Literature DB >> 34757386

Incidence and prognosis of COVID-19 amongst heart transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Furqan Ahmed1, Minaam Abid1, Talha Maniya2, Muhammad Shariq Usman3, Marat Fudim4,5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34757386      PMCID: PMC8689985          DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwab175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol        ISSN: 2047-4873            Impact factor:   7.804


× No keyword cloud information.
Several studies have highlighted the cardiovascular effects of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), including an increased risk of arteriovenous thrombosis, myocarditis, and myocardial infarction. In addition, it is well-established that patients with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases have an increased susceptibility to COVID-19, and a worse prognosis. These concerns also extend to heart transplant (HT) recipients, who are often on chronic immunosuppression and have an increased burden of comorbidities., However, the incidence and prognosis of COVID-19 in HT recipients have not been well-characterized, primarily due to studies with small sample sizes. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies in an effort to provide a well-powered comprehensive assessment of the risk and prognosis of COVID-19 in recipients of HT. This study was conducted in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We performed an electronic search of databases PubMed and Scopus from inception to the first week of May 2021 using the following search string: (Heart transplant OR Cardiac transplant) AND (COVID-19 OR SARS-Cov-2 OR coronavirus disease 19). Additionally, we hand-searched reference lists of relevant articles to identify any missed articles. The search and data extraction were conducted independently by two reviewers (M.A. and F.A.). For our analysis, we only included articles with at least 10 HT recipients. The COVID-19 infection rate in the HT cohort in each study was calculated or extracted from the study. For each HT cohort, the COVID-19 infection rate in the region (during the study period) was used as control; this information was retrieved from official government sources or published research articles. In a similar manner, the mortality rate in the HT recipients with COVID-19 was also compared with the general population. The OpenMetaAnalyst software was used for all analyses. Mortality and hospitalizations rates in the HT population were arcsine transformed and pooled using a random-effects model in order to derive summary estimates. To compare infection and mortality rates with the general population, odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and pooled using a random-effects model. The data underlying this article are available in the article and in its online supplementary material. Our initial search yielded 397 studies. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 18 studies were included in the study. References for all included studies are given in Supplementary material online, . The detailed literature search is highlighted in the PRISMA flow chart (Supplementary material online, ). Ten studies reported the COVID-19 infection rate amongst HT patients. Amongst a total of 5588 HT patients, 2.54% contracted COVID-19. The likelihood of COVID-19 infection was significantly higher in the HT population compared with the general population (OR 5.47; 95% CI 3.03–9.89, I2 = 90.6%, P < 0.001; ). Twelve studies reported outcomes in HT recipients who contracted COVID-19 (n = 424 patients). Characteristics of participants in the included studies are shown in , of whom 75% were male, 35% had diabetes mellitus and 65% had hypertension. The pooled mortality rate was 27.6% (95% CI 23.2–32.2%; n = 107/384; ) and the pooled hospitalization rate was 82.9% (95% CI 77.1–87.9%; n = 242/298; ). Compared with the general population, the mortality rate due to COVID-19 was significantly higher in the HT population (OR 3.37; 95% CI 2.25–5.05, I2 = 64.5%, P < 0.001; ).
Figure 1

Forest plots displaying. (A) The odds of COVID-19 infection in heart transplant recipients compared with general population. (B) Mortality rate amongst heart transplant recipients infected with COVID-19. (C) Hospitalization rate amongst heart transplant recipients infected with COVID-19. (D) Mortality rate amongst heart transplant recipients infected with COVID-19 compared to general population infected with COVID-19.

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of heart transplant patients infected with COVID-19

StudyTotal cases of HTMedian age (years)Male, n (%)Median time since transplant (years)Diabetes, n (%)Hyper tension, n (%)CKD, n (%)Mortality, n (%)Hospitali zation, n (%)ICU admission, n (%)Invasive ventilation, n (%)
Bottio et al. (Cohort 1)4761.8437 (79)10.46 ± 8.70a8 (17)30 (64)NA14 (37)38 (81)4 (9)2 (4)
Bottio et al. (Cohort 2)6594 (67)7.8a2 (33)4 (67)NA6 (100)1 (17)0 (0)0 (0)
Coll et al.696454 (79)10.17NANANA13 (22)51 (86)7 (12)3 (6)
Singhvi et al.2258.614 (63.6)4.612 (54.5)21 (95.5)14 (63.6)5 (22.7%)19 (86.4)4 (18.2)4 (21.1)
Trapani et al.5359.8aNA6.1NANANA19 (35.8)NANANA
García-Cosío et al.136310 (76.9)172 (15.4)7 (53.8)6 (46.2)4 (31)11 (84.6)1 (8.3)1 (8.3)
Felldin et al.655a5 (83.3)11.71(16.7)2 (33.3)2 (33.3)1 (16.7)3 (50)NANA
Rivinius et al.2158.617 (81.0)7.83 ± 6.89a7 (33.3)15 (71.4)6 (28.6)7 (33.3)19 (90.5)17 (71.4)8 (38.1)
Ketcham et al.1361a13 (100)89 (69)11 (85)11 (85)2(15)13 (100)13 (46)5/13 (38)
Latif et al.286422 (79)8.617 (61)20 (71)10 (36)7 (25)22 (79)7 (25)7 (25)
Sharma et al.10NANANANANANA3 (33.3)NANANA
Hoek et al.4513 (100)10NANANA0 (0)NANANA
Fiocco et al.6NANANANANANA2 (33.3)NANANA
Ahluwalia et al.5504 (80)215 (100)5 (100)5 (100)1 (20)3 (60)NANA
Marcondes- Braga et al.405324 (60)2.810 (25)14 (35)15 (37.5)11 (27.5)33 (82.5)17 (42.5)9 (22.5)
Granger et al.3954.426 (66.7)4.916 (40)28 (71.8)21 (53.8)10 (25.6)35 (89.7)14 (35.9)8 (20.5)
Simonenko et al.12NANANANANANANANANANA
Ravanan et al.23NANANANANANA6 (26.1)NANANA
Carey et al.8NANANANANANANANANANA

CKD, chronic kidney disease; HT, heart transplant; NA, not available.

Mean.

Forest plots displaying. (A) The odds of COVID-19 infection in heart transplant recipients compared with general population. (B) Mortality rate amongst heart transplant recipients infected with COVID-19. (C) Hospitalization rate amongst heart transplant recipients infected with COVID-19. (D) Mortality rate amongst heart transplant recipients infected with COVID-19 compared to general population infected with COVID-19. Baseline characteristics of heart transplant patients infected with COVID-19 CKD, chronic kidney disease; HT, heart transplant; NA, not available. Mean. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis studying the risk and prognosis of COVID-19 amongst HT patients. Our findings show that the odds of being diagnosed with COVID-19 are more than five times higher in HT recipients. Our findings also show that the chances of hospitalization in HT recipients with COVID-19 are approximately 80%; and the mortality rate approaches 30%. The most likely contributor to susceptibility and poor prognosis of COVID-19 in HT recipients is the use of immunosuppressants, which increase the likelihood of symptomatic disease and unchecked progression. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, it was hypothesized that immunosuppressed patients may be less likely to contract a severe form of COVID-19, due to a lower risk of immune-mediated cytokine storms., Recent, more comprehensive, data refute this and suggest a poorer prognosis in COVID-19 patients who have been on immunosuppressive therapy. Findings from our study corroborate these recent data. Studies assessing mortality in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 have confirmed the same. Another major contributor to a poor COVID-19 prognosis is the high burden of comorbidities in HT patients, as seen in our study population. The direct effects of COVID-19 on the cardiovascular system may also play a role in the poorer prognosis. Certain limitations must be kept in mind when interpreting the results of this study. There is possibility of confounding bias given that this is a meta-analysis of case series and observational studies. Differences in COVID-19 infection rate, management protocols, differences in heart transplantation protocols and immunosuppressive treatments between countries may limit the interpretation of our findings. Predictors of increased susceptibility and poor prognosis of COVID-19 in HT recipients may be better delineated by large scale cohort studies running multivariate adjusted analyses; however, such studies are unlikely to emerge soon given that relatively small number of HT cases. The current analysis provides evidence supporting the use of increased protective measures and close monitoring of HT recipients during the pandemic.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at European Journal of Preventive Cardiology online. Conflict of interest: none declared. Click here for additional data file.
  3 in total

Review 1.  Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine among Heart Transplant Recipients: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Saeed Shoar; Adriana C Carolina Prada-Ruiz; Gabriel Patarroyo-Aponte; Ashok Chaudhary; Mohammad Sadegh Asadi
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med       Date:  2022-06-05

2.  Risk Factors for Weak Antibody Response of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Adult Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kezhen Zong; Dadi Peng; Hang Yang; Zuotian Huang; Yunhai Luo; Yihua Wang; Song Xiang; Tingting Li; Tong Mou; Zhongjun Wu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  COVID-19 in heart transplant patients: is there a cause for concern?

Authors:  Huzaifa Ahmad Cheema; Abia Shahid
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 8.526

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.