| Literature DB >> 34770966 |
Alice Nguvoko Kiyonga1, Gyu Hwan Park2, Hyun Su Kim1, Young-Ger Suh1, Tae Kon Kim3, Kiwon Jung1.
Abstract
Ionic liquids (ILs) have attracted significant interest because of their desirable properties. These characteristics have improved their application to overcome the shortcomings of conventional separation techniques for phytochemicals. In this study, several ILs were investigated for their capacity to extract isoimperatorin, a bioactive furanocoumarin, from the roots of Ostericum koreanum. Herein, 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([Bmim][BF4]) was selected as a promising IL for separating isoimperatorin. A central composite design was applied to optimize the extraction conditions. Under the optimal conditions, the yield of isoimperatorin reached 97.17 ± 1.84%. Additionally, the recovery of isoimperatorin from the [Bmim][BF4] solution was successfully achieved (87.73 ± 2.37%) by crystallization using water as an antisolvent. The purity of the isoimperatorin was greatly enhanced, from 0.26 ± 0.28% in the raw material to 26.94 ± 1.26% in the product, in a one-step crystallization process. Namely, an enhancement of approximately 103-folds was reached. The developed approach overcomes the shortcomings of conventional separation methods applied for gaining isoimperatorin by significantly reducing the laboriousness of the process and the consumption of volatile organic solvents. Moreover, the simplicity and effectiveness of the method are assumed to be valuable for producing isoimperatorin-enriched products and for promoting its purification. This work also confirms the efficiency of ILs as a promising material for the separation of phytochemicals.Entities:
Keywords: Ostericum koreanum; crystallization; enrichment; extraction; ionic liquids; isoimperatorin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34770966 PMCID: PMC8588393 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26216555
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structure of isoimperatorin.
Figure 2Effect of extraction media on the extraction yield of isoimperatorin.
Figure 3Effect of several variables on the extraction efficiency of isoimperatorin. (a) effect of sonication time, (b) effect of extraction time, (c) effect of solid to liquid ratio, (d) effect of solid to liquid ratio.
Experimental matrix according to the central composite design (CCD) and response for extraction of isoimperatorin.
| Run | X1 | X2 | Concentration (ug) | Concentration (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted | Experimental | Experimental | |||
| 1 | 30 | 1:5 | 1.35 | 1.29 | 48.88 |
| 2 | 30 | 1:20 | 2.52 | 2.45 | 93.02 |
| 3 | 120 | 1:5 | 1.45 | 1.38 | 52.31 |
| 4 | 120 | 1:20 | 2.65 | 2.57 | 97.62 |
| 5 | 75 | 1:2 | 0.95 | 1.02 | 38.86 |
| 6 | 75 | 1:23 | 2.61 | 2.68 | 102.05 |
| 7 | 11.5 | 1:12.5 | 2.12 | 2.19 | 83.31 |
| 8 | 140 | 1:12.5 | 2.29 | 2.37 | 90.09 |
| 9 | 75 | 1:12.5 | 2.45 | 2.39 | 90.97 |
| 10 | 75 | 1:12.5 | 2.45 | 2.40 | 91.24 |
| 11 | 75 | 1:12.5 | 2.45 | 2.42 | 92.12 |
| 12 | 75 | 1:12.5 | 2.45 | 2.55 | 96.95 |
| 13 | 75 | 1:12.5 | 1.35 | 2.47 | 93.99 |
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).
| Degrees of Freedom | Sum of Squares | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 5 | 5219.74 | 82.97 | 0.0001 |
| X1 | 1 | 38.75 | 3.08 | 0.123 |
| X2 | 1 | 3997.11 | 317.69 | 0.0001 |
| X12 | 1 | 146.14 | 11.62 | 0.011 |
| X22 | 1 | 1037.39 | 89.25 | 0.0001 |
| X1X2 | 1 | 0.34 | 0.03 | 0.873 |
| Residual | 7 | 88.07 | - | - |
| Lack of fit | 3 | 63.46 | 3.44 | 0.132 |
| Pure error | 4 | 24.61 | - | - |
| Total | 12 | 5307.81 | ||
| R2 | 98.34% | |||
| R2 -adj | 97.16% |
Figure 4Plots of the extraction yield of isoimperatorin versus variables. (a) Three-dimensional response surface plot, (b) Contour plot.
Recovery rates of isoimperatorin at different ratios of the [Bmim][BF4] IL extraction solution to DW.
| Ratios | Recovery Yield of Isoimperatorin (mg) | Recovery Yield of Isoimperatorin (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1:05 | 0.62 | 24.03 |
| 1:1 | 1.31 | 50.78 |
| 1:1.5 | 1.76 | 68.22 |
| 1:2 | 2.04 | 79.07 |
| 1:2.5 | 2.29 | 86.43 |
| 1:3 | 2.12 | 82.17 |
Verification recovery experiment and purity of isoimperatorin in the product.
| Run | Weight of the Product (mg) | Recovery Yield of Isoimperatorin (mg) | Recovery Yield of Isoimperatorin (%) | Purity of Isoimperatorin (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9.12 | 2.33 | 90.31 | 25.55 |
| 2 | 8.03 | 2.25 | 87.21 | 28.02 |
| 3 | 8.11 | 2.21 | 85.66 | 27.25 |
| Average | 8.42 | 2.26 | 87.73 | 26.94 |
| Standard deviation | 0.61 | 0.06 | 2.37 | 1.26 |
Figure 5HPLC chromatographic spectra of isoimperatorin standard, the [Bmim][BF4] extraction solution and the product at 254 nm.