| Literature DB >> 34759480 |
Jayshree Tolani1, Venu Tejas Shah2, Nitinkumar D Shah3, Prutha Bakul Desai4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Poor sleep quality harms the ability to think, lowers stress, and sustains a healthy immune system. The present study assessed sleep quality and its determinants in adult population using discriminant function analysis (DFA) in Ahmedabad city, Gujarat.Entities:
Keywords: Determinants; discriminant function analysis; general adult population; sleep quality
Year: 2021 PMID: 34759480 PMCID: PMC8575205 DOI: 10.4103/ijcm.IJCM_533_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Community Med ISSN: 0970-0218
Percent distribution as per Pittsburgh sleep quality index variables (PSQI) among study population (n=600)
| PSQI Variables | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Subjective sleep quality | |
| Very good | 89.8 |
| Fairly good | 10.2 |
| Sleep latency (h) | |
| <1 | 54.5 |
| 1-2 | 40.7 |
| 3-4 | 4.8 |
| Sleep duration (h) | |
| >7 | 34.7 |
| 6-7 | 54.8 |
| 5-6 | 9.2 |
| <5 | 1.3 |
| Sleep efficiency (%) | |
| >85 | 28.0 |
| 75-84 | 59.3 |
| <75 | 12.7 |
| Sleep disturbance | |
| 1-9 | 73.8 |
| 10-18 | 24.8 |
| 19-27 | 1.3 |
| Use of Sleep medication | |
| Not needed in the past week | 75.0 |
| Less than once a week | 17.0 |
| Once or twice a week | 6.0 |
| Three or more times a week | 2.0 |
| Daytime dysfunction | |
| Less than once a week | 47.8 |
| Once or twice a week | 45.0 |
| Three or more times a week | 7.2 |
Percent distributions of determinants of sleep quality among good and poor sleepers
| Determinants of sleep quality | PSQI | Total | Cramer’s V ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Good sleepers ( | Poor sleepers ( | |||
| Age (years) | ||||
| 18-29 | 106 (65.4) | 56 (34.6) | 162 | 0.074 (0.349) |
| 30-39 | 129 (74.1) | 45 (25.9) | 174 | |
| 40-49 | 103 (67.3) | 49 (32.2) | 152 | |
| 50-59 | 76 (67.9) | 36 (32.1) | 112 | |
| Gender | ||||
| Female | 162 (78.3) | 45 (21.7) | 207 | 0.1453 (0.0004)* |
| Male | 252 (64.1) | 141 (35.9) | 393 | |
| Education | ||||
| Primary | 10 (100.0) | 0 | 10 | 0.2060 (<0.0001)* |
| Secondary | 10 (100.0) | 0 | 10 | |
| Higher secondary | 59 (52.2) | 56 (47.8) | 115 | |
| Graduate and above | 335 (71.7) | 130 (28.3) | 463 | |
| Marital status | ||||
| Married | 283 (68.9) | 128 (31.1) | 411 | 0.0041 (1) |
| Unmarried | 131 (69.3) | 58 (30.7) | 189 | |
| Type of family | ||||
| Joint | 163 (70.6) | 68 (29.4) | 197 | 0.034 (0.717) |
| Nuclear | 203 (67.4) | 98 (32.6) | 301 | |
| Three generation | 48 (70.6) | 20 (29.4) | 102 | |
| Occupation | ||||
| Working | 231 (59.7) | 156 (40.3) | 387 | 0.2714 (<0.0001)* |
| Nonworking | 183 (85.9) | 30 (14.1) | 213 | |
| Socio economic class | ||||
| I | 259 (70.8) | 107 (29.2) | 366 | 0.1297 (0.0177)* |
| II | 119 (63.0) | 70 (37) | 189 | |
| III | 14 (100.0) | 0 | 14 | |
| IV | 22 (71.0) | 9 (29.0) | 31 | |
| BMI | ||||
| Underweight | 88 (62.4) | 53 (37.6) | 141 | 0.1632 (0.0011)* |
| Normal | 231 (66.8) | 115 (33.2) | 346 | |
| Overweight | 78 (83.0) | 16 (17) | 94 | |
| Obese | 17 (89.5) | 2 (10.5) | 19 | |
| Internet addiction | ||||
| Yes | 345 (67.1) | 169 (32.9) | 514 | 0.0993 (0.0211)* |
| No | 69 (80.2) | 17 (19.8) | 86 | |
| Depression | ||||
| None | 5 (100.0) | 0 | 5 | 0.3533 (<0.0001)* |
| Mild | 156 (69.6) | 68 (30.4) | 224 | |
| Moderate | 128 (54.5) | 107 (45.5) | 235 | |
| Moderately severe | 108 (100.0) | 0 | 108 | |
| Severe | 17 (60.7) | 11 (39.3) | 28 | |
| Spirituality | ||||
| A practical empiricist lacking self-transcendence | 25 (32.89) | 51 (67.10) | 76 | 0.3184 (<0.0001)* |
| Highly skeptical, resistant to developing spiritual awareness | 12 (52.17) | 11 (47.82) | 23 | |
| Highly spiritual, a real mystic | 74 (81.31) | 17 (18.68) | 91 | |
| Spiritually average, could develop more spiritual life if desired | 181 (75.10) | 60 (24.89) | 241 | |
| Spiritually aware, easily lost in the moment | 122 (72.18) | 47 (27.81) | 169 | |
*Significant result. Figures in the parenthesis are row-wise percentages. PSQI: Pittsburgh sleep quality index, BMI: Body mass index
Discriminant function analysis for the sleep quality determination
| Discriminant Function Coeffecient | Explanatory Variables |
| Score | Accuracy (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −0.0440 | Age | 0.758 | −0.617 | 94.7 |
| +2.2260 | Gender* | 0.000 | ||
| −0.2600 | Education | 0.595 | ||
| +0.8380 | Marital status | 0.948 | ||
| −0.2290 | Type of family | 0.456 | ||
| −2.2850 | Occupation* | 0.000 | ||
| +0.0940 | BMI* | 0.000 | ||
| +0.0050 | Internet addiction* | 0.017 | ||
| +0.0050 | Depression* | 0.002 | ||
| +0.2010 | Spiritual* | 0.000 | ||
| +0.0000 | Per capita income | 0.221 | ||
| +1.3600 | Number of children* | 0.000 | ||
| −3.2250 | Constant |
*Significant explanatory variables