| Literature DB >> 34766053 |
Ayokunle Akinola1, Ghanshyam Singh1, Alain Ndjiongue2.
Abstract
The COVID -19 outbreak since inception has put the whole world in an unprecedented difficult situation by bringing life around the world to a frightening halt and claiming thousands of lives. Due to COVID-19's spreading across 212 countries globally, an increasing number of infected cases and death tolls rose to 146,841,882, and 3,104,743 (as of April 26, 2021), this remains a real threat to the public health system. This paper presents a novel design for the frequency-domain reconfigurable antenna at Ku and K-bands for satellite-internet of thing (IoT) tracking applications. Four reconfigurable antenna is proposed with the use of four different switch mechanisms. Furthermore, switches are used to change resonance frequency to Ku- and K-bands on the antenna surface with four stages. With the help of the 3D electromagnetic computer simulation technology (CST) studio suite, we model the proposed antenna, perform the simulation with a frequency-domain solver, and validate the results with a time-domain solver with both results obtained in agreement as the proposed reconfigurable antenna operates over a wide frequency range for the satellite-IoT network to track COVID-19 pandemic.Entities:
Keywords: Antenna; COVID-19; Coronavirus; IoT; Sensor
Year: 2021 PMID: 34766053 PMCID: PMC8054548 DOI: 10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100094
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sens Int ISSN: 2666-3511
Fig. 1Frame work IoT health care system [26].
Fig. 2Patient monitor system and device architecture.
Fig. 3COVID-19 monitoring in hospital architecture [45].
Fig. 4Remote system tracking architecture [51].
Fig. 5System infrastructure.
Fig. 6Reconfiguration techniques.
Fig. 7States of the CST 3D antenna's unit cells.
Value of parameters.
| Parameters | Values | Parameters | Values |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wsub | 23.4 | H | 0.508 |
| Lusb | 23 | F | 1 |
| Lg | 14.642 | G | 0.358 |
| t | 0.035 | Wg | 13.45 |
| Wp | 16.2 | Lp | 5.65 |
| d | 1 | R1 | 1.5 |
Model switching stages.
| state | S1 | S2 | Frequency (GHz) | Bandwidth (MHz) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | on | on | 21.9 | 824 |
| 2 | on | off | 16.5 | 429 |
| 3 | off | on | 21.7 | 655 |
| 4 | off | off | 16 | 428 |
Fig. 8Radiation pattern at states.
Fig. 9The return loss of stages merged.
Fig. 10Fairfield gains at stages.
Fig. 11Current distribution.
Performance presentation table.
| Frequency (GHz) | 16.5 | 21.7 | 21.9 | 16 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gain (dB) | 4.34 | 4.70 | 5.11 | 5.42 |
| Directivity (dB) | 5.26 | 5.60 | 5.71 | 5.81 |
State of the art comparison.
| S/N | No of switches | Substrate | Thickness (mm2) | Area (mm2) | No of resonances | Bandwidth at difference resonance (MHz) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | FR 4 | 1.56 | 8580 | 4 | 245, 173, 228, 60 | [ |
| 2 | 3 | R04003 | 1.2 | 645 | 4 | 120, 160, 200, 400 | [ |
| 3 | 3 | FR4 | 0.8 | 400 | 3 | 210, 400, 580 | [ |
| 4 | 3 | RO4360B | 0.8 | 675 | 6 | 100, 120, 280, 220, 100, 320 | [ |
| 5 | 2 | RT5880 | 0.254 | 2000 | 2 | 192, 168 | [ |
| 6 | 2 | RT5880 (lossy) | 0.508 | 538.2 | 4 | 824, 655, 429, 428 | This work |