Literature DB >> 34759043

Treatment-free Survival after Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy versus Targeted Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: 42-Month Results of the CheckMate 214 Trial.

Meredith M Regan1,2, Opeyemi A Jegede3, Charlene M Mantia2,4, Thomas Powles5, Lillian Werner3, Robert J Motzer6, Nizar M Tannir7, Chung-Han Lee6, Yoshihiko Tomita8, Martin H Voss6, Elizabeth R Plimack9, Toni K Choueiri2,4, Brian I Rini10, Hans J Hammers11, Bernard Escudier12, Laurence Albiges12, Stephen Huo13, Viviana Del Tejo14, Brian Stwalley13, Michael B Atkins15, David F McDermott2,16.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients discontinuing immuno-oncology regimens may experience periods of disease control without need for ongoing anticancer therapy, but toxicity may persist. We describe treatment-free survival (TFS), with and without toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were analyzed from the randomized phase III CheckMate 214 trial of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 550) versus sunitinib (n = 546) for treatment-naïve, advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). TFS was estimated by the 42-month restricted mean times defined by the area between Kaplan-Meier curves for two time-to-event endpoints defined from randomization: time to protocol therapy cessation and time to subsequent systemic therapy initiation or death. TFS was subdivided as TFS with and without toxicity by counting days with ≥1 grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE).
RESULTS: At 42 months since randomization, 52% of nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 39% of sunitinib intermediate/poor-risk patients were alive; 18% and 5% surviving treatment-free, respectively. Among favorable-risk patients, 70% and 73% of nivolumab plus ipilimumab and sunitinib patients were alive; 20% and 9% treatment-free. Over the 42-month period, mean TFS was over twice as long after nivolumab plus ipilimumab than sunitinib for intermediate/poor-risk (6.9 vs. 3.1 months) and three times as long for favorable-risk patients (11.0 vs. 3.7 months). Mean TFS with grade ≥3 TRAEs was a small proportion of time for both treatments (0.6 vs. 0.3 months after nivolumab plus ipilimumab vs. sunitinib for intermediate/poor-risk, and 0.9 vs. 0.3 months for favorable-risk patients).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients initiating first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab for aRCC spent more survival time treatment-free without toxicity versus those on sunitinib, regardless of risk group. ©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34759043      PMCID: PMC9357269          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   13.801


  26 in total

1.  Patient-reported outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib (CheckMate 214): a randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  David Cella; Viktor Grünwald; Bernard Escudier; Hans J Hammers; Saby George; Paul Nathan; Marc-Oliver Grimm; Brian I Rini; Justin Doan; Cristina Ivanescu; Jean Paty; Sabeen Mekan; Robert J Motzer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Patients rank toxicity against progression free survival in second-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael K Wong; Ateesha F Mohamed; A Brett Hauber; Jui-Chen Yang; Zhimei Liu; Jaqueline Rogerio; Carlos A Garay
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.448

3.  Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab versus ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma: 2-year overall survival outcomes in a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  F Stephen Hodi; Jason Chesney; Anna C Pavlick; Caroline Robert; Kenneth F Grossmann; David F McDermott; Gerald P Linette; Nicolas Meyer; Jeffrey K Giguere; Sanjiv S Agarwala; Montaser Shaheen; Marc S Ernstoff; David R Minor; April K Salama; Matthew H Taylor; Patrick A Ott; Christine Horak; Paul Gagnier; Joel Jiang; Jedd D Wolchok; Michael A Postow
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 4.  Alternate sunitinib schedules in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  S Kalra; B I Rini; E Jonasch
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Brian I Rini; Elizabeth R Plimack; Viktor Stus; Rustem Gafanov; Robert Hawkins; Dmitry Nosov; Frédéric Pouliot; Boris Alekseev; Denis Soulières; Bohuslav Melichar; Ihor Vynnychenko; Anna Kryzhanivska; Igor Bondarenko; Sergio J Azevedo; Delphine Borchiellini; Cezary Szczylik; Maurice Markus; Raymond S McDermott; Jens Bedke; Sophie Tartas; Yen-Hwa Chang; Satoshi Tamada; Qiong Shou; Rodolfo F Perini; Mei Chen; Michael B Atkins; Thomas Powles
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Clinical and economic outcomes of treatment sequences for intermediate- to poor-risk advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Apoorva Ambavane; Shuo Yang; Michael B Atkins; Sumati Rao; Anshul Shah; Meredith M Regan; David F McDermott; M Dror Michaelson
Journal:  Immunotherapy       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.196

7.  Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study.

Authors:  Daniel Y C Heng; Wanling Xie; Meredith M Regan; Mark A Warren; Ali Reza Golshayan; Chakshu Sahi; Bernhard J Eigl; J Dean Ruether; Tina Cheng; Scott North; Peter Venner; Jennifer J Knox; Kim N Chi; Christian Kollmannsberger; David F McDermott; William K Oh; Michael B Atkins; Ronald M Bukowski; Brian I Rini; Toni K Choueiri
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  The society for immunotherapy of cancer consensus statement on immunotherapy for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Authors:  Brian I Rini; Dena Battle; Robert A Figlin; Daniel J George; Hans Hammers; Tom Hutson; Eric Jonasch; Richard W Joseph; David F McDermott; Robert J Motzer; Sumanta K Pal; Allan J Pantuck; David I Quinn; Virginia Seery; Martin H Voss; Christopher G Wood; Laura S Wood; Michael B Atkins
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 13.751

9.  A prospective evaluation of VEGF-targeted treatment cessation in metastatic clear cell renal cancer.

Authors:  T Powles; I Kayani; K Sharpe; L Lim; J Peters; G D Stewart; D Berney; A Sahdev; S Chowdhury; E Boleti; J Shamash; A R Reynolds; R Jones; C Blank; J Haanen; A Bex
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Treatment-Free Survival: A Novel Outcome Measure of the Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition-A Pooled Analysis of Patients With Advanced Melanoma.

Authors:  Meredith M Regan; Lillian Werner; Sumati Rao; Komal Gupte-Singh; F Stephen Hodi; John M Kirkwood; Harriet M Kluger; James Larkin; Michael A Postow; Corey Ritchings; Mario Sznol; Ahmad A Tarhini; Jedd D Wolchok; Michael B Atkins; David F McDermott
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  9 in total

1.  Entering the endgame for advanced RCC?

Authors:  Louise Stone
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Phase II Study of Nivolumab and Salvage Nivolumab/Ipilimumab in Treatment-Naive Patients With Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (HCRN GU16-260-Cohort A).

Authors:  Michael B Atkins; Opeyemi A Jegede; Naomi B Haas; David F McDermott; Mehmet A Bilen; Mark Stein; Jeffrey A Sosman; Robert Alter; Elizabeth R Plimack; Moshe Ornstein; Michael Hurwitz; David J Peace; Sabina Signoretti; Thomas Denize; Alessia Cimadamore; Catherine J Wu; David Braun; David Einstein; Paul J Catalano; Hans Hammers
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 50.717

Review 3.  First-Line Treatments for Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Ever-Enlarging Landscape.

Authors:  Shuchi Gulati; Chris Labaki; Georgia Sofia Karachaliou; Toni K Choueiri; Tian Zhang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 4.  From Bench to Bedside: How the Tumor Microenvironment Is Impacting the Future of Immunotherapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan Anker; Justin Miller; Nicole Taylor; Natasha Kyprianou; Che-Kai Tsao
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 5.  Evolving landscape of first-line combination therapy in advanced renal cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aly-Khan A Lalani; Daniel Y C Heng; Naveen S Basappa; Lori Wood; Nayyer Iqbal; Deanna McLeod; Denis Soulières; Christian Kollmannsberger
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.485

6.  Evaluating the Optimal Duration of Immunotherapy in Kidney Cancer.

Authors:  Mamta Parikh; Primo N Lara
Journal:  Kidney Cancer       Date:  2022-08-04

Review 7.  Next Wave of Targets in the Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Luisa M Cardenas; Jasna E Deluce; Shahrukh Khan; Omar Gulam; Saman Maleki Vareki; Ricardo Fernandes; Aly-Khan A Lalani
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 8.  Determining Front-Line Therapeutic Strategy for Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Kevin K Zarrabi; Oladimeji Lanade; Daniel M Geynisman
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 6.575

9.  Maximizing the value of phase III trials in immuno-oncology: A checklist from the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC).

Authors:  Michael B Atkins; Hamzah Abu-Sbeih; Paolo A Ascierto; Michael R Bishop; Daniel S Chen; Madhav Dhodapkar; Leisha A Emens; Marc S Ernstoff; Robert L Ferris; Tim F Greten; James L Gulley; Roy S Herbst; Rachel W Humphrey; James Larkin; Kim A Margolin; Luca Mazzarella; Suresh S Ramalingam; Meredith M Regan; Brian I Rini; Mario Sznol
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 12.469

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.