Literature DB >> 34760509

Selective versus universal third trimester ultrasound: Time for a rethink? An audit of current practices at a metropolitan Sydney hospital.

Kristina King1, Jinny Foo1, Kirsty Hazelton2, Amanda Henry3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Routine third-trimester ultrasound (T3US) is not recommended in evidence-based clinical guidelines despite occurring frequently. This study investigated the incidence, indication for, results and follow-up needs of T3US performed at a Sydney metropolitan teaching hospital.
METHODS: Audit of T3US amongst singleton pregnancies at St George Hospital, Sydney: retrospective review October-December 2012, prospective cohort with clinician survey February-April 2013. Data included are as follows: maternal demographics, aneuploidy screening results, T3US ordering patterns, results, follow-up management and pregnancy outcomes. Comparison of demographic characteristics and pregnancy outcomes was performed for women undergoing T3US vs. no T3US.
RESULTS: One thousand and thirty-five women (623 retrospective, 412 prospective) were included, of whom 560 (54%) received at least one T3US. Characteristics of retrospective and prospective cohorts were similar, so combined data are presented. Most initial T3USs were for valid indications (463 of 560; 83%), most frequently low-lying placenta at morphology (19%), reduced fundal height (10%) and to follow-up fetal concerns at morphology ultrasound (9%). One hundred and sixty-two out of 560 (29%) of initial T3US were not normal, predominantly related to accelerated or reduced fetal growth. Detection of SGA babies was significantly higher in the T3US group (32% SGA babies detected vs. 0% if no T3US, P < 0.001). However, overall detection rates remained low, with 5.2% and 3.0% of babies who had a T3US unexpectedly <10th and <3rd centile birthweight, respectively. DISCUSSION/
CONCLUSION: The majority of women received at least one, usually indicated, T3US in routine practice at our metropolitan Sydney hospital. This may impact obstetric care, resource allocation and patient well-being. Detection of small for gestational age fetuses was poor.
© 2018 Australasian Society for Ultrasound in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  pregnancy; small for gestational age; third trimester; ultrasound

Year:  2018        PMID: 34760509      PMCID: PMC8411926          DOI: 10.1002/ajum.12082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 1836-6864


  27 in total

1.  US evaluation of fetal growth: prediction of neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Philip W Chu; Jeffrey L Ecker; Vickie A Feldstein; Roy A Filly; Peter Bacchetti
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Routine ultrasound fetal examination in pregnancy: the 'Alesund' randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S H Eik-Nes; K A Salvesen; O Okland; L J Vatten
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome?

Authors:  P G Lindqvist; J Molin
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 4.  Routine third trimester ultrasound: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Camille Le Ray; Maxime Lacerte; Marie-Hélène Iglesias; François Audibert; Lucie Morin
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2008-02

5.  Third trimester placental grading by ultrasonography as a test of fetal wellbeing.

Authors:  J Proud; A M Grant
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-06-27

6.  Optimizing the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: the multicenter prospective PORTO Study.

Authors:  Julia Unterscheider; Sean Daly; Michael Patrick Geary; Mairead Mary Kennelly; Fionnuala Mary McAuliffe; Keelin O'Donoghue; Alyson Hunter; John Joseph Morrison; Gerard Burke; Patrick Dicker; Elizabeth Catherine Tully; Fergal Desmond Malone
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  A randomized trial using ultrasound to identify the high-risk fetus in a low-risk population.

Authors:  Daniel McKenna; Suresh Tharmaratnam; Samina Mahsud; Carolyn Bailie; Ann Harper; James Dornan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  A randomized controlled trial in a hospital population of ultrasound measurement screening for the small for dates baby.

Authors:  G B Duff
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.100

9.  Effect of prenatal ultrasound screening on perinatal outcome. RADIUS Study Group.

Authors:  B G Ewigman; J P Crane; F D Frigoletto; M L LeFevre; R P Bain; D McNellis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-16       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Uncomplicated Pregnancies and Ultrasounds for Fetal Growth Restriction: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ibrahim A Hammad; Suneet P Chauhan; Malgorzata Mlynarczyk; Nader Rabie; Chris Goodie; Eugene Chang; Everett F Magann; Alfred Z Abuhamad
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2015-11-16
View more
  1 in total

1.  A survey of current practice in reporting third trimester fetal biometry and Doppler in Australia and New Zealand.

Authors:  Debra Paoletti; Lillian Smyth; Susan Westerway; Jon Hyett; Ritu Mogra; Stephen Haslett; Michael Peek
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2021-08-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.