Literature DB >> 3477087

Craniofacial characteristics of subjects with normal and postnormal occlusions--a longitudinal study.

W J Kerr, D Hirst.   

Abstract

Lateral skull radiographs of 85 growth study children taken at 5, 10, and 15 years of age, with normal/Class I occlusion (normal) and Class II, Division 1/Division 2 occlusion (postnormal) were digitized and analyzed by means of stepwise discriminant analysis. The cranial base angle proved to be the best discriminator between the two groups, the value at age 5 years being an accurate predictor of the occlusal type at 15 years in 73% of subjects. Although the majority of subjects grew predictably, their craniofacial characteristics being compatible with their ultimate occlusal type, 17% showed a growth trend from postnormal to normal and 9% a trend from normal to postnormal. By 15 years of age, only 8% of subjects possessed an occlusion at variance with their facial type. The cranial base angle is suggested as the fundamental determinant of jaw relation, but in some subjects this may be compensated by differential jaw growth manifested by a change in angle ANB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3477087     DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(87)90413-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  12 in total

1.  Sagittal craniofacial growth evaluated on children dry skulls using V2 and V3 canal openings as references.

Authors:  J-Cl Harnet; T Lombardi; J-Ch Lutz; P Meyer; J-L Kahn
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2007-07-25       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Changes in Cranial Base Morphology in Class I and Class II Division 1 Malocclusions.

Authors:  Anirudh Agarwal; Harsh Pandey; Kamal Bajaj; Lavesh Pandey
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2013-02-26

3.  Phenotypic diversity in white adults with moderate to severe Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Lina M Moreno Uribe; Sara C Howe; Colleen Kummet; Kaci C Vela; Deborah V Dawson; Thomas E Southard
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  An anthropometric study of relationships between the clival angle and craniofacial measurements in adult human skulls.

Authors:  L Guyot; O Richard; P Adalian; C Bartoli; O Dutour; G Leonetti
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Dimensions of the craniocervical junction in longitudinal analysis of normal growth.

Authors:  Heidi Arponen; Marjut Evälahti; Janna Waltimo-Sirén
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 1.475

6.  Mandibular growth, remodeling, and maturation during infancy and early childhood.

Authors:  Yi-Ping Liu; Rolf G Behrents; Peter H Buschang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  The relationship between the cranial base and jaw base in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Alice Chin; Suzanne Perry; Chongshan Liao; Yanqi Yang
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 2.151

8.  Evaluation of relationship between cranial base angle and maxillofacial morphology in Indian population: A cephalometric study.

Authors:  Amit Bhattacharya; Amarjitsingh Bhatia; Dolly Patel; Nishit Mehta; Harshik Parekh; Rahul Trivedi
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2014-07

9.  Björk-Jarabak cephalometric analysis on CBCT synthesized cephalograms with different dentofacial sagittal skeletal patterns.

Authors:  Yalil Augusto Rodriguez-Cardenas; Luis Ernesto Arriola-Guillen; Carlos Flores-Mir
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

10.  Subjective facial analysis and its correlation with dental relationships.

Authors:  Gustavo Silva Siécola; Leopoldino Capelozza; Diego Coelho Lorenzoni; Guilherme Janson; José Fernando Castanha Henriques
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.