| Literature DB >> 34765262 |
Zuoan Qin1,2, Yaoyao Du3, Quan Zhou4, Xuelin Lu5, Li Luo1, Zhixiang Zhang1, Ning Guo1, Liangqing Ge1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of the amino-terminal fragment of the prohormone brain-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been fully elucidated. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) are clinically viable indicators for the accurate, rapid, and safe evaluation of patients with STEMI. This study was designed to investigate the relationship between NT-proBNP levels and the occurrence of short-term MACEs in patients with STEMI who underwent emergency PCI.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34765262 PMCID: PMC8577951 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9943668
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiol Res Pract ISSN: 2090-0597 Impact factor: 1.866
Baseline characteristics of the participants.
| NT-proBNP (pg/mL, min to max) | Low (T1) (70–891.3) | Middle (T2) (896–2,538) | High (T3) (2,540–35,000) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number | 135 | 135 | 135 |
| Age (years, mean ± sd) | 57.27 ± 11.73 | 59.16 ± 11.33 | 64.88 ± 12.39 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| Female | 15 (11.11%) | 22 (16.3%) | 33 (24.44%) |
| Male | 120 (88.89%) | 113 (83.70%) | 102 (75.56%) |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| No | 62 (45.93%) | 68 (50.37%) | 47 (34.81%) |
| Yes | 73 (54.07%) | 67 (49.63%) | 88 (65.19%) |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| No | 90 (66.67%) | 88 (65.19%) | 92 (68.15%) |
| Yes | 45 (33.33%) | 47 (34.81%) | 43 (31.85%) |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| No | 113 (83.7%) | 105 (77.78%) | 107 (79.26%) |
| Yes | 22 (16.3%) | 30 (22.22%) | 28 (20.74%) |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| No | 131 (97.04%) | 130 (96.3%) | 126 (93.33%) |
| Yes | 4 (2.96%) | 5 (3.7%) | 9 (6.67%) |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| No | 67 (49.63%) | 85 (62.96%) | 86 (63.7%) |
| Yes | 68 (50.37%) | 50 (37.04%) | 49 (36.3%) |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| I | 125 (92.59%) | 115 (85.19%) | 89 (65.93%) |
| II | 8 (5.93%) | 11 (8.15%) | 23 (17.04%) |
| III | 1 (0.74%) | 6 (4.44%) | 15 (11.11%) |
| IV | 1 (0.74%) | 3 (2.22%) | 8 (5.93%) |
| Time from symptom onset to balloon dilatation (h; median, Q1–Q3) | 6 (4–8) | 6 (4.5–10) | 7 (5–11) |
| Time from admission to balloon dilatation (min; median, Q1–Q3) | 73 (52.5–96) | 72 (51–89) | 73 (54–98) |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| PTCA | 7 (5.19%) | 3 (2.22%) | 6 (4.44%) |
| 1-stent | 102 (75.56%) | 101 (74.81%) | 88 (65.19%) |
| 2-stent | 24 (17.78%) | 28 (20.74%) | 35 (25.93%) |
| 3-stent | 2 (1.48%) | 3 (2.22%) | 6 (4.44%) |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| 1-balloon | 111 (82.22%) | 114 (84.44%) | 104 (77.04%) |
| 2-balloon | 23 (17.04%) | 18 (13.33%) | 31 (22.96%) |
| 3-balloon | 1 (0.74%) | 3 (2.22%) | 0 (0%) |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| TIMI0 | 95 (70.37%) | 95 (70.37%) | 112 (82.96%) |
| TIMI1 | 20 (14.81%) | 23 (17.04%) | 14 (10.37%) |
| TIMI2 | 20 (14.81%) | 17 (12.59%) | 9 (6.67%) |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| TIMI0 | 2 (1.49%) | 1 (0.74%) | 0 (0%) |
| TIMI1 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.74%) |
| TIMI2 | 4 (2.99%) | 8 (5.93%) | 9 (6.67%) |
| TIMI3 | 128 (95.52%) | 126 (93.33%) | 125 (92.59%) |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| LM | 2 (1.48%) | 3 (2.22%) | 4 (2.96%) |
| LAD | 55 (40.74%) | 66 (48.89%) | 74 (54.81%) |
| LCX | 19 (14.07%) | 14 (10.37%) | 12 (8.89%) |
| RCA | 59 (43.7%) | 52 (38.52%) | 45 (33.33%) |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| No | 128 (94.81%) | 122 (90.37%) | 128 (94.81%) |
| Yes | 7 (5.19%) | 13 (9.63%) | 7 (5.19%) |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| No | 132 (97.78%) | 128 (94.81%) | 118 (87.41%) |
| Yes | 3 (2.22%) | 7 (5.19%) | 17 (12.59%) |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| No | 119 (88.15%) | 113 (83.70%) | 115 (85.19%) |
| Yes | 16 (11.85%) | 22 (16.30%) | 20 (14.81%) |
|
| |||
|
| |||
| No | 22 (16.3%) | 34 (25.19%) | 52 (38.52%) |
| Yes | 113 (83.7%) | 101 (74.81%) | 83 (61.48%) |
| CK peak value (U/L; median, Q1–Q3) | 1,874 (943.5–3,314.65) | 2,544 (1,491.5–4,349.95) | 3,032 (1,719–5,258.00) |
| CK-MB peak value (U/L; median, Q1–Q3) | 166.6 (78.1–291) | 227.6 (117.35–356.9) | 240.9 (155.7–439.4) |
| TnI peak value (U/L, median, Q1–Q3) | 5 (1.3–14.4) | 9.52 (2.4–22.67) | 12.00 (4.2–25) |
| NT-proBNP (pg/mL; median, Q1–Q3) | 485.5 (285–674.4) | 1,560 (1,139–1,962.5) | 4,896 (3,510–7,805) |
Note.P was calculated using the Kruskal–Wallis H test. We divided the NT-proBNP values of all patients into three groups using the tertiles method: low, medium, and high, namely, T1, T2, and T3. LM, left main; LAD, left anterior descending; LCX, left circumflex artery; RCA, right coronary artery; IABP, intra-aortic balloon pump; PTCA, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; CK, creatine kinase; CK-MB, creatine kinase isoenzyme-MB.
Figure 1A flowchart on how participants were selected for the final analysis.
MACE of univariate analysis.
| Statistics | YY | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Female | 70 (17.28%) | 1.0 |
| Male | 335 (82.72%) | 0.98 (0.55, 1.73) 0.9310 |
| Age (year) | 60.44 ± 12.23 | 1.03 (1.01, 1.05) 0.0021 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| PTCA | 16 (3.95%) | 1.0 |
| 1-stent | 291 (71.85%) | 0.22 (0.08, 0.62) 0.0045 |
| 2-stent | 87 (21.48%) | 0.23 (0.07, 0.70) 0.0095 |
| 3-stent | 11 (2.72%) | 0.13 (0.02, 0.84) 0.0315 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| 1-balloon | 329 (81.23%) | 1.0 |
| 2-balloon | 72 (17.78%) | 0.90 (0.50, 1.59) 0.7093 |
| 3-balloon | 4 (0.99%) | 0.83 (0.09, 8.11) 0.8752 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| No | 177 (43.70%) | 1.0 |
| Yes | 228 (56.30%) | 1.34 (0.86, 2.08) 0.1953 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| No | 270 (66.67%) | 1.0 |
| Yes | 135 (33.33%) | 0.63 (0.39, 1.02) 0.0619 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| No | 325 (80.25%) | 1.0 |
| Yes | 80 (19.75%) | 1.12 (0.65, 1.91) 0.6811 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| No | 238 (58.77%) | 1.0 |
| Yes | 167 (41.23%) | 0.66 (0.42, 1.04) 0.0732 |
| Time from symptom onset to balloon dilatation (h) | 6.94 ± 3.01 | 1.05 (0.98, 1.13) 0.1650 |
| Time from admission to balloon dilatation (min) | 75.69 ± 30.32 | 1.00 (0.99, 1.01) 0.5895 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| I | 329 (81.23%) | 1.0 |
| II | 42 (10.37%) | 2.47 (1.26, 4.83) 0.0081 |
| III | 22 (5.43%) | 9.69 (3.66, 25.67) <0.0001 |
| IV | 12 (2.96%) | 18.17 (3.89, 84.82) 0.0002 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| TIMI0 | 302 (74.57%) | 1.0 |
| TIMI1 | 57 (14.07%) | 0.99 (0.53, 1.83) 0.9629 |
| TIMI2 | 46 (11.36%) | 0.35 (0.14, 0.85) 0.0204 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| TIMI0 | 3 (0.74%) | 1.0 |
| TIMI1 | 1 (0.25%) | - |
| TIMI2 | 21 (5.20%) | 1.50 (0.12, 19.24) 0.7554 |
| TIMI3 | 379 (93.81%) | 0.75 (0.07, 8.32) 0.8120 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| LAD | 195 (48.15%) | 1.0 |
| LM | 9 (2.22%) | 8.07 (1.63, 40.00) 0.0106 |
| LCX | 45 (11.11%) | 0.75 (0.35, 1.57) 0.4405 |
| RCA | 156 (38.52%) | 0.72 (0.44, 1.16) 0.1729 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| No | 378 (93.33%) | 1.0 |
| Yes | 27 (6.67%) | 1.55 (0.69, 3.49) 0.2909 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| No | 378 (93.33%) | 1.0 |
| Yes | 27 (6.67%) | 5.87 (2.55, 13.51) <0.0001 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| No | 347 (85.68%) | 1.0 |
| Yes | 58 (14.32%) | 0.97 (0.52, 1.80) 0.9181 |
| CK peak value (U/L) | 3,089.71 ± 2,484.25 | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) 0.0021 |
| CK-MB peak value (U/L) | 270.88 ± 246.23 | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) 0.0051 |
| TnI peak value (U/L) | 11.22 ± 9.55 | 1.03 (1.01, 1.06) 0.0040 |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| No | 108 (26.67%) | 1.0 |
| Yes | 297 (73.33%) | 0.50 (0.31, 0.80) 0.0041 |
| NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | 3,050.54 ± 4,565.76 | 1.00 (1.00, 1.00) <0.0001 |
Note. -: the model failed due to the small sample. ST-segment resolution: ST elevation of the IRA after surgery from that before surgery, which was then divided by the ST elevation before surgery.
Relationship between Log NT-ProBNP and MACE in different models.
| Variable | Nonadjusted1 ( | Adjusted I ( | Adjusted II ( |
|---|---|---|---|
| Log NT-proBNP (pg/mL) | 1.63 (1.40, 1.89, <0.0001) | 1.60 (1.37, 1.86, <0.0001) | 1.50 (1.26, 1.78, <0.0001) |
|
| |||
| Log NT-proBNP (pg/mL) (quartile) | |||
| T1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| T2 | 1.55 (0.84, 2.88, 0.1636) | 1.53 (0.82, 2.85, 0.1793) | 1.24 (0.63, 2.46, 0.5390) |
| T3 | 4.75 (2.67, 8.44, <0.0001) | 4.38 (2.42, 7.93, <0.0001) | 3.31 (1.69, 6.48, 0.0005) |
| P For trend | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
1Nonadjusted model. Adjusted model I: adjusted for age and sex. Adjusted model II: adjusted for age, sex, number of implanted stents, number of the used balloons, pre-PCI TIMI grade, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, smoking, time from admission to balloon dilatation, Killip class, post-PCI TIMI grade, and TIMI risk score.
Figure 2The nonlinear relationship between Log2 NT-proBNP and MACE.
Piecewise linear regression model was used to detect the association of Log2 NT-ProBNP and MACE according to the Log NT-proBNP cutoff points.
| Cutoff points | Hazard ratio | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤11.66 | 1.07 | 0.84–1.36 | 0.5730 |
| >11.66 | 3.47 | 2.06–5.85 | <0.0001 |
Adjusted variables: sex, age, number of implanted stents, number of balloons used, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, smoking, time from symptom onset to balloon dilatation, time from admission to balloon dilatation, Killip class, post-PCI TIMI grade, and TIMI risk score.