| Literature DB >> 34765582 |
Wen-Yi Liu1,2,3, Jing-Ping Yi4, Tao-Hsin Tung5, Jian-Bo Yan4.
Abstract
Background: There has been a recent worsening of air pollution in China, which poses a huge threat to public health by inducing and promoting circulatory and respiratory diseases. This study aimed to explore the association between the concentration of air pollution and daily internal medicine outpatient visits registered for the treatment of circulatory and respiratory symptoms in Zhoushan, China using a time-series method.Entities:
Keywords: China; PM2.5; SO2; Zhoushan; air pollution; outpatient visit; time-series study
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34765582 PMCID: PMC8575696 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.749191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Descriptive statistics for the daily outpatient clinics, concentrations of air pollutants, and weather conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| |||||||
| Temperature (°C) | 17.0 (7.6) | 17.2 (7.4) | 17.9 (8.1) | 17.8 (8.1) | 17.7 (8.1) | 17.5 (7.4) | 0.616 |
| Humidity (%) | 80.1(11.7) | 80.8 (11.4) | 82.3 (11.6) | 79.0 (12.0) | 81.9 (11.8) | 81.3 (11.6) | 0.002 |
|
| |||||||
| SO2 (μg/m3) | 5.8 (4.6) | 6.4 (3.7) | 9.0 (2.9) | 10.2 (2.9) | 6.73 (3.3) | 4.65 (1.5) | <0.001 |
| NO2 (μg/m3) | 22.2 (12.8) | 23.4 (13.6) | 19.9 (10.9) | 18.0 (10.5) | 17.55 (10.8) | 18.3 (9.6) | <0.001 |
| CO (mg/m3) | 0.7 (0.2) | 0.6 (0.3) | 0.7 (0.2) | 0.7 (0.2) | 0.7 (0.2) | 0.6 (0.2) | <0.001 |
| O3 (μg/m3) | 89.9 (32.1) | 93.9 (32.4) | 95.6 (35.2) | 101.9 (34.6) | 86.4 (32.8) | 96.3 (31.3) | <0.001 |
| PM10 (μg/m3) | 57.0 (35.9) | 49.4 (31.8) | 44.4 (25.5) | 46.0 (26.8) | 39.6 (23.4) | 37.1 (24.6) | <0.001 |
| PM2.5 (μg/m3) | 31.2 (20.7) | 31.3 (23.0) | 26.8 (17.6) | 26.0 (16.8) | 23.3 (16.6) | 19.8 (14.5) | <0.001 |
| Outpatients | 1015.1 (351.5) | 1092.6(393.4) | 987.3 (401.8) | 1002.8 (419.2) | 1076.0 (443.8) | 827.1 (585.6) | <0.001 |
The Spearman's rank correlation coefficient between the daily ambient air pollutant and meteorological parameters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | 1.000 | |||||||
| Humidity | 0.300 | 1.000 | ||||||
| SO2 | −0.104 | −0.325 | 1.000 | |||||
| NO2 | −0.306 | −0.126 | 0.242 | 1.000 | ||||
| CO | −0.275 | −0.079 | 0.358 | 0.324 | 1.000 | |||
| O3 | 0.147 | −0.277 | 0.147 | 0.001 | 0.065 | 1.000 | ||
| PM10 | −0.360 | −0.464 | 0.343 | 0.561 | 0.460 | 0.288 | 1.000 | |
| PM2.5 | −0.323 | −0.295 | 0.321 | 0.594 | 0.524 | 0.278 | 0.882 | 1.000 |
p < 0.01.
Figure 1Single pollutant delay effect analysis results. (A–C), respectively, show the analysis results of the single pollutant lag effect of particulate matter2.5 (PM2.5), ozone (O3), and sulfur dioxide (SO2). The horizontal axis is the concentration of the pollutants and the vertical axis is the number of days behind. A bar showing the effect on the daily internal medicine outpatient visits from blue (reduction) to red (increase).
Figure 2Non-linear relationship between the PM2.5 and daily internal medicine outpatient visits. (A,B) depict the visualization of the generalized additive model for SO2 and PM2.5. The solid curve in the middle represents a non-linear relationship between the independent variable (SO2 or PM2.5) and the outcome (outpatient visits). For the three-dimensional (3D) (C) plot, the X-axis represents PM2.5 concentration, the Y-axis represents the lag days, and the Z-axis represents the relative risk (RR).