| Literature DB >> 34764461 |
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers1, Alexandra Sarafoglou2, Sil Aarts3, Casper Albers4, Johannes Algermissen5, Štěpán Bahník6, Noah van Dongen2, Rink Hoekstra7, David Moreau8, Don van Ravenzwaaij9, Aljaž Sluga10, Franziska Stanke11, Jorge Tendeiro9,12, Balazs Aczel13.
Abstract
We argue that statistical practice in the social and behavioural sciences benefits from transparency, a fair acknowledgement of uncertainty and openness to alternative interpretations. Here, to promote such a practice, we recommend seven concrete statistical procedures: (1) visualizing data; (2) quantifying inferential uncertainty; (3) assessing data preprocessing choices; (4) reporting multiple models; (5) involving multiple analysts; (6) interpreting results modestly; and (7) sharing data and code. We discuss their benefits and limitations, and provide guidelines for adoption. Each of the seven procedures finds inspiration in Merton's ethos of science as reflected in the norms of communalism, universalism, disinterestedness and organized scepticism. We believe that these ethical considerations-as well as their statistical consequences-establish common ground among data analysts, despite continuing disagreements about the foundations of statistical inference.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34764461 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01211-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Hum Behav ISSN: 2397-3374