Literature DB >> 34762100

Changes in Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Relative to the Revised US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation on Prostate Cancer Screening.

Michael S Leapman1,2, Rong Wang2,3, Henry Park2,4, James B Yu2,4, Preston C Sprenkle1, Matthew R Cooperberg5,6, Cary P Gross2,7, Xiaomei Ma2,3.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: In April 2017, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) published a draft guideline that reversed its 2012 guidance advising against prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer in all men (grade D), instead endorsing individual decision-making for men aged 55 to 69 years (grade C).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in rates of PSA testing after revisions in the USPSTF guideline on prostate cancer screening. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study used deidentified claims data from Blue Cross Blue Shield beneficiaries aged 40 to 89 years from January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2019. EXPOSURES: Publication of the USPSTF's draft (April 2017) and final (May 2018) recommendation on prostate cancer screening. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Age-adjusted rates of PSA testing in bimonthly periods were calculated, and PSA testing rates from calendar years before (January 1 to December 31, 2016) and after (January 1 to December 31, 2019) the guideline change were compared. Interrupted time series analyses were used to evaluate the association of the draft (April 2017) and published (May 2018) USPSTF guideline with rates of PSA testing. Changes in rates of PSA testing were further evaluated among beneficiaries within the age categories reflected in the guideline: 40 to 54 years, 55 to 69 years, and 70 to 89 years.
RESULTS: The median number of eligible beneficiaries for each bimonthly period was 8 087 565 (range, 6 407 602-8 747 308), and the median age of all included eligible beneficiaries was 53 years (IQR, 47-59 years). Between 2016 and 2019, the mean (SD) rate of PSA testing increased from 32.5 (1.1) to 36.5 (1.1) tests per 100 person-years, a relative increase of 12.5% (95% CI, 1.1%-24.4%). During the same period, mean (SD) rates of PSA testing increased from 20.6 (0.8) to 22.7 (0.9) tests per 100 person-years among men aged 40 to 54 years (relative increase, 10.1%; 95% CI, -2.8% to 23.7%), from 49.8 (1.9) to 55.8 (1.8) tests per 100 person-years among men aged 55 to 69 years (relative increase, 12.1%; 95% CI, -0.2% to 25.2%), and from 38.0 (1.4) to 44.2 (1.4) tests per 100 person-years among men aged 70 to 89 years (relative increase, 16.2%; 95% CI, 4.2%-29.0%). Interrupted time series analysis revealed a significantly increasing trend of PSA testing after April 2017 among all beneficiaries (0.30 tests per 100 person-years for each bimonthly period; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This large national cohort study found that rates of PSA testing increased after the USPSTF's draft statement in 2017, reversing trends seen after earlier guidance against PSA testing for all patients. Increased testing was also observed among older men, who may be less likely to benefit from prostate cancer screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34762100      PMCID: PMC8587214          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  5 in total

1.  Trends in Urethral Suspension With Robotic Prostatectomy Procedures Following Medicare Payment Policy Changes.

Authors:  Jonathan Li; Dattatraya Patil; Benjamin J Davies; Christopher P Filson
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-10-03

Review 2.  Grade Migration of Prostate Cancer in the United States During the Last Decade.

Authors:  Leonardo D Borregales; Gina DeMeo; Xiangmei Gu; Emily Cheng; Vanessa Dudley; Edward M Schaeffer; Himanshu Nagar; Sigrid Carlsson; Andrew Vickers; Jim C Hu
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 11.816

3.  Number of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening tests in the last five years reported by men in the United States in 2010, 2015, and 2018.

Authors:  Thomas B Richards; Shifan Dai; Simone C Gray; Ingrid J Hall; David A Siegel
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 2.954

4.  Commentary: Kappen S, Jürgens V, Freitag MH, Winter A. Attitudes Toward and Use of Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing Among Urologists and General Practitioners in Germany: A Survey.

Authors:  Kay-Patrick Braun; Ingmar Wolff; Steffen Lebentrau; Matthias May
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Should Contemporary Western Guidelines Based on Studies Conducted in the 2000s Be Adopted for the Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening Policy for Asian Men in the 2020s?

Authors:  Young Hwii Ko; Byung Hoon Kim
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.494

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.