Literature DB >> 34764556

A novel agent-based, evolutionary model for expressing the dynamics of creative open-problem solving in small groups.

Alex Doboli1, Simona Doboli2.   

Abstract

Understanding the process of producing creative responses to open-ended problems solved in small groups is important for many modern domains, like health care, manufacturing, education, banking, and investment. Some of the main theoretical challenges include characterizing and measuring the dynamics of responses, relating social and individual aspects in group problem solving, incorporating soft skills (e.g., experience, social aspects, and emotions) to the theory of decision making in groups, and understanding the evolution of processes guided by soft utilities (hard-to-quantify utilities), e.g., social interactions and emotional rewards. This paper presents a novel theoretical model (TM) that describes the process of solving open-ended problems in small groups. It mathematically presents the connection between group member characteristics, interactions in a group, group knowledge evolution, and overall novelty of the responses created by a group as a whole. Each member is modeled as an agent with local knowledge, a way of interpreting the knowledge, resources, social skills, and emotional levels associated to problem goals and concepts. Five solving strategies can be employed by an agent to generate new knowledge. Group responses form a solution space, in which responses are grouped into categories based on their similarity and organized in abstraction levels. The solution space includes concrete features and samples, as well as the causal sequences that logically connect concepts with each other. The model was used to explain how member characteristics, e.g., the degree to which their knowledge is similar, relate to the solution novelty of the group. Model validation compared model simulations against results obtained through behavioral experiments with teams of human subjects, and suggests that TMs are a useful tool in improving the effectiveness of small teams. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agent model; Groups; Knowledge evolution; Modeling; Problem solving

Year:  2020        PMID: 34764556      PMCID: PMC7588593          DOI: 10.1007/s10489-020-01919-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Intell (Dordr)        ISSN: 0924-669X            Impact factor:   5.086


  15 in total

Review 1.  Quantifying collectivity.

Authors:  Bryan C Daniels; Christopher J Ellison; David C Krakauer; Jessica C Flack
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers.

Authors:  Lu Hong; Scott E Page
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  How the group affects the mind: a cognitive model of idea generation in groups.

Authors:  Bernard A Nijstad; Wolfgang Stroebe
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2006

4.  Atypical combinations and scientific impact.

Authors:  Brian Uzzi; Satyam Mukherjee; Michael Stringer; Ben Jones
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams.

Authors:  Steve W J Kozlowski; Daniel R Ilgen
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2006-12-01

6.  Group heterogeneity increases the risks of large group size: a longitudinal study of productivity in research groups.

Authors:  Jonathon N Cummings; Sara Kiesler; Reza Bosagh Zadeh; Aruna D Balakrishnan
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-04-10

7.  Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations.

Authors:  Rachid Laajaj; Karen Macours; Daniel Alejandro Pinzon Hernandez; Omar Arias; Samuel D Gosling; Jeff Potter; Marta Rubio-Codina; Renos Vakis
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  The Underlying Social Dynamics of Paradigm Shifts.

Authors:  Carlos Rodriguez-Sickert; Diego Cosmelli; Francisco Claro; Miguel Angel Fuentes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Introduction of a Framework for Dynamic Knowledge Representation of the Control Structure of Transplant Immunology: Employing the Power of Abstraction with a Solid Organ Transplant Agent-Based Model.

Authors:  Gary An
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  The strength of the strongest ties in collaborative problem solving.

Authors:  Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye; Arkadiusz Stopczynski; Erez Shmueli; Alex Pentland; Sune Lehmann
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.