| Literature DB >> 34766658 |
Emma L Lane1, David J Harrison2, Elena Ramos-Varas2, Rachel Hills2, Sophie Turner2, Mariah J Lelos1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The risk of graft-induced dyskinesias (GIDs) presents a major challenge in progressing cell transplantation as a therapy for Parkinson's disease. Current theories implicate the presence of grafted serotonin neurons, hotspots of dopamine release, neuroinflammation and established levodopa-induced dyskinesia.Entities:
Keywords: 5-HTl-dopa; Parkinson's disease; cell therapy; dopamine; graft-induced dyskinesias; microglia; neuroinflammation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34766658 PMCID: PMC9208367 DOI: 10.1002/mds.28856
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mov Disord ISSN: 0885-3185 Impact factor: 9.698
FIG. 1(A) Schematic representation of the timeline of experimental events. (B) Table of pharmacological agents used during abnormal involuntary movement (AIMs) analysis in rats. (C) Mean and individual AIMs score for vmDA graft‐induced dyskinesias (GID) rats (n = 2). Mean AIMs score for non‐GID rats includes small vmDA grafts and vFB grafts, combined into “non‐GID” dataset (n = 6), in response to saline or drug challenges. AIMs were stable between 30 and 52 weeks post‐graft (both saline datasets, P < 0.05 for non‐GID vs. GID rats). Non‐GID rats demonstrate AIMs in response to l‐dopa, but no change in AIMs is evident in GID rats. For GID rats, 0.3 mg/kg buspirone (5‐HT1A agonist/D2‐like antagonist), fenfluramine (5‐HT reuptake inhibitor), 8‐OH‐DPAT+CP94253 (5‐HT1A/1B agonists), and SB399885 (5‐HT6 antagonist) did not alter expression of the AIMs behaviors (all ps < 0.05 for non‐GID vs. GID). High dose buspirone and eticlopride both abolish AIMs (ps = n.s. for non‐GID vs. GID), without affecting normal locomotion. (D) Mean net rotations to the ipsilateral (positive scale) and contralateral (negative scale) sides for non‐GID and GID rats in response to saline (P < 0.05 for non‐GID vs. GID rats), l‐dopa (P = 0.096) or amphetamine (P < 0.05). In contrast to non‐GID rats, GID rats did not rotate in response to amphetamine, but did rotate spontaneously and in response to l‐dopa. Note: All rats had complete unilateral lesions, as evidenced by their pre‐graft rotational response to amphetamine (non‐GID rats: mean = 12.3 net turns/minute, SEM = 0.95; GID rats: mean = 14.5 net turns/minute, SEM = 1.27) and the loss of nigral TH
FIG. 2(A) Immunohistochemical analysis of hESC‐derived vmDA and vFB grafts. Dopamine neurons (tyrosine hydroxylase [TH], Millipore, MAB318, 1:2000; brown DAB) and human nuclei (HuNu, Millipore, MAB1281, 1:1000; blue VectorSG) at 5× and 20× magnification in vFB grafts, small vmDA grafts from non‐GID rats and large vmDA grafts from GID rats. The HuNu+ graft core of the vFB graft is delineated with a black dashed line. Activated microglia within the graft core and border (Ox42 [CD11b], Serotec, MCA275G, 1:1000) at 5× and 20× magnification in each graft group. Immunolabeling of reactive astrocytes (GFAP, DAKO, Z0334, 1:1000), CD4+ t‐lymphocytes (Abcam, Ab33775, 1:100), CD8+ t‐lymphocytes (Serotec, MC4A48G, 1:500) and 5‐HT+ neuron staining (Immunostar, 20,080, 1:10000). 5‐HT+ “control” staining in the raphe nucleus is shown in the left panel, whereas the center and right panels demonstrate no positive staining in the small or large vmDA grafts. (B) Quantification of cells in hESC‐derived vmDA and vFB grafts. Graft volume, total HuNu+ cells, TH+ cells within the graft, GFAP+ cells within the striatum, Ox42/CD11b optical density within the graft core/border, Ox42 cells/mm3 within the graft core/border, CD4+ cells around the perimeter of the graft and CD8+ cells around the perimeter of the graft were quantified for vFB grafts, small vmDA grafts (non‐GID rats) and large vmDA grafts (GID rats). GID rats had grafts with more TH+ cells than vFB or small vmDA grafts [F2,5 = 10.45, P < 0.05; GID vs. non‐GID and vFB, ps = 0.01] and more GFAP+ cells than grafts in non‐GID rats [F2,5 = 4.20, P < 0.05; GID vs. non‐GID, P < 0.05]. More activated microglia (Ox42+/CD11b+) cells were evident in GID rats than in non‐GID or vFB grafted rats [F2,5 = 21.50, P < 0.05; GID vs. non‐GID and vFB, ps < 0.05]. No other group effects were significant. (C) Correlations between grafted cells and GID behaviors. Significant correlations were revealed between GID and TH+ and Ox42+ cells. No correlations were revealed between GID the total HuNu cell count, GFAP, CD4+ or CD8+ cells. For 5× magnification images, all scale bars = 100 μm; For 20× magnification images, all scale bars = 1000 μm. vFB = ventral forebrain control grafts; vmDA = ventral midbrain ventral mesencephalic grafts. Error bars = standard errors of the mean. *P ≤ 0.05, **P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001.