Patrick J Brown1, Adam Ciarleglio2, Steven P Roose1, Carolina Montes Garcia1, Sarah Chung3, Sara Fernandes1, Bret R Rutherford1. 1. Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA. 2. Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, USA. 3. Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To investigate the longitudinal relationship between physical frailty, the clinical representation of accelerated biological aging, and antidepressant medication response in older adults with depressive illness. METHODS: An 8-week randomized placebo-controlled trial (escitalopram or duloxetine) followed by 10 months of open antidepressant medication treatment (augmentation, switch strategies) was conducted in an outpatient research clinic. 121 adults aged 60 years or older with major depressive disorder (MDD) or persistent depressive disorder and a 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) ≥16 were enrolled. Primary measures assessed serially over 12 months include response (50% reduction from baseline HRSD score), remission (HRSD score <10), and frailty (non/intermediate frail [0-2 deficits] vs frail [≥3 deficits]); latent class analysis was used to classify longitudinal frailty trajectories. RESULTS: A 2-class model best fit the data, identifying a consistently low frailty risk (63% of the sample) and consistently high frailty risk (37% of the sample) trajectory. Response and remission rates (ps ≤ .002) for adults in the high-risk frailty class were at least 21 percentage points worse than those in the low-risk class over 12 months. Furthermore, subsequent frailty was associated with previous frailty (ps ≤ .01) but not previous response or remission (ps ≥ .10). CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant medication is poorly effective for MDD occurring in the context of frailty in older adults. Furthermore, even when an antidepressant response is achieved, this response does little to improve their frailty. These data suggest that standard psychiatric assessment of depressed older adults should include frailty measures and that novel therapeutic strategies to address comorbid frailty and depression are needed.
BACKGROUND: To investigate the longitudinal relationship between physical frailty, the clinical representation of accelerated biological aging, and antidepressant medication response in older adults with depressive illness. METHODS: An 8-week randomized placebo-controlled trial (escitalopram or duloxetine) followed by 10 months of open antidepressant medication treatment (augmentation, switch strategies) was conducted in an outpatient research clinic. 121 adults aged 60 years or older with major depressive disorder (MDD) or persistent depressive disorder and a 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) ≥16 were enrolled. Primary measures assessed serially over 12 months include response (50% reduction from baseline HRSD score), remission (HRSD score <10), and frailty (non/intermediate frail [0-2 deficits] vs frail [≥3 deficits]); latent class analysis was used to classify longitudinal frailty trajectories. RESULTS: A 2-class model best fit the data, identifying a consistently low frailty risk (63% of the sample) and consistently high frailty risk (37% of the sample) trajectory. Response and remission rates (ps ≤ .002) for adults in the high-risk frailty class were at least 21 percentage points worse than those in the low-risk class over 12 months. Furthermore, subsequent frailty was associated with previous frailty (ps ≤ .01) but not previous response or remission (ps ≥ .10). CONCLUSIONS: Antidepressant medication is poorly effective for MDD occurring in the context of frailty in older adults. Furthermore, even when an antidepressant response is achieved, this response does little to improve their frailty. These data suggest that standard psychiatric assessment of depressed older adults should include frailty measures and that novel therapeutic strategies to address comorbid frailty and depression are needed.
Authors: N D Volkow; R C Gur; G J Wang; J S Fowler; P J Moberg; Y S Ding; R Hitzemann; G Smith; J Logan Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Martin Picard; Meagan J McManus; Jason D Gray; Carla Nasca; Cynthia Moffat; Piotr K Kopinski; Erin L Seifert; Bruce S McEwen; Douglas C Wallace Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Patrick J Brown; Steven P Roose; Kaleigh R O'Boyle; Adam Ciarleglio; Benjamin Maas; Kay C Igwe; Sarah Chung; Stephanie Gomez; Maleeha Naqvi; Adam M Brickman; Bret R Rutherford Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2019-10-14 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: A Karabatsiakis; C Böck; J Salinas-Manrique; S Kolassa; E Calzia; D E Dietrich; I-T Kolassa Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2014-06-10 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Jasmin Wertz; Avshalom Caspi; Antony Ambler; Jonathan Broadbent; Robert J Hancox; HonaLee Harrington; Sean Hogan; Renate M Houts; Joan H Leung; Richie Poulton; Suzanne C Purdy; Sandhya Ramrakha; Line Jee Hartmann Rasmussen; Leah S Richmond-Rakerd; Peter R Thorne; Graham A Wilson; Terrie E Moffitt Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 21.596
Authors: Maxwell L Elliott; Avshalom Caspi; Renate M Houts; Antony Ambler; Jonathan M Broadbent; Robert J Hancox; HonaLee Harrington; Sean Hogan; Ross Keenan; Annchen Knodt; Joan H Leung; Tracy R Melzer; Suzanne C Purdy; Sandhya Ramrakha; Leah S Richmond-Rakerd; Antoinette Righarts; Karen Sugden; W Murray Thomson; Peter R Thorne; Benjamin S Williams; Graham Wilson; Ahmad R Hariri; Richie Poulton; Terrie E Moffitt Journal: Nat Aging Date: 2021-03-15
Authors: Breno S Diniz; Benoit H Mulsant; Charles F Reynolds; Daniel M Blumberger; Jordan F Karp; Meryl A Butters; Ana Paula Mendes-Silva; Erica L Vieira; George Tseng; Eric J Lenze Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2022-06-01