh; Ali Nowroozi; Nima Rezaei
Journal:  Rheumatol Ther       Date:  2022-07-18

Review 4.  The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Early Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Benjamin Hunter; Sumeet Hindocha; Richard W Lee
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 6.639

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.