Literature DB >> 3475886

Gastric bypass versus gastroplasty. A prospective study of differences in two surgical procedures for morbid obesity.

I Näslund.   

Abstract

57 morbidly obese patients were randomized and operated upon with gastric bypass (GBY) or gastroplasty (GPL). The patients were followed for three years. GBY had a slightly higher early complication rate but a significantly (p less than 0.001) greater weight loss. GBY lost 42.3 +/- 10.9 kg after one year and 38.4 +/- 12.3 kg after three years compared to 29.9 +/- 10.0 kg one year and 24.7 +/- 13.1 kg three years after GPL. No GBY but 10 GPL patients were reoperated upon due to failure to lose or to maintain lost weight. An endoscopic method was developed for postoperative measurement of stoma diameter. Use of this method showed no significant difference in stoma diameter between GBY and GPL. A correlation between weight loss and stoma diameter was found one year after GPL but not after GBY. Also a correlation between peroperative pouch volume and weight loss was seen after GPL but not after GBY. The two methods differed in emptying rate of a semi-solid test meal from the upper gastric pouch. For both methods the energy intake was highly reduced postoperatively, but significantly more after GBY. For a number of nutrients the intake was below minimum recommended levels. Fat cell weight was reduced postoperatively, most pronounced for the abdominal regions and least for the femoral-gluteal regions. The reduction was also significantly more pronounced after GBY than after GPL. Calculated fat cell number was significantly reduced after both methods. It is concluded that the effect on body weight of GPL and GBY cannot be explained by the same mode of action. In GPL mechanical fractures such as pouch volume and stoma size are of great importance, which is in accordance with earlier theories. In contrast to this, the results of GBY cannot be satisfactorily explained by such mechanical factors and additional mechanisms, probably of neuro-endocrinologic origin, must be sought for.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3475886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Chir Scand Suppl        ISSN: 0301-1860


  14 in total

1.  Prevalence of anemia and related deficiencies 10 years after gastric bypass--a retrospective study.

Authors:  Christos Karefylakis; Ingmar Näslund; David Edholm; Magnus Sundbom; F Anders Karlsson; Eva Rask
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  National trends in utilization and outcomes of bariatric surgery.

Authors:  T L Trus; G D Pope; S R G Finlayson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a clinical review.

Authors:  David A Sass; Parke Chang; Kapil B Chopra
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 4.  Changes in neurohormonal gut peptides following bariatric surgery.

Authors:  C N Ochner; C Gibson; M Shanik; V Goel; A Geliebter
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 5.095

5.  Body composition, dietary intake, and energy expenditure after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Torsten Olbers; Sofia Björkman; Ak Lindroos; Almantas Maleckas; Lars Lönn; Lars Sjöström; Hans Lönroth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Jejunal linoleic acid infusions require GLP-1 receptor signaling to inhibit food intake: implications for the effectiveness of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Megan J Dailey; Alexander A Moghadam; Timothy H Moran
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.310

Review 7.  Surgical intervention as a strategy for treatment of obesity.

Authors:  L Sjöström
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.633

8.  Weight loss after gastric banding is associated with pouch pressure and not pouch emptying rate.

Authors:  Jan Bech Pedersen; Jens Fromholt Larsen; Asbjørn Mohr Drewes; Anne Arveschoug; Jens Peter Kroustrup; Hans Gregersen
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 9.  Pathophysiology of obesity: why surgery remains the most effective treatment.

Authors:  Talat Waseem; Kris M Mogensen; David B Lautz; Malcolm K Robinson
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Beyond BMI: the need for new guidelines governing the use of bariatric and metabolic surgery.

Authors:  David E Cummings; Ricardo V Cohen
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 32.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.