Literature DB >> 34762249

Study on augmented reality for robotic surgery bedside assistants.

Camille Linick Stewart1,2, Abigail Fong3, Govinda Payyavula4, Simon DiMaio4, Kelly Lafaro5, Kirsten Tallmon1, Sherry Wren6, Jonathan Sorger4, Yuman Fong7.   

Abstract

Robotic surgery bedside assistants play an important role in robotic procedures by performing intra-corporeal tasks while accommodating the physical presence of the robot. We hypothesized that an augmented reality headset enabling 3D intra-corporeal vision while facing the surgical field could decrease time and improve accuracy of robotic bedside tasks. Bedside assistants (one physician assistant, one medical student, three surgical trainees, and two attending surgeons) performed validated tasks within a mock abdominal cavity with a surgical robot docked. Tasks were performed with a bedside monitor providing 2D or 3D vision, or an optical see-through head-mounted augmented reality device with 2D or 3D vision. The effect of augmented reality device resolution on performance was also evaluated. For the simplest task of touching a straw, performance was generally high, regardless of mode of visualization. With more complex tasks, including stapling and pulling a ring along a path, 3D augmented reality decreased time and number of errors per task. 3D augmented reality allowed the physician assistant to perform at the level of an attending surgeon using 3D augmented reality (p = 0.08). All participants had improved times for the ring path task with better resolution (lower resolution 23 ± 11 s vs higher resolution 14 ± 4 s, p = 0.002). 3D augmented reality vision with high resolution decreased time and improved accuracy of more complex tasks, enabling a less experienced robotic surgical bedside assistant to function similar to attending surgeons. These data warrant further study with additional complex tasks and bedside assistants at various levels of training.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmented reality; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic surgery; Video display; Video-assisted surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34762249     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01335-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  2 in total

1.  Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional imaging during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Sian Davies; Mohammed Ghallab; Shahab Hajibandeh; Shahin Hajibandeh; Sarah Addison
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Learning curves, potential and speed in training of laparoscopic skills: a randomised comparative study in a box trainer.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kunert; Pirmin Storz; Nicolaus Dietz; Steffen Axt; Claudius Falch; Andreas Kirschniak; Peter Wilhelm
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Robot-assisted liver resection: the real benefit so far.

Authors:  Reed I Ayabe; Ahad Azimuddin; Hop S Tran Cao
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Augmenting Performance: A Systematic Review of Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays in Surgery.

Authors:  Mitchell Doughty; Nilesh R Ghugre; Graham A Wright
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-07-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.