Rachel Thompson1, Jayson Haws2, Nelson L Rhodus2, Frank G Ondrey3. 1. Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. Electronic address: thom4795@umn.edu. 2. Department of Diagnostic and Biological Sciences, University of Minnesota, 515 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. 3. Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Oral cancers lack standardized monitoring systems. Our institution has developed an active surveillance system which provides detailed monitoring and follow up of patients with oral preneoplastic lesions (OPL). We examined a historic cohort of patients with OPL seen by regional dental professionals and a current cohort of clinic patients. The major aim was to examine follow up practices for biopsy proven dysplasia to gauge appropriateness of an active monitoring system for oral carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires regarding patients with OPL were sent to 285 dentists who had requested oral pathology services from our institution. The follow up practices of 141 dentists were evaluated for patients with OPL. We then examined our current clinic referral patterns for the number of dental referrals after the creation of an oral carcinoma active surveillance clinic. RESULTS: There were 76.5% (108/141) of patients who received follow up after diagnosis of preneoplastic oral lesions with 14.1% who underwent repeat biopsy. There was a malignant transformation rate of 11.3% including transformation of 42.8% of severe dysplasias into carcinoma within 2 years. After establishment of a dental referral clinic, 21.8% of tumor visits in a six-week period were referred from the regional dental community. CONCLUSIONS: A high rate of transformation of OPL to cancer in this cohort may support a role for joint dental and otolaryngology surveillance of dysplasia with longitudinal follow up.
PURPOSE: Oral cancers lack standardized monitoring systems. Our institution has developed an active surveillance system which provides detailed monitoring and follow up of patients with oral preneoplastic lesions (OPL). We examined a historic cohort of patients with OPL seen by regional dental professionals and a current cohort of clinic patients. The major aim was to examine follow up practices for biopsy proven dysplasia to gauge appropriateness of an active monitoring system for oral carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Questionnaires regarding patients with OPL were sent to 285 dentists who had requested oral pathology services from our institution. The follow up practices of 141 dentists were evaluated for patients with OPL. We then examined our current clinic referral patterns for the number of dental referrals after the creation of an oral carcinoma active surveillance clinic. RESULTS: There were 76.5% (108/141) of patients who received follow up after diagnosis of preneoplastic oral lesions with 14.1% who underwent repeat biopsy. There was a malignant transformation rate of 11.3% including transformation of 42.8% of severe dysplasias into carcinoma within 2 years. After establishment of a dental referral clinic, 21.8% of tumor visits in a six-week period were referred from the regional dental community. CONCLUSIONS: A high rate of transformation of OPL to cancer in this cohort may support a role for joint dental and otolaryngology surveillance of dysplasia with longitudinal follow up.
Authors: Daniella Karassawa Zanoni; Pablo H Montero; Jocelyn C Migliacci; Jatin P Shah; Richard J Wong; Ian Ganly; Snehal G Patel Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: J J Lee; W K Hong; W N Hittelman; L Mao; R Lotan; D M Shin; S E Benner; X C Xu; J S Lee; V M Papadimitrakopoulou; C Geyer; C Perez; J W Martin; A K El-Naggar; S M Lippman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-05 Impact factor: 12.531