| Literature DB >> 34764713 |
I-Chun Kuo1,2, Li-Jen Hsin1,2, Li-Ang Lee1,2, Tuan-Jen Fang1,2, Ming-Shao Tsai2,3, Yi-Chan Lee2,4, Shih-Chieh Shen2,5, Hsueh-Yu Li1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the factors that contribute to epiglottic collapse (EC) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).Entities:
Keywords: drug-induced sleep computed tomography; epiglottic collapse; epiglottic length; hyoid bone movement; obstructive sleep apnea
Year: 2021 PMID: 34764713 PMCID: PMC8573216 DOI: 10.2147/NSS.S336019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Sci Sleep ISSN: 1179-1608
Figure 1The epiglottic length (from the free edge to the base of the epiglottis) and the epiglottic angle (the angle between the long axis of the epiglottis and the vertical plane) are measured using ImageJ software.
Figure 2Images of the midsagittal view from drug-induced sleep computed tomography were collected and categorized into (A) epiglottic collapse (attach to the posterior pharyngeal wall) and (B) non-epiglottic collapse.
Figure 3Endoscopic classification for collapsibility of epiglottis. (A) Type I, the whole glottis is visible; (B) Type II, only the posterior glottis is visible; (C) Type III, the glottis is obscured by the epiglottis.
Demographics
| Non-epiglottic Collapse | Epiglottic Collapse | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | ||
| Age | 38.0 (24.0–50.0) | 39.5 (30.0–67.0) | 0.689 |
| Sex (M/F) | 23/0 | 11/1 | 0.343 |
| AHI | 56.3 (15.0–97.6) | 50.2 (22.5–122.1) | 0.848 |
| BMI | 27.0 (22.1–32.8) | 25.4 (19.6–31.4) | 0.258 |
Note: Statistical significance: p < 0.05.
Figure 4(A) A longer epiglottis length is prone to epiglottic collapse during drug-induced sleep computed tomography (21.2 vs 15.8 mm; p < 0.001). (B) No statistical significance is found in the angle of epiglottis (38.6° vs 36.2°; p = 0.41) between epiglottic collapse and non-epiglottic collapse patients.
Figure 5The cutoff value of the length of the epiglottis is 16.6 mm (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 65.22%; Youden index: 0.65; area under the ROC curve: 0.88; p < 0.0001).
Figure 6A significantly higher hyoid bone movement is seen in patients with epiglottic collapse than non-epiglottic collapse in drug-induced sleep computed tomography (4.8 vs 3.0 mm; p = 0.027).