| Literature DB >> 34758064 |
Elissa Furutani1, Shanshan Liu2, Ashley Galvin3, Sarah Steltz2, Maggie M Malsch3, Sara K Loveless4,5, Leann Mount4,5, Jordan H Larson3, Kelan Queenan3, Alison A Bertuch6, Mark D Fleming7, John M Gansner8, Amy E Geddis9, Rabi Hanna10, Sioban B Keel11, Bonnie W Lau12, Jeffrey M Lipton13, Robert Lorsbach4,5, Taizo A Nakano14, Adrianna Vlachos13, Winfred C Wang15, Stella M Davies4,5, Edie Weller2, Kasiani C Myers4,5, Akiko Shimamura1.
Abstract
Shwachman-Diamond syndrome (SDS) is an inherited bone marrow failure syndrome with leukemia predisposition. An understanding of the hematologic complications of SDS with age could guide clinical management, but data are limited for this rare disease. We conducted a cohort study of 153 subjects from 143 families with confirmed biallelic SBDS mutations enrolled on the North American Shwachman Diamond Registry or Bone Marrow Failure Registry. The SBDS c.258 + 2T>C variant was present in all but 1 patient. To evaluate the association between blood counts and age, 2146 blood counts were analyzed for 119 subjects. Absolute neutrophil counts were positively associated with age (P < .0001). Hemoglobin was also positively associated with age up to 18 years (P < .0001), but the association was negative thereafter (P = .0079). Platelet counts and marrow cellularity were negatively associated with age (P < .0001). Marrow cellularity did not correlate with blood counts. Severe marrow failure necessitating transplant developed in 8 subjects at a median age of 1.7 years (range, 0.4-39.5), with 7 of 8 requiring transplant prior to age 8 years. Twenty-six subjects (17%) developed a myeloid malignancy (16 myelodysplasia and 10 acute myeloid leukemia) at a median age of 12.3 years (range, 0.5-45.0) and 28.4 years (range, 14.4-47.3), respectively. A lymphoid malignancy developed in 1 patient at the age of 16.9 years. Hematologic complications were the major cause of mortality (17/20 deaths; 85%). These data inform surveillance of hematologic complications in SDS.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34758064 PMCID: PMC8753194 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005539
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Blood Adv ISSN: 2473-9529
Subject characteristics (N = 153)
| Characteristics | Data |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Median (range), y | 10.4 (0.3-52.8) |
| >18 y | 39 (25.5) |
| ≤18 y | 114 (74.5) |
|
| |
| Male | 92 (60.1) |
| Female | 61 (39.9) |
|
| |
| Severe BMF | 8 (5.2) |
| Malignancy | |
| MDS | 16 (10.5) |
| AML | 10 (6.5) |
| Lymphoma | 1 (0.7) |
| Malignancy | 15 (75) |
| BMF | 2 (10) |
| Asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy | 2 (10) |
| Liver failure | 1 (5) |
Unless otherwise noted, data are n (%).
Figure 1.Severe phenotype of the subject with (A-B) Bone marrow biopsy demonstrating irregular islands of cartilage surrounded by osteoid with increased bone-to-marrow space ratio and a loose fibroblastic network surrounding the bone islands. Original magnification ×40 (A), original magnification ×200 (B); hematoxylin and eosin stain.
Figure 2.Blood counts by age in subjects with SDS. A piecewise regression model (green shaded area) was used to determine the association between blood counts and age, allowing for a potential breakpoint for 2114 blood counts from 119 subjects. The locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) curve is shown in purple. LogANC (A), hemoglobin (B), and log platelet count (C) as a function of age.
Figure 3.Marrow cellularity vs age in subjects with SDS. Scatter plot showing bone marrow cellularity vs age. Bone marrow was taken for 414 marrow examinations in 112 subjects.
Clonal abnormalities over time in patients with SDS
| Patient | Clonal abnormality | Outcome | MDS/AML karyotype |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | iso(7q) | unknown | |
| 2 | iso(7q), then separate add(mar), then separate i(X) | Transient clones | |
| 3 | iso(7q) | Transient clone | |
| 4 | iso(7q) | Persistent clone, then developed MDS | 46,XX,der(3;6)(q25;q13)[20]/45,dic(6;7)(q13;p11.2)[4]/46,XX[1] |
| 5 | iso(7q) | Unknown | |
| 6 | iso(7q) | Persistent clone | |
| 7 | iso(7q), separate del3q clone | Progressed to AML | Cytogenetics not available |
| 8 | iso(7q) | Persistent clone | |
| 9 | iso(X) and add X | Transient clones | |
| 10 | iso(X) | Persistent clone | |
| 11 | del(X) | Transient clone | |
| 12 | del(X) | Intermittent clone | |
| 13 | 46, XX [19]/27, XX, + mar[1] | unknown | |
| 14 | der(1) | Developed MDS | 46,XY+1,der(1;17)(q10;q10)[18] /46,XY[2] |
| 15 | inv(1), then add(7) | inv(1) was transient, add(7) unknown | |
| 16 | add(3q), del(8q) | Developed AML | 46,XX,add(3)(q27),del(8)(q13q22),der (10)t(10;15)(p11.2q15)[1], 43-44,der(2)t(2;12)(q33;q13), add(3)(q27),add(4)(q21),-5,-6,add(6)(q25),-7,del(8)(q13q22),-11,-12,der(18)t(11;19)(q13;p13.3)+2-3mar[6], 46,XX[13] |
| 17 | add(7q) | Transient clone | |
| 18 | add(7p) | unknown | |
| 19 | der(9) | Transient clone | |
| 20 | del20q | Persistent clone | |
| 21 | del20q | Transient clone | |
| 22 | add(Y), add(mar), del(20q) | add(Y) is constitutional, del20q persistent. Then developed MDS | 47,XYYc,del(20)(q11.2q13.2)[15]/47, XYYc |
| 23 | del20q | Persistent clone | |
| 24 | del20q | Persistent clone | |
| 25 | add (7p) then separate del(20q), and separate iso(7q), then aberrant complex karyotype in 1 cell (43,XY-1,+del(3)(p2?1),-5,-6,-7) | Both add(7p) and del(20q) disappeared, then progressed to MDS | 46, XY, del(20)(q11.2q13.1)[10]/46,XY,add(7)(q22)[7]/45, XY-7[3] |
| 26 | del20q | Persistent clone | |
| 27 | del20q | Intermittent clone | |
| 28 | del20q | Persistent clone | |
| 29 | del20q | Persistent clone | |
| 30 | del20q | Persistent clone | |
| 31 | del20q | Persistent clone | |
| 32 | del20q | Unknown | |
| 33 | del20q - developed 2 separate del20q clones (previously also developed iso7q) | Persistent clone, then developed MDS | 46XX,del(20)(q11.2q13.3)[9]/46,XX[11] |
| 34 | del20q | Transient clone | |
| 35 | del20q | Persistent clone | |
| 36 | del20q, separate del1p clone | Persistent clones | |
| 37 | del20q | Add 7p which disappeared, then del20q, then del12p developed and progressed to MDS | 46XY[5]/46, XY, del(12)(p11.1)[5]/35,idem,del(5)(q?22q?31),-7,del(9)(q21)[3]/44, idem, add(1)(p32),add(3)(p24),-5,-7,del(9)(q21)[7]/45, idem, add(1)(p32,add(3)(p24),-5,-7,del(9)(q21),=mar[4] |
| 38 | del20q, then separate iso7q | Unknown | |
| 39 | del20q | Unknown | |
| 40 | del20q | Persistent clone | |
| 41 | del20q | Persistent clone |
Figure 4.Overall survival of subjects with SDS. Kaplan-Meier curve showing overall survival of all subjects. Time is expressed in years since birth.