PURPOSE: There is growing interest in performing fluoroless radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) due to the increasing awareness of risk associated with radiation exposure of patients and professional staff. The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a stepwise transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided zero-fluoroscopy approach (ZFA) for RFA. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 111) referred for AF-ablation were prospectively enrolled with intention to RFA with ZFA. Procedural outcomes were compared with historical controls (HCs) after 1:1 propensity score matching. ZFA success was considered when no X-ray was utilized to perform the whole procedure. RESULTS: ZFA success was achieved in 80 (72%) procedures. BMI > 35 kg/m2 resulted in the only independent predictor of ZFA failure (OR = 6.10, 95% CI 1.15-46.49, p = 0.04). In comparison to HCs, a significant reduction in radiation exposure was observed in the ZFA group: fluoroscopy time (3 vs. 63 s, p < 0.001), total emitted fluoroscopy dose (0.2 vs. 6.0 mGy, p < 0.001), dose area product (0.04 vs. 1.4 Gy*cm2, p < 0.001), and effective dose (0.8 vs. 27.2 mSv*100, p < 0.001). Complete pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all procedures. No difference was observed between the groups in in-hospital complication rate (0.9% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study proving procedural feasibility, safety, and efficacy of TEE-guided AF-ablation with a complete or near-complete avoidance of radiological exposure, without using intracardiac echocardiography.
PURPOSE: There is growing interest in performing fluoroless radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) due to the increasing awareness of risk associated with radiation exposure of patients and professional staff. The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a stepwise transesophageal echocardiography (TEE)-guided zero-fluoroscopy approach (ZFA) for RFA. METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 111) referred for AF-ablation were prospectively enrolled with intention to RFA with ZFA. Procedural outcomes were compared with historical controls (HCs) after 1:1 propensity score matching. ZFA success was considered when no X-ray was utilized to perform the whole procedure. RESULTS: ZFA success was achieved in 80 (72%) procedures. BMI > 35 kg/m2 resulted in the only independent predictor of ZFA failure (OR = 6.10, 95% CI 1.15-46.49, p = 0.04). In comparison to HCs, a significant reduction in radiation exposure was observed in the ZFA group: fluoroscopy time (3 vs. 63 s, p < 0.001), total emitted fluoroscopy dose (0.2 vs. 6.0 mGy, p < 0.001), dose area product (0.04 vs. 1.4 Gy*cm2, p < 0.001), and effective dose (0.8 vs. 27.2 mSv*100, p < 0.001). Complete pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all procedures. No difference was observed between the groups in in-hospital complication rate (0.9% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study proving procedural feasibility, safety, and efficacy of TEE-guided AF-ablation with a complete or near-complete avoidance of radiological exposure, without using intracardiac echocardiography.
Authors: Cheryl Teres; David Soto-Iglesias; Diego Penela; Giulio Falasconi; Daniel Viveros; Julia Meca-Santamaria; Aldo Bellido; Jose Alderete; Alfredo Chauca; Augusto Ordoñez; Julio Martí-Almor; Claudia Scherer; Alejandro Panaro; Julio Carballo; Óscar Cámara; Jose-Tomás Ortiz-Pérez; Antonio Berruezo Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 1.759
Authors: Cheryl Teres; David Soto-Iglesias; Diego Penela; Beatriz Jáuregui; Augusto Ordoñez; Alfredo Chauca; Jose Miguel Carreño; Claudia Scherer; Marina Huguet; Carlos Ramírez; José Torres Mandujano; Giuliana Maldonado; Alejandro Panaro; Julio Carballo; Óscar Cámara; Jose-Tomás Ortiz-Pérez; Antonio Berruezo Journal: Heart Rhythm O2 Date: 2022-02-13