| Literature DB >> 34760759 |
Gopika Vinayachandran1, Namita Patel1, Vijayageetha Mathavaswami1, L Subitha1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Consuming larger portion sizes, i.e., in excess of a typically recommended serving size, has been attributed to the obesity epidemic. The workplace acts as an efficient target for health promotion activities. AIMS: To assess the effectiveness of a food portion size educational programme in increasing knowledge among the employees of a software company in Puducherry.Entities:
Keywords: Food portion size; healthy diet; self-regulation; workplace intervention
Year: 2021 PMID: 34760759 PMCID: PMC8565166 DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_849_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Family Med Prim Care ISSN: 2249-4863
Sociodemographic characteristics and dietary patterns of employees at a selected software company in urban Puducherry (n=120)
| Categories | Mean (SD)/Median (IQR) | Frequency (Percentage) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (in years) | 27 (±5) | |
| Height (in cm) | 158.3 (±16.4) | |
| Weight (in kg) | 63.9 (±14.2) | |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 72 (60.0) | |
| Female | 48 (40.0) | |
| Body Mass Index (kg/m2)* ( | ||
| Underweight (<18.5) | 11 (9.2) | |
| Normal (18.5-22.9) | 31 (27.0) | |
| Overweight (23-24.9) | 18 (15.7) | |
| Obese (>=25) | 55 (47.8) | |
| History of Chronic Morbidity$ | ||
| Yes | 9 (7.5) | |
| No | 111 (92.5) | |
| Meals consumed | 3 (1-3) | |
| Snacks consumed | 1 (1-2) | |
| Second servings during meal | 48 (40.0) | |
| Restricted diet | 110 (91.7) |
*Body mass index-Asia Pacific Classification.28 $Chronic morbidity includes diabetes, hypertension, thyroid
Self-regulation in eating behaviour as assessed by SREBQ (Self-Regulation of Eating Behaviour Questionnaire) (n=120)
| Give up easily on eating intentions | 59 (49) |
| Good at resisting food | 43 (36) |
| Easily get distracted from the intended diet | 62 (52) |
| Not happy with current eating behaviour, intends to make changes | 53 (44) |
| Has difficulty remembering past meals | 60 (50) |
*Multiple responses
Factors determining the amount of food consumed by employees at a selected software company in urban Puducherry (n=120)
| Factors and categories | |
|---|---|
| Influencers for the amount of food consumed | |
| Situational | 54 (45.0) |
| Environmental | 28 (23.3) |
| Food-related | 63 (52.5) |
| Fixed portions served | 12 (10.0) |
| Influencers for overeating | |
| Eat out with friends | 48 (40.0) |
| Weddings/Parties | 29 (24.0) |
| Weekends | 36 (30.0) |
| Others | 15 (12.5) |
| Concurrent activities* | |
| Breakfast | 43 (35.8) |
| Lunch | 54 (45.0) |
| Dinner | 74 (61.7) |
| Perceived importance of controlled portion size | 78 (65.0) |
*Activities like reading newspaper, watching TV, using phone
Figure 1Comparison of knowledge scores on the portion size before and after the intervention (P < 0.05)