Literature DB >> 34757075

Enhancing carrier flux for efficient drug delivery in cancer tissues.

Andrés Arango-Restrepo1, J Miguel Rubi2, Signe Kjelstrup3, Bjørn Atle J Angelsen3, Catharina de Lange Davies3.   

Abstract

Ultrasound focused toward tumors in the presence of circulating microbubbles improves the delivery of drug-loaded nanoparticles and therapeutic outcomes; however, the efficacy varies among the different properties and conditions of the tumors. Therefore, there is a need to optimize the ultrasound parameters and determine the properties of the tumor tissue important for the successful delivery of nanoparticles. Here, we propose a mesoscopic model considering the presence of entropic forces to explain the ultrasound-enhanced transport of nanoparticles across the capillary wall and through the interstitium of tumors. The nanoparticles move through channels of variable shape whose irregularities can be assimilated to barriers of entropic nature that the nanoparticles must overcome to reach their targets. The model assumes that focused ultrasound and circulating microbubbles cause the capillary wall to oscillate, thereby changing the width of transcapillary and interstitial channels. Our analysis provides values for the penetration distances of nanoparticles into the interstitium that are in agreement with experimental results. We found that the penetration increased significantly with increasing acoustic intensity as well as tissue elasticity, which means softer and more deformable tissue (Young modulus lower than 50 kPa), whereas porosity of the tissue and pulse repetition frequency of the ultrasound had less impact on the penetration length. We also considered that nanoparticles can be absorbed into cells and to extracellular matrix constituents, finding that the penetration length is increased when there is a low absorbance coefficient of the nanoparticles compared with their diffusion coefficient (close to 0.2). The model can be used to predict which tumor types, in terms of elasticity, will successfully deliver nanoparticles into the interstitium. It can also be used to predict the penetration distance into the interstitium of nanoparticles with various sizes and the ultrasound intensity needed for the efficient distribution of the nanoparticles.
Copyright © 2021 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34757075      PMCID: PMC8715163          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.10.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  57 in total

1.  Available space and extracellular transport of macromolecules: effects of pore size and connectedness.

Authors:  F Yuan; A Krol; S Tong
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound.

Authors:  R E Apfel; C K Holland
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Direct observations of ultrasound microbubble contrast agent interaction with the microvessel wall.

Authors:  Charles F Caskey; Susanne M Stieger; Shengping Qin; Paul A Dayton; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Diffusion in linear porous media with periodic entropy barriers: A tube formed by contacting spheres.

Authors:  Marco-Vinicio Vazquez; Alexander M Berezhkovskii; Leonardo Dagdug
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Characteristic microvessel relaxation timescales associated with ultrasound-activated microbubbles.

Authors:  Hong Chen; Andrew A Brayman; Thomas J Matula
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 6.  Toward a full understanding of the EPR effect in primary and metastatic tumors as well as issues related to its heterogeneity.

Authors:  Hiroshi Maeda
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 15.470

7.  Investigations into pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound-enhanced delivery: preliminary evidence for a novel mechanism.

Authors:  Hilary A Hancock; Lauren H Smith; Julian Cuesta; Amir K Durrani; Mary Angstadt; Mark L Palmeri; Eitan Kimmel; Victor Frenkel
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 8.  Ultrasound mediated delivery of drugs and genes to solid tumors.

Authors:  Victor Frenkel
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 9.  Reengineering the Physical Microenvironment of Tumors to Improve Drug Delivery and Efficacy: From Mathematical Modeling to Bench to Bedside.

Authors:  Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos; Lance L Munn; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2018-03-13

10.  Therapeutic Ultrasound Parameter Optimization for Drug Delivery Applied to a Murine Model of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Arsenii V Telichko; Huaijun Wang; Sunitha Bachawal; Sukumar U Kumar; Jagathesh C Bose; Ramasamy Paulmurugan; Jeremy J Dahl
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.