Literature DB >> 34767986

Magnetic field-induced interactions between phones containing magnets and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: Flip it to be safe?

Philipp Lacour1, Phi Long Dang2, Frank R Heinzel1, Abdul Shokor Parwani1, Felix Bähr1, Andreas Kucher3, Felix Hohendanner1, Thoralf Niendorf4, Faezeh Rahimi4, Nandita Saha4, Haopeng Han4, Kerstin Rubarth5, Mohammad Sherif1, Leif-Hendrik Boldt1, Burkert Pieske6, Florian Blaschke7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent case reports and small studies have reported activation of the magnet-sensitive switches in cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) by the new iPhone 12 series, initiating asynchronous pacing in pacemakers and suspension of antitachycardia therapies in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs).
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this prospective single-center observational study was to quantify the risk of magnetic field interactions of the iPhone 12 with CIEDs.
METHODS: A representative model of each CIED series from all manufacturers was tested ex vivo. Incidence and minimum distance necessary for magnet mode triggering were analyzed in 164 CIED patients with either the front or the back of the phone facing the device. The magnetic field of the iPhone 12 was analyzed using a 3-axis Hall probe.
RESULTS: Ex vivo, magnetic interference occurred in 84.6% with the back compared to 46.2% with the front of the iPhone 12 facing the CIED. In vivo, activation of the magnet-sensitive switch occurred in 30 CIED patients (18.3%; 21 pacemaker, 9 ICD) when the iPhone 12 was placed in close proximity over the CIED pocket and the back of the phone was facing the skin. Multiple binary logistic regression analysis identified implantation depth (95% confidence interval 0.02-0.24) as an independent predictor of magnet-sensitive switch activation.
CONCLUSION: Magnetic field interactions occur only in close proximity and with precise alignment of the iPhone 12 and CIEDs. It is important to advise CIED patients to not put the iPhone 12 directly on the skin above the CIED. Further recommendations are not necessary.
Copyright © 2021 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular implantable electronic device; Magnet-sensitive switch; Magnetic field interactions; Magnetic stray field; iPhone 12

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34767986     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.11.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  5 in total

1.  Magnetic interactions between CIEDs and consumer devices: a little distance goes a long way.

Authors:  Rand Ibrahim; Faisal M Merchant
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 1.759

Review 2.  Interference by Modern Smartphones and Accessories with Cardiac Pacemakers and Defibrillators.

Authors:  Fahd Nadeem; Cao Thach Tran; Estelle Torbey; Daniel Philbin; Carlos Morales; Michael Wu
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and Consumer Electronic Devices: The Proof Is in the Front Pocket.

Authors:  Christopher R Ellis; Nicholas E King
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2022-07-15

4.  Inappropriate shock delivery as a result of electromagnetic interference originating from the faulty electrical installation.

Authors:  Milos D Babic; Milosav Tomovic; Maja Milosevic; Branko Djurdjevic; Vasko Zugic; Aleksandra Nikolic
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 1.485

5.  Magnetic field interactions of smartwatches and portable electronic devices with CIEDs - Did we open a Pandora's box?

Authors:  Patrick Badertscher; Céline Vergne; Corentin Féry; Diego Mannhart; Thomas Quirin; Stefan Osswald; Michael Kühne; Christian Sticherling; Sven Knecht; Joris Pascal
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2022-09-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.