| Literature DB >> 34766072 |
Takashi Higuchi1, Yuichi Nakao2, Yasuaki Tanaka3, Masashi Sadakiyo4, Koki Hamada4, Shigeki Yokoyama5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pectoralis minor tightness has been thought to affect the scapular position. Despite the wide implementation of doorway stretch in clinical practice owing to its apparent effectiveness in stretching the pectoralis minor, limited studies have investigated its influence on the glenohumeral rotational range of motion (ROM). This study aimed to examine the acute effects of doorway stretch on the glenohumeral rotational ROM and the correlation between the scapular position and ROM.Entities:
Keywords: Baseball; Doorway stretch; GIRD; Glenohumeral internal rotation; Pectoralis minor; Scapular position
Year: 2021 PMID: 34766072 PMCID: PMC8568813 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.07.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JSES Int ISSN: 2666-6383
Figure 1Doorway stretch. The participant’s forearm is stabilized by an investigator.
Participant demographics.
| Variables | n = 34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Range | |
| Age (yr) | 16.4 ± 0.6 | 16-17 |
| Height (cm) | 171.2 ± 6 | 160-184 |
| Weight (kg) | 67.9 ± 8.3 | 53-85 |
| Exposure (yr) | 8.4 ± 2.3 | 4-11 |
SD, standard deviation.
Participant self-report.
Comparison between each variable before and after stretching.
| Variables | Pre | Post | Cohen's d | 95% CI for Cohen's d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||
| Pectoralis minor length (cm) | ||||||
| Dominant Rib4–CP | 16.1 ± 1.2 | 16.7 ± 1.1 | −0.32 | −0.8 | −0.2 | |
| Nondominant Rib4–CP | 16.7 ± 1.0 | 16.8 ± 1.0 | −0.09 | −0.2 | −0.05 | |
| GH ROM (°) | ||||||
| Dominant ABIR | 42.9 ± 10.9 | 48.7 ± 12.0 | −0.54 | −8.8 | −2.4 | |
| Nondominant ABIR | 57.4 ± 10.6 | 59.6 ± 9.5 | .41 | −0.23 | −3.9 | 1.7 |
| Dominant ABER | 103.0 ± 7.7 | 102.0 ± 8.8 | .6 | 0.03 | −2.4 | 2 |
| Nondominant ABER | 95.2 ± 9.3 | 93.7 ± 6.2 | .26 | 0.16 | −1.2 | 4.4 |
| Dominant TMA | 145.9 ± 13.3 | 150.9 ± 15.7 | −0.37 | −9.1 | −1.1 | |
| Nondominant TMA | 153.3 ± 15.1 | 153.9 ± 10.6 | .82 | −0.1 | −5.1 | 4 |
| GIRD | 14.7 ± 13.7 | 11.0 ± 13.1 | .11 | 0.41 | 0.6 | 9.9 |
| Scapular position | ||||||
| Dominant AD-S (mm) | 70.3 ± 19.9 | 62.3 ± 14.0 | 0.29 | 3.4 | 13.8 | |
| Nondominant AD-S (mm) | 64.8 ± 15.7 | 65.0 ± 15.7 | .94 | −0.02 | 2.1 | 11.6 |
| Dominant AD-R (mm) | 46.2 ± 16.0 | 37.7 ± 11.3 | 0.13 | 4.7 | 10.7 | |
| Nondominant AD-R (mm) | 37.8 ± 10.7 | 39.5 ± 11.7 | .54 | −0.15 | 1.1 | 7.6 |
| Dominant scapular index | 64.7 ± 4.2 | 67.4 ± 5.3 | −0.72 | −4.4 | −1.6 | |
| Nondominant scapular index | 69.3 ± 4.2 | 70.2 ± 4.3 | −0.32 | −1.7 | −0.1 | |
Pre, before stretching; Post, after stretching; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; Rib 4–CP, distance from the sternocostal joint of rib 4 to the coracoid process; GH ROM, glenohumeral range of motion; ABIR, glenohumeral internal rotation angle with the shoulder abducted at 90°; ABER, glenohumeral external rotation angle with the shoulder abducted at 90°; TMA, total motion arc; GIRD, glenohumeral internal rotation deficit; AD-S, acromial distance in the static position; AD-R, acromial distance with the scapula retracted; SD, standard deviation.
Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
Bold font indicates statistical significance.
Spearman correlation matrix between each degree of change in variables.
| Variables | Degree | Degree | Degree | Degree | Degree | Degree | Degree |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rib4–CP | ABIR | ABER | TMA | GIRD | AD-S | AD-R | |
| Degree. ABIR | −0.07 | ||||||
| Degree. ABER | −0.04 | −0.05 | |||||
| Degree. TMA | −0.08 | ||||||
| Degree. GIRD | 0.01 | −0.22 | |||||
| Degree. AD-S | −0.15 | −0.18 | 0.17 | ||||
| Degree. AD-R | −0.06 | 0.31 | −0.39 | 0.19 | |||
| Degree. Scapular index | −0.04 | −0.23 | −0.21 | 0.01 | −0.08 | 0.08 |
Degree, degree of change; Rib 4–CP, distance from the sternocostal joint of rib 4 to the coracoid process; ABIR, glenohumeral internal rotation angle with the shoulder abducted at 90°; ABER, glenohumeral external rotation angle with the shoulder abducted at 90°; TMA, total motion arc; GIRD, glenohumeral internal rotation deficit; AD-S, acromial distance in the static position; AD-R, acromial distance with the scapula retracted.
Bold font indicates statistical significance.
P < .01.
P < .05.
Figure 2Significant correlation between the degree of change in internal rotation range of motion and that in acromial distance in the static position (r = 0.44; P < .01). ABIR, glenohumeral internal rotation angle with the shoulder abducted at 90°; AD-S, acromial distance in the static position.