| Literature DB >> 34764546 |
Youssoufa Mohamadou1,2, Aminou Halidou3, Pascalin Tiam Kapen2,4,5.
Abstract
In the past few months, several works were published in regards to the dynamics and early detection of COVID-19 via mathematical modeling and Artificial intelligence (AI). The aim of this work is to provide the research community with comprehensive overview of the methods used in these studies as well as a compendium of available open source datasets in regards to COVID-19. In all, 61 journal articles, reports, fact sheets, and websites dealing with COVID-19 were studied and reviewed. It was found that most mathematical modeling done were based on the Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Removed (SEIR) and Susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) models while most of the AI implementations were Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) on X-ray and CT images. In terms of available datasets, they include aggregated case reports, medical images, management strategies, healthcare workforce, demography, and mobility during the outbreak. Both Mathematical modeling and AI have both shown to be reliable tools in the fight against this pandemic. Several datasets concerning the COVID-19 have also been collected and shared open source. However, much work is needed to be done in the diversification of the datasets. Other AI and modeling applications in healthcare should be explored in regards to this COVID-19. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.Entities:
Keywords: Artificial intelligence; COVID-19; Corona virus; Mathematical modeling; Open source dataset
Year: 2020 PMID: 34764546 PMCID: PMC7335662 DOI: 10.1007/s10489-020-01770-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Intell (Dordr) ISSN: 0924-669X Impact factor: 5.086
The breakdown of the review showing number of items covered per part
| Part | Items | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical Modeling | 19 | Modeling of CoVID-19 epidemic dynamics and propagation, Climate and environment effect on CoViD-19 spreading, Modeling of the effect of management strategies on COVID-19 spreading |
| Artificial Intelligence | 18 | Image based (X-ray, CT) AI CoViD-19 detection and classification, Text based AI CoViD-19 detection and classification, physiological data based AI CoViD-19 detection and classification |
| Datasets | 24 | Prevalance rate, medical images, Text (social media), demography |
Summary of the various mathematical models used in COVID-19 studies
| No. | Model | COVID-19 studies | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Removed (SEIR) | Dynamics, prediction, management strategies, Effect of temperature and humidity levels | [ |
| 2 | Susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) | Track transmission and recovering rates in time, data fitting, management strategies | [ |
| 3 | Susceptible-Infectious-Quarantined-Recovered (SIQR) | Quarantine, management strategies | [ |
| 4 | Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Quarantined-Recovered (SEIQR) | Prediction, management strategies | [ |
| 5 | Bats-Hosts-Reservoir-People transmission network (BHRP) | Simulate transmission from the bats to human | [ |
| 6 | Susceptible-Exposed-Symptomatic-Asymptomatic-Recovered-seafood Market (SEIARW) | Age dependent Transmissibility, prediction | [ |
| 7 | Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) | Effects of self-protective measures | [ |
| 8 | SPSS modeler | Effect of temperature levels | [ |
| 9 | ODE metapopulation model | COVID-19 and economics | [ |
Summary of the classifications methods used in COVID-19 studies
| AI | Methods | Images | Patients | Dataset | Accuracy | Sensitivity | PPV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNN | COVID-Net [ | 13,800 | 13,725 | COVIDx test | 92.6% | 87.1% | 96.4% |
| CNN | ResNet50 ; InceptionV3 ; Inception-ResNetV2 [ | 100 | 50 | GitHub | 98% ; 97% ; 87% | – | – |
| CNN | COVNet [ | 4356 | 3,322 | proprietatry | 87% | – | |
| CNN | Deep Learning with X-ray [ | 448 | – | proprietatry | 96.78% | 98.66% | – |
| CNN | COVIDX-Net (VGG19 and DenseNet201) [ | 50 | 25 | proprietatry | 90% | – | – |
| SVM | Barstugan [ | 150 | 53 | proprietatry | 99.68% | – | – |
| SVM | ResNet50 and SVM [ | 158 | – | GitHub, Kaggle and Open-i | 95.38% | 97. 29% | – |
| SVM | SVM and Random Forests [ | – | 235 | Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein in São Paulo | 84.7% | 6.77% | 77.8% |
| SVM | MLT and SVM [ | 40 | Montgomery County X-ray Set and covid-chestxray-Set and covid-chestxray-dataset-master | 97.48% | 95.76% | 99.7% | |
| LR | Kunhua [ | – | 83 | proprietatry | 87% | 80% | 82.8% |
| LR | SMOTE [ | 5840 | 88 | Chest X-Ray Images (Pneumonia)1 and COVID-19 public dataset from Italy | 96.6% | 96.7% | 98.3% |
| NB | Probabilistic Model [ | 51 | Kaggle benchmark dataset | 99.4% | – | – | |
| LDA | NLR&RDW-SD [ | – | 45 | Jingzhou Central Hospital | 85.7% | 90.0% | 84.7% |
| DT/RF | RF based model [ | – | 176 | proprietatry | 87.5% | – | 93.3% |
| DT/RF | SMOTE [ | 5840 | 88 | Chest X-Ray Images (Pneumonia)1 and COVID-19 public dataset from Italy | 93.1% | 93.2% | 96.5 |
| DT/RF | iSARF [ | – | 1658 | 3 University Hospitals (Tongji,Shanghai,Fudan) | 87.9% | 90.7% | – |
| k-NNA | SMOTE [ | 5840 | 88 | Chest X-Ray Images (Pneumonia)1 and COVID-19 public dataset from Italy | 94.7% | 94.7% | 97.4% |
| U-Net | Modified U-Net structure [ | 110 | 60 | SIRM | 79% | – | 83% |
| U-Net | Attention U-Net with an adversarial critic model [ | 1047 | 641 | JSRT, Montgomery, and Shenzhen | 96% | – | – |
| InfNet | InfNet and the Semi-Inf-Net [ | 1600 | – | CCOVID-19 CT Segmentation and COVID-19 CT/X-ray Collection | – | 72.5% | – |
A collection of the open source dataset sources and their links
| No. | Dataset name | Data type | Link | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | COVID-19 | Text, values(Prevalence) | – | |
| 2 | n-CoV 2019 | Text, numbers (Prevalence) | – | |
| 3 | COVID-19 image data collection | chest X-ray or CT images | 345 | |
| 4 | COVID-CT-Dataset: A CT Scan Dataset about COVID-19 | CT images | 398 | |
| 5 | COVID-19-CT-Seg-Benchmark | CT images of Lungs | 525 | |
| 6 | COVID-19 CT t segmentation datase | CT images | 100 | |
| 7 | Segmentation dataset nr. 2 | CT images | 829 | |
| 8 | COVID-19-TweetIDs | Text (Social media) | 100 million | |
| 9 | CORONA VIRUS (COVID-19) TWEETS DATASET | Text (Social media) | 30 million | 10.21227/781w-ef42 |
| 10 | China datalab “Global News” | Text (News) | – | 10.7910/DVN/TU0JDP |
| 11 | China datalab “Climate” | Values (Climatic data) | – | 10.7910/DVN/XETLSS |
| 12 | Coronacases Initiative | 3D CT images | 10 | |
| 13 | WorldPop | Values (Demography) | – | |
| 14 | HDX | Text, values (Humanitarian) | 18,064 | |
| 15 | WHO Global Health Workforce Statistics | Values (Health workforce) | – | |
| 16 | Apple Mobility Trends Report | Values (Mobility data) | – | |
| 17 | Google COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports | Values (Mobility data) | – | |
| 18 | Our World in Data | Values (COVID-19 testing data) | – | |
| 19 | ACAPS | Text and Values (Management measures) | – | |
| 20 | The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED) | Values (Security incidents) | – | |
| 21 | The International Monetary Fund (IMF) | Values (Ecominic outlook) | – | |
| 22 | BFA Global | Values (Ecominic outlook) | – | |
| 23 | C3.ai COVID-19 Data Lake | Various | – | |
| 24 | COVID-19 Imaging-based AI Research Collection | Data, literature | – |
‡The Dataset sizes are all as of May 01, 2020