| Literature DB >> 34770927 |
Juan Leopoldo Pech-Almeida1, Carmen Téllez-Pérez1,2, Maritza Alonzo-Macías1, Giselle Dení Teresa-Martínez1, Karim Allaf2, Tamara Allaf3, Anaberta Cardador-Martínez1.
Abstract
Food processing systematically aims at meeting the needs of consumers who are looking for total high quality and perfect food safety. As the various thermal and non-thermal food preservation technologies often affect the natural properties in terms of sensation, flavor, texture, etc., instant controlled pressure drop (DIC) has been conceived as a relevant, innovative process in this field. DIC uses high saturated steam pressure and short duration to provide a new way to expand biological matrices, improve drying, decontaminate, and extract biologically active compounds, among other attributes. Therefore, this review focuses on describing the applications of DIC technology on a wide range of products such as foods and by-products that have been processed both in the laboratory and on an industrial scale. The application of DIC has shown the possibility of a significant leap in quality improvement and cost reduction in the food industry. DIC reduces the drying time of fruits and vegetables, and improves the extraction of essential oils, vegetable oils, and antioxidant components. It also provides strong decontamination, eliminates vegetative microorganisms and spores, and reduces non-nutritional and allergenic components. Over the past 33 years, this technology has continued to expand its food applications and improve its characteristics on an industrial scale. But there are still many food unit operations that can be taken to the next level with DIC.Entities:
Keywords: decontamination; extraction; swell-drying
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34770927 PMCID: PMC8588140 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26216519
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Main applications of the instant controlled pressure-drop DIC technology in food processing.
Figure 2Typical pressure/temperature-time profile for a DIC processing cycle: (1) introduction of food material to the reactor; (2) establishment of an initial vacuum in the processing reactor; (3) injection of dry saturated steam until achieving and retaining a previous target pressure during a selected treatment time; (4) instant controlled pressure-drop towards a vacuum, and (5) releasing to atmospheric pressure.
Figure 3Left: Schematic diagram of DIC Equipment: (1) DIC reactor; (2) vacuum tank; (3) vacuum pump; (4) Trap, V1-V7-valves, S1, and S2 saturated steam injection, W1- cooling water. Right: Laboratory DIC equipment (ABCAR-DIC Process, Compiègne, France).
Figure 4Scheme of the main transfer phenomena during convective airflow drying. (1) Heat transfer by convection; (2) Heat transfer by conduction within the food matrix; (3) Water transfer by diffusion and (4) Mass transfer by evaporation. Modified from Allaf et al. [3].
Summary of the DIC conditions applied to treat fruits and some key findings.
| Matrix | Objective | Applied Treatment: Pressure; Time | Optimal: Pressure; Time | Key Findings | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apples ( | Improve drying kinetics of apple granule powder with DIC | 200–500 kPa, 1 cycle, for 5 to 55 s | 450 kPa, 1 cycle, 12 s | 55% reduction of drying time | [ |
| Coupling of Osmotic Pretreatment to DIC to inhibit apple cubes deformation | 95 °C; atmospheric pressure for 10 min, further decompression, and Vacuum of 4–6 kPa for 1 h | - | DIC helped with perceived hardness compared to HA drying, but the solutions improved the crispiness factor | [ | |
| Compare the effect of pectin modification with DIC for texture analysis | 95 °C atmospheric pressure for 10 min, further decompression and Vacuum of 4–6 kPa for 2 h | - | Pectin modification increased crispiness as comparable to MD and MCC Osmotic pre-treatment | [ | |
| Explain the effect of water equilibrium process on expansion behavior of apple | 95 °C atmospheric pressure for 10 min, further decompression, and vacuum of 4–6 kPa for 2 h | - | The water equilibrium process prevented the collapsing of the dried apple cube after DIC and provided for fully expanded pores | [ | |
| Effects of 4 different drying methods on the characteristics of cell wall polysaccharides and correlation with texture of apple chips. | 200–300 kPa, 10–15 min | - | The apple chips exhibited higher crispness and better microstructure | [ | |
| To evaluate partial air drying, DIC treatment, and/or freezing effects on apple textural characteristics | 100–300 kPa; 5–45 s | 200 kPa; 26 s | DIC treatment attenuates the negative impacts on textural quality of high-water content products such as apple | [ | |
| To characterize the browning ratio, color changes, and polyphenol oxidase behavior of dehydrated apple slices | The samples were treated at 95 °C for 15 min, then by 5 kPa vacuum in 0.2 s. | - | Remarkable increment in the browning ratio of Air Dried-DIC textured apple slices with reduced activity of polyphenol oxidase. | [ | |
| Apple ( | Freezing/thawing profiles of conventionally and DIC dehydrofrozen apples | 200 kPa; 25 s | - | The lower the water content, the higher the thawed apple firmness. No significant impact of freezing rate. DIC-dehydrofreezing exhibited significant reduction of thawing duration and enhanced frozen apple fruit texture. | [ |
| Banana ( | Obtain and characterize DIC Treated banana flour | 260–500 kPa; 12 to 48 s | 500 kPa, 11 s | There were a 23% increase in effective diffusivity, 290% increase in WHC *, and 15% OHC reduction | [ |
| Strawberry ( | To evaluate the effect of DIC on strawberry slices | 200–470 kPa; 2–18 s | 220–350 kPa | An increment in the expansion rate of 2.4 times was observed. | [ |
| To study the impact of DIC on antioxidant and crispiness of strawberry snacks | 170–600 kPa; 10–27 s | 600 kPa; 10 s | The highest crispiness: 600 kPa, 10 s | [ | |
| Berry cacti ( | To preserve the antioxidant capacity of berry cacti after DIC processing | 100–450 kPa; 5–45 s | 450 kPa; 25 s | DIC was an efficient method to dry berry cacti, comparable to freeze-drying. | [ |
| Date ( | Obtain Zaghloul Snacks and characterize them | 200–600 kPa, 9 s to 35 s | 600 kPa; 22 s | 146% expansion ratio achieved; 59% increase in color intensity | [ |
* WHC: water holding capacity; OHC: Oil holding capacity.
DIC conditions to treat food byproducts and some key findings.
| Matrix | Objective | DIC conditions: Pressure; Time | Optimal: Pressure; Time | Key Findings | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cactus Pear ( | Obtain Cactus pear Snacks and characterize them | 100–600 kPa; 5 s–25 s | 600 kPa; 15 s | 2122% expansion ratio and 83% shear force reduction. 52.1% Scavenging ability was reported, which is a 52% increase over untreated CPP | [ |
| Orange ( | Compare the effect of DIC against hydro distillation for orange peels | 600 kPa, 1 to 11 cycles and a total heating time of 30 s to 210 s | 600 kPa, 11 cycles with 152 s as a total heating time | 4.2% higher EO extraction yield from peels for 2.5-min treatment, instead of 4 h | [ |
| Orange ( | Valorize Orange Industry by-products with DIC | 330–600 kPa, 1–7 cycles with 20–220 s as a total heating time | 490 kPa, 5 cycles, and 186 s as a total heating time | An overall increase in the compound availability was observed. E.g., a 594% increase in water diffusivity | [ |
| Cranberry pomace and seeds | Improve the product′s multidimensional qualities of nutritional, hygienic, organoleptic, and convenience attributes. | 200–500 kPa; 5–15 s | - | A great increase in kinetics of drying and rehydration was observed. The natural taste was preserved | [ |
DIC conditions to treat vegetables and some key findings.
| Matrix | Objective | DIC Conditions: Pressure; Time | Optimal Conditions: Pressure; Time | Key Findings | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrots ( | Impact of DIC treatment on the expansion ratio, color, and degree of cooking of diced carrots | 200–600 kPa; 2–30 s | 450 kPa; 25 s | Airflow impingement just after DIC treatment as modification of DIC equipment leads to intensifying cooling of thermal sensitive foods such as carrots. | [ |
| Characteristics of DIC Swell-Dried, thin-layer drying of carrots compared to the traditional Hot Air Drying. | 100–500 kPa, 5–55 s | 440 kPa, 48 s | DIC-assisted Swell-drying can intensify the drying of carrots reducing the drying time and increasing the final quality. | [ | |
| Coupling freezing and osmotic dehydration to DIC. | 95 °C for 15 min, 100 kPa | - | Freezing at −18 or −40 °C modifies the carrot microstructure and thereby enhances the DIC expansion | [ | |
| Effect of several DIC-pretreatments on the carrots blanching | 250–550 kPa, 20 s | 500 kPa, 20 s | Long freezing/thawing induced more dilation and cellular breakdown, and thus, it facilitated the diffusion of water within the cells during dehydration. | [ | |
| Potatoes ( | Dehydration of potato slices. | 200–500 kPa, 1 cycle, for 5 to 55 s | 350–500 kPa, 1 cycle, 10 s | Reduction in drying time. Increase in expansion ratio. | [ |
| To confer a porous structure to potatoes by DIC texturing, thus facilitating the drying process at a lower water content | 300 to 600 kPa, 1 cycle, for 20 s | 600 kPa, 1 cycle, for 20 s | A lower value of water activity | [ | |
| Tomatoes ( | Effect of swell-drying of tomatoes slices on texture and rehydration | 100–700 kPa; 5–45 s | 400 kPa; 30 s | The firmest structure after rehydration was obtained for tomato slices and preservation of antioxidant capacity. | [ |
| Tomato paste | To decrease drying processing time of tomato paste; while preserving the quality. | 100–500 kPa; 10–50 s | 300 kPa; 30 s | DIC texturing reduced drying time from 7 to 1.5 h and improved the effective water diffusivity | [ |
| Onion ( | To improve the quality of processed onion in regards to color retention and maximum expansion | 200 kPa; 20–30 s; and subsequently 600 kPa; 0–10 s | - | Compared to CAD, DIC swell-dried onions were threefold more expanded, with a perfectly controlled color (white, yellowish, golden, brown, even caramelized). | [ |
| Improve drying kinetics of onion granule powder with DIC | 200–500 kPa, 1 cycle, for 5 to 55 s | 350 and 500 kPa, 1 cycle, 10 s | 55% reduction of drying time with 99 % reduction in microbial contamination | [ | |
| Improve drying kinetics of onion with DIC | 200–500 kPa, 1 cycle for 5 to 15 s | 460 kPa, 1 cycle for 14 s | 223% Improve in effective diffusivity and initial availability. The harsher the treatment, the more difference perceived to the original sensory profile. 3.9 log F reduction of UFC | [ | |
| Pepper ( | Determine the impact of DIC on dehydration and rehydration kinetics | 200–600 kPa, 1 Cycle, and 5 to 35 s | - | 246% Increase in dehydration effective diffusivity and 224% in starting accessibility | [ |
| Cassava roots ( | To study the effect of swell-drying on drying kinetics, physical product properties, and microbial decontamination of fresh cassava. | 300–540 kPa; 12–48 s | 400 kPa; 12 s | An increase of 6.6 and 5 times in water and oil holding capacity, respectively. An 85.7% reduction of the initial bacteria content was obtained. | [ |
| Okra Pods ( | To compare swell-drying against conventional shade drying and optimize DIC texturing of green okra pods. | 200–600 kPa; 40–60 s | 400 kPa; 50 s | An increase of 25% and 99% of the relative expansion ratio and flavonoid content, respectively in swell-dried okra pods compared with conventional shadow dried ones | [ |
| Beetroot ( | To evaluate the effect of DIC as blanching and texturing pre-treatment on the antioxidant content and antioxidant activity preservation of beetroots | 100–530 kPa; 5–31 s | 350 kPa; 20 s | The application of DIC as blanching and texturing pre-treatment maintained or enhanced the content of phenolic compounds and the antioxidant capacity. | [ |
Figure 5Examples of swell-dried fruit and vegetable products.
Summary of the DIC conditions observed in the treatment of cereals and some key findings.
| Matrix | Objective | DIC Conditions: Pressure; Time | Optimal: Pressure; Time | Key Findings | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maize ( | To compare the effects of pressure against processing time for native starch | 100–500 kPa for 120 s vs. 300 kPa for 30–900 s | It depends on the objective | Both factors, pressure and time, increased starch gelatinization | [ |
| Study the effects of DIC in physicochemical Properties of Starches | 100–300 kPa for 5–60 min | - | Potato starch was more prone to DIC treatment, and Rheological behavior for all the starches approximate Newtonian behavior, except waxy maize starch | [ | |
| Characterize Structural modifications and thermal transitions of maize starch after DIC | 100 kPa, 10–180 min. | - | Pressure influenced the viscosity positively, with time achieving a peak and then reducing viscosity | [ | |
| Study the effects of DIC in physicochemical properties of starches | 100–300 kPa, 600–5400 s | - | For treated starches, there was a positive correlation of pressure and time to the transition temperatures increase, gelatinization, and increased enzymatic hydrolysis sensibility | [ | |
| Develop a model for water distribution change of maize starch during DIC | 100 kPa; 0–60 min | - | As processing pressure increases, the water activity coefficient and mass transfer coefficient decreases | [ | |
| Study the effects of DIC in physicochemical properties of starches | 100 kPa; 90 min | - | Potato starch was more prone to DIC treatment, and rheological behavior for all the starches approximate Newtonian behavior, except waxy maize starch | [ | |
| Compare DIC to direct vapor and reduced pressure heat treatments | 100–300 kPa; 20–41 s | - | DIC created bigger granule sizes compared to the other treatments tested | [ | |
| Rice ( | Study the effects of DIC on paddy rice | 400–600 kPa; 15–40 s | 500 kPa for 16 to 30 s | 65%-time reduction in post-production cooking time | [ |
| Wheat ( | To evaluate DIC texturing on some physicochemical and nutritional properties of puffed wheat snacks products | 300–500 kPa; 3–11 s | 500 kPa for 7 min | A wheat grain expansion was obtained, as well as better sensorial properties | [ |
Summary of the DIC conditions and some key findings in animal food.
| Matrix | Objective | DIC Treatment: Pressure, Time | Optimal: Pressure, Time. | Key Findings | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skim milk Powder | To study the main effects of DIC operative conditions on structural, physical, and reconstitution characteristics of skim milk powder | 200–1000 kPa, 2–60 s | 570 kPa, 44 s | Higher powder quality with less fine powder | [ |
| Leerdammer cheese from | Characterize cheese snacks and powdered granules | 200–600 kPa, 10–30 s | 550 kPa, 30 s | Up to 36 times volume increase, leading to higher porosity and lower bulk density | [ |
| Ras Cheese | To study the direct expansion of cheese pieces to expand them and grinding lead to expanded granule powders. | 400–500 kPa, 10–50 s | 500 kPa and 10 s | DIC texturing acts on reorganizing cheese through the thermal-mechanical effects forming cavities and vacuoles and an expanded structure. | [ |
| Eggs from ( | Observe the changes in behavior of different physicochemical properties of egg products | 100–700 kPa, 10–60 s | 550 kPa, 33 s | The physicochemical properties are related to pressure for both egg white and yolk. | [ |
| Chicken breast ( | To develop a newly expanded texture on dried meat | 400–700 kPa; 82 to 130 s | 530 kPa; 110 s | An expansion ratio was obtained 15 times higher than untreated samples; the rehydration behavior was also improved. | [ |
| Atlantic salmon ( | To study the effect of several successive pressure-drops on fish cubes (multi-flash autovaporization) | 260–540 kPa; 4–46 s | A reduction in dehydration time was observed | [ | |
| Shrimp | To obtain shrimp snacks and characterize them | 400–700 kPa; 70–130 s | 500 kPa; 70 s | More expanded with higher porosity dried material thanks to the mechanical stress caused by vapor generated within the pores | [ |
Effect of DIC on the essential oil extraction, main conditions, and key findings.
| Matrix | Objective | DIC Conditions: Pressure, Time; Cycles | Optimal Condition; Pressure; time, Cycles | Key Findings | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyssop ( | Determine the optimum condition for the extraction of Hyssopus officinalis L. essential oil (EO) by instant controlled pressure-drop | 100–350 kPa, 20–100 s per cycle; 1 to 12 cycles | 100 kPa, 12 cycles of 100 s | DIC increases the yield and quality of essential oil, while reducing the extraction time. | [ |
| To obtain the maximum yield of essential oil | 100–350 kPa, 20–60 s | 350 kPa; 20 s; 9 cycles | DIC increased the yield and the quality of essential oil. | [ | |
| Myrtle leaves ( | Compare the effect of DIC against hydro distillation for myrtle leaves | 2 to 6 cycles of 100–600 kPa and total heating time of 19–221 s; | 600 kPa, total heating time of 120 s; 4 cycles | DIC essential oils had a strongly spiced aroma and a particular odoriferous fragrance while being more translucent. | [ |
| Lavender Grosso ( | To evaluate the effect of DIC on the extraction of essential oil. | 100–600 kPa, 5–60 s, 1–9 cycles | 600 kPa thermal treatment time of 60 s; 2 cycles | DIC is a quick and effective process of essential oil extraction compared to steam distillation. | [ |
| Rosemary leaves ( | Deodorize rosemary leaves before extracting their antioxidants. | 600 kPa, 6–40 s per cycle; 1 to 11 cycles | 600 kPa; 16 s per cycle; 11 cycles | 6.25% increase in EO extraction with improved quality through 8.44% more oxygenated compounds. The residual solid after EO extraction showed 65% improvement in antioxidant availability. | [ |
| Orange peels ( | To extract essential citrus oil through DIC by autovaporization | 600 kPa, Total time 30–210 s; 1–11 cycles | 600 kPa; 11 cycles, total time of 152 s; | DIC extraction time was less than 3 min against hours for hydrodistillation. | [ |
| Apply DIC (steam explosion) to favor essential oil extraction by Clevenger apparatus. | 300 to 1200 kPa, 15–480 s | 800 kPa, 240 s | The swelling of the cells enabled an improved kinetic extraction in conditions of diffusivity and starting accessibility, leading to a high essential oil yield | [ | |
| Thyme ( | To use swell-drying process in the case of two different proveniences of thyme to improve texture and essential oil yield | 600 kPa; 20–60 s; 1–7 cycles | 10 s; 4 cycles | Swell-drying increases up to 10 times the effective diffusivity and twice the starting accessibility better than CAD. A relative expansion ratio was almost two. | [ |
Antioxidant extraction as modified by DIC treatment.
| Matrix | Objective | DIC Conditions: Pressure; Time | Optimum Condition: Pressure; Time | Key Findings | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orange peels ( | Valorize orange peels through phenol extraction. | 300–600 kPa, total time of 20–220 s for 1–7 cycles | 490 kPa, for 186 s in 5 cycles | Increased effective diffusivity and starting accessibility, higher extraction yield in total phenol. | [ |
| Hibiscus Flower ( | Effect of DIC on anthocyanin extraction | 70–200 kPa, 5–30 s | 180 kPa, 18 s | 135% improvement in Total Monomeric Anthocyanin extraction and a 10–45% improvement in effective diffusivity. | [ |
| Pomegranate peel ( | Effect of DIC texturing on total phenolic compounds extraction | 100–300 kPa, 10–60 s for 1–5 cycles. | 300 kPa, 60 s in 1 cycle. | Expanded material has lower mass transfer resistance and consequently enhances the extraction efficiency. | [ |
| Olive leaves ( | Obtain solvent extraction kinetics of total phenolic content in olive leaves | 100–700 kPa; 10–30 s; 1–3 cycles | 100 kPa, 11 s; 1 cycle | 176%, 103%, and 62% improvement in yields, starting accessibility, and overall diffusivity of total phenol extraction | [ |
| Chokecherry ( | Effect of drying methods on the antioxidant content and activity of chokecherry fruit | 240–460 kPa, 10–22 s | 270 kPa, 20 s | DIC treatment leads to better preservation of antioxidant compounds at room temperature. | [ |
| Stalk grape ( | Impact of DIC texturing on the extraction of phenolic compounds from stalk powder | 300 kPa, 50 s | - | DIC treatment increased the availability of gallic acid, quercetin, ellagic acid, and resveratrol | [ |
| Tea ( | To induce textural changes by DIC | 400 kPa, 0.1 s | - | The brewing of DIC processed tea can be performed in ambient temperature water. | [ |
Extraction of vegetable oil from raw materials treated by DIC.
| Matrix | Objective | DIC Conditions: Pressure; Time | Optimum Condition: Pressure; Time | Key Findings | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rapeseed seeds ( | Modeling of solvent extraction kinetics to identify the fundamental impact of DIC treatment and grinding of rapeseed seeds | 200–700 kPa; 20–120 s | 510 kPa, 50 s | All DIC tested conditions improve oil extraction compared to untreated seeds. | [ |
| Enhancing oil extraction yield from raw material either by pressure or solvent extraction | 100–700 kPa; 20 to 120 s | 580 kPa; 86 s | DIC-texturing technology intensified both rapeseed solvent (hexane) and pressing oil extractions | [ | |
| Soybean ( | Impact of the different mechanical pre-treatments and thermal/mechanical texturing ways on solvent extraction of soybeans. | 200–700 kPa; 20 to 120 s | 490 Pa; 96 s, | DIC pre-treatment increases oil yield while decreasing the extraction time without affecting the oil quality | [ |
| Safflower r ( | DIC texturing affects the mass transfer and increases oil extraction from safflower seeds | 100–350 kPa; 20–120 s; 1–5 cycles | 240 kPa, 20 s, 5 cycles | DIC-treated samples had improved mass transfer and oil yield. | [ |
| Sunflower seeds ( | DIC treatment to enhance cold-press oil extraction | 200–700 kPa; 15–75 s: | 500 kPa; 50 s | There was higher oil availability, increasing yields of the cold-press oil extraction. | [ |
| Date palm ( | To use DIC as a pretreatment to extract oil by supercritical fluids. | 100/700 kPa; 20–60 s | 619 kPa; 54 s | The higher the DIC pressure and treatment time, the higher the seed porosity. By coupling DIC to supercritical carbon dioxide extraction, the oil extraction from date seeds was intensified. | [ |
DIC treatment of legumes to reduce allergenicity.
| Matrix | Objective | DIC Conditions: Pressure; Time | Optimum Condition | Key Findings | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peanut ( | Impact of DIC treatment on peanut, lentil, chickpea, and soybean IgE antibody reactivity | 300–800 kPa, 33–180 s | 600 kPa for 180 s | DIC treatment produces a reduction in the overall in-vitro IgE binding of peanut, lentil, and chickpea and a drastic reduction in soybean immunoreactivity | [ |
| Lupins | Effect of DIC on in vitro lupin allergenicity | 300, 450, and 800 kPa for 60, 120 and 180 s | 600 kPa, 180 s | The combination of heat and steam provided by DIC eliminated the allergenicity of lupin | [ |
| Pistachios ( | Effect of DIC on the allergenicity of pistachios and cashew nut proteins | 300–700 kPa, 43–120 s | 700 kPa, 120 s | Although DIC treatments reduced the allergenicity of pistachios and cashew nuts, it was less effective than autoclave treatments | [ |
| Wheat gluten ( | Effect of DIC on chemical, functional, and immunological properties of wheat gluten powder | 100–165 °C; 20–60 s | 165 °C, 60 s | DIC treatment-induced formation of β-sheet, making gluten structure more rigid and modifying its functional properties. | [ |
Evaluation of DIC treatment on the content of non-nutritional factors in legumes.
| Matrix | Objective | DIC Conditions: Pressure; Time | Optimal Condition: Pressure; Time | Key Findings | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soybean ( | To study the effect of different conditions of pressure and time applied during DIC treatment to legumes, to reduce antinutritional factors. | 300–600 kPa; 60 s and 180 s | 600 kPa; 60 s | The DIC treatment increases the availability of soluble sugars but decreases phytates, lectin content, and trypsin inhibitors. | [ |
| Sarphonka | Compare the effect of DIC on oligosaccharides extractability on | 200–600 kPa, 30–240 s | 520 kPa; 197 s | Improvement in the extraction of ciceritol in 150% and 173% for stachyose, in 1 h instead of four hours. | [ |
| Rapeseed ( | To detoxify rapeseed flour by reducing glucosinolate content | 160–700 kPa; 6–74 s | 700 kPa; 74 s | A reduction of 40% in glucosinolate content is obtained in 60 s. The lowest level of glucosinolate corresponds to the highest pressure and time treatment. | [ |
| Black bean ( | Reduce Anti-nutritional factors in seeds and sprouts | 100–300 kPa; 10–80 s | It depends on the factor to optimize | DIC reduced the availability of Trypsin inhibitors, Saponins and Tannins | [ |