| Literature DB >> 34769369 |
Karolina A P Wijnands1, Dennis M Meesters1,2, Benjamin Vandendriessche3,4,5,6, Jacob J Briedé7, Hans M H van Eijk1, Peter Brouckaert3,4, Anje Cauwels3,4,8, Wouter H Lamers9, Martijn Poeze1.
Abstract
Competition for the amino acid arginine by endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (NOS3) and (pro-)inflammatory NO-synthase (NOS2) during endotoxemia appears essential in the derangement of the microcirculatory flow. This study investigated the role of NOS2 and NOS3 combined with/without citrulline supplementation on the NO-production and microcirculation during endotoxemia. Wildtype (C57BL6/N background; control; n = 36), Nos2-deficient, (n = 40), Nos3-deficient (n = 39) and Nos2/Nos3-deficient mice (n = 42) received a continuous intravenous LPS infusion alone (200 μg total, 18 h) or combined with L-citrulline (37.5 mg, last 6 h). The intestinal microcirculatory flow was measured by side-stream dark field (SDF)-imaging. The jejunal intracellular NO production was quantified by in vivo NO-spin trapping combined with electron spin-resonance (ESR) spectrometry. Amino-acid concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). LPS infusion decreased plasma arginine concentration in control and Nos3-/- compared to Nos2-/- mice. Jejunal NO production and the microcirculation were significantly decreased in control and Nos2-/- mice after LPS infusion. No beneficial effects of L-citrulline supplementation on microcirculatory flow were found in Nos3-/- or Nos2-/-/Nos3-/- mice. This study confirms that L-citrulline supplementation enhances de novo arginine synthesis and NO production in mice during endotoxemia with a functional NOS3-enzyme (control and Nos2-/- mice), as this beneficial effect was absent in Nos3-/- or Nos2-/-/Nos3-/- mice.Entities:
Keywords: NOS2; NOS3; arginine; citrulline; endotoxemia; microcirculation; nitric oxide synthase
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34769369 PMCID: PMC8584871 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222111940
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Plasma arginine, citrulline and ornithine concentrations in control and Nos-deficient mice under basal and endotoxemic conditions with or without L-citrulline supplementation. (A) Plasma arginine concentrations in control and Nos-deficient mice under basal and endotoxemic conditions with or without L-citrulline supplementation. (B) Plasma citrulline concentrations in control and Nos-deficient mice under basal and endotoxemic conditions with or without L-citrulline supplementation. (C) Plasma ornithine concentrations in control and Nos-deficient mice under basal and endotoxemic conditions with or without L-citrulline supplementation. * p-value < 0.05; $ p-value < 0.001; a p-value < 0.05 vs. control mice under basal conditions; b p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos2 mice under basal conditions; c p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos3 mice under basal conditions; d p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos2 mice under basal conditions; e p-value < 0.05 vs. control + LPS; f p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos2 mice + LPS; g p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos3 mice + LPS; h p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos2 mice + LPS. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined with one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Bonferroni correction between groups.
Figure 2Jejunal arginine, citrulline and ornithine concentrations in control and Nos-deficient mice under basal and endotoxemic conditions with or without L-citrulline supplementation. (A) Jejunal arginine concentrations in control and Nos-deficient mice under basal and endotoxemic conditions with or without L-citrulline supplementation. (B) Jejunal citrulline concentrations in control and Nos-deficient mice under basal and endotoxemic conditions with or without L-citrulline supplementation. (C) Jejunal ornithine concentrations in control and Nos-deficient mice under basal and endotoxemic conditions with or without L-citrulline supplementation.* p-value < 0.05; # p-value < 0.01; a p-value < 0.05 vs. control mice under basal conditions; b p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos2 mice under basal conditions; c p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos3 mice under basal conditions; d p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos2 mice under basal conditions; e p-value < 0.05 vs. control + LPS; f p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos2 mice + LPS; g p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos3 mice + LPS; h p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos2 mice + LPS. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined with one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Bonferroni correction between groups.
Figure 3NO production in jejunal tissue of control and Nos-deficient mice during basal and endotoxemic conditions, and after L-citrulline supplementation during endotoxemia. Basal jejunal NO production (in pmol MNIC/mg wet jejunal tissue) in control and Nos-deficient mice under basal and endotoxemic conditions with or without L-citrulline supplementation. * p-value < 0.05; a p-value < 0.05 vs. control mice under basal conditions; b p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos2 mice under basal conditions; c p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos3 mice under basal conditions; e p-value < 0.05 vs. control + LPS; f p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos2 mice + LPS. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined with one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Bonferroni correction between groups.
Figure 4Microcirculatory flow measurements with SDF-imaging in the jejunal villi. (A) The total number of perfused vessels in control and Nos-deficient mice under basal and endotoxemic conditions with or without L-citrulline supplementation. (B) The number of perfused vessels per villus in control and Nos-deficient mice under basal and endotoxemic conditions with or without L-citrulline supplementation.* p-value < 0.05; a p-value < 0.05 vs. control mice during basal conditions; b p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos2 mice during basal conditions; e p-value < 0.05 vs. control + LPS; f p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos2 mice + LPS; h p-value < 0.05 vs. Nos2 mice + LPS. Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined with one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Bonferroni correction between groups.