| Literature DB >> 34760353 |
Hajar Faal1,2, Peter J Silk3, Peter D Mayo3, Stephen A Teale1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ibalia leucospoides (Hymenoptera: Ibaliidae) is a larval parasitoid that has been widely introduced as a biological control agent for the invasive woodwasp,Sirex noctilio (Hymenoptera: Siricidae) in the Southern Hemisphere. In this study, the courtship behavior and identificaion of sex pheromones are described for I. leucospoides under laboratory conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Courtship behavior; Cuticular hydrocarbon; Ibaliidae; Parasitoid; Sex pheromone
Year: 2021 PMID: 34760353 PMCID: PMC8572519 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12266
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Components of each blend used in behavioral assays for male Ibalia leucospoides.
| Component | Amount (ng) | Blends | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| (Z,Z) 6,9, heptadecadiene | 1.4 | × | |||||
| Tricosane | 3.25 | × | × | × | × | × | |
| Pentacosane | 275 | × | × | × | × | × | |
| Hexacosane | 1000 | × | × | × | × | × | |
| Heptacosane | 1450 | × | × | × | × | × | |
Notes.
Each blend used in each olfactometer assay was equal to 0.25 Female Equivalent.
Body sizes of Ibalia leucospoides males (n = 32) and females (n = 24).
| Sex | Body size | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thorax | Abdomen | Total Surface | |||||||
| Length | Width | Depth | Surface Area | Length | Width | Depth | Surface Area | ||
| Female | 2.98 ± 0.15 | 1.60 ± 0.09 | 1.71 ± 0.08 | 12.9 ± 1.18 a | 5.77 ± 0.22 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 2.31 ± 0.12 | 20.4 ± 1.64 a | 34.61 ± 2.77 a |
| Male | 2.83 ± 0.08 | 1.54 ± 0.06 | 1.66 ± 0.05 | 12.6 ± 0.66 a | 4.72 ± 0.14 | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 1.88 ± 0.04 | 14.3 ± 0.66 b | 26.9 ± 1.26 b |
Notes.
Includes propodeum.
The relative body surface area was calculated for both thorax and abdomen, which were both assumed to be a prolate ellipsoid (Wang & Messing, 2004; Macias-Ordonez & Draud, 2005; Wang et al., 2016).
Values (mean ± S.E.) followed by the same letter within each column were not significantly different (Student two-tailed t test, P > 0.05).
Electrophysiologically active components of female Ibalia leucospoides body washes.
| Component | Kovat’s index | Females | Males | t (P) | Ratios Male/Female |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount ( | |||||
| (6 | 1670 (1662 | 0.03 ± 0.0 a | 0.00 ± 0.0 b | 2.93 (<0.001) | 0.04 |
| Tricosane | 2300 (2300 | 0.06 ± 0.01 a | 0.04 ± 0.0 a | 0.99 (0.32) | 0.66 |
| Pentacosane | 2500 (2500 | 5.4 ± 0.6 a | 2.5 ± 0.2 b | 3.95 (<0.001) | 0.46 |
| Hexacosane | 2600 (2600 | 20 ± 2.3 a | 11.3 ± 0.8 b | 4.42 (<0.001) | 0.56 |
| Heptacosane | 2700 (2700 | 29 ± 3.4 a | 26.7 ± 2.5 a | 0.08 (0.94) | 0.92 |
| Component 1 | 2460 (2465 | 9.2 ± 1.1 a | 4.4 ± 0.4 b | 3.92 (<0.001) | 0.48 |
| Component 2 | 2670 (2665 | 78.1 ± 8.4 a | 56 ± 5 a | 0.85 (0.39) | 0.72 |
Notes.
The calculated Kovat’s indices of compounds eluted on a non-polar HP5-MS column.
Amount of each component and standard errors correspond to those found in individual body wash extracts.
Tsai et al. (2019).
Zgheib et al. (2020).
Zaikin & Borisov (2002).
Hedlund et al. (1996).
Values (mean ± S.E.) were compared after adjusting for sexual dimorphism in surface area. Values with the same letter within each row were not significantly different (Student two-tailed t test, P > 0.05).
Components 1 and 2 were quantified using the authentic samples of pentacosane and hexacosane as external standards.
Figure 1Representative coupled gas chromatography-electroantennogram detection analysis of body wash extracts of Ibalia leucospoides female (A) and male (B), using antennae from I. leucospoides males.
Figure 2Representative total ion chromatograms from GC-MS analysis of body wash extracts of Ibalia leucospoides females (A) and males (B).
Figure 3Percentage of Ibalia leucospoides male responses to different stimuli in olfactometer assays.
The authentic blends were prepared at the same concentrations and ratios found in body wash extracts of individual I. leucospoides females. Table 1 provides the composition of each blend. The number of insects that responded to the stimuli are noted next to the corresponding bar. The P-value, percent responding (Resp.%), and total number of wasps for each trial is presented adjacent to the corresponding bar. The significant differences at α =0.05 are indicated by asterisks.