| Literature DB >> 34755487 |
Timothy M Moore1, Anthony Terrazas1, Alexander R Strumwasser2, Amanda J Lin2, Xiaopeng Zhu3, Akshay T S Anand2, Christina Q Nguyen2, Linsey Stiles2, Frode Norheim4, Jennifer M Lang4, Simon T Hui1, Lorraine P Turcotte5, Zhenqi Zhou2.
Abstract
The metabolic syndrome is a cluster of conditions that increase an individual's risk of developing diseases. Being physically active throughout life is known to reduce the prevalence and onset of some aspects of the metabolic syndrome. Furthermore, previous studies have demonstrated that an individual's gut microbiome composition has a large influence on several aspects of the metabolic syndrome. However, the mechanism(s) by which physical activity may improve metabolic health are not well understood. We sought to determine if endurance exercise is sufficient to prevent or ameliorate the development of the metabolic syndrome and its associated diseases. We also analyzed the impact of physical activity under metabolic syndrome progression upon the gut microbiome composition. Utilizing whole-body low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) knockout mice on a "Western Diet," we show that long-term exercise acts favorably upon glucose tolerance, adiposity, and liver lipids. Exercise increased mitochondrial abundance in skeletal muscle but did not reduce liver fibrosis, aortic lesion area, or plasma lipids. Lastly, we observed several changes in gut bacteria and their novel associations with metabolic parameters of clinical importance. Altogether, our results indicate that exercise can ameliorate some aspects of the metabolic syndrome progression and alter the gut microbiome composition.Entities:
Keywords: LDLR; exercise; metabolic syndrome; microbiome; obesity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34755487 PMCID: PMC8578881 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.15068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
FIGURE 1(a) Weekly body weight. (b) Change in body weight from week 0 to week 16. (c) Cumulative running distance per week in km. Red dashed line represents overall cumulative weekly average. (d) Time to exhaustion during exercise test. (e) Change in run to exhaustion expressed as a percent of each animal's week 0 time. (f) Blood glucose levels during the glucose tolerance test at week 14. (g) Area under the curve from glucose tolerance test. (h) Blood glucose levels during insulin tolerance test at week 15. (i) Area under the curve during the insulin tolerance test at week 15. (j) Aorta lesion area. (K) Wet weight of each tissue at the time of sacrifice. (l) Fgf21 levels in plasma at the time of sacrifice. (m) Plasma metabolite concentration at the time of sacrifice. Groups represented as mean ± SEM. N = 7–10/group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001
FIGURE 2(a) Liver H&E (left two columns) and Masson's Trichrome (right two columns) images. (b, c) Histology and fibrosis score from panel A. (d, e) Lipid or glycogen concentrations within liver. (f) Gene expression within liver normalized to the housekeeping gene 18S and expressed relative to SED avg. Groups represented as mean ± SEM. N = 10/group. *p < 0.05
FIGURE 3(a) Mitochondrial DNA to nuclear DNA ratio within liver expressed relative to SED average. (b) Citrate synthase activity from frozen liver expressed as nanomoles/minute/microgram of liver. (c) Oxygen consumption rate from frozen liver expressed as picomoles of oxygen/minute/microgram of protein. (d, e) Immunoblot with resulting densitometry within liver normalized to the housekeeping protein GAPDH and expressed relative to SED group average. Groups represented as mean ± SEM. N = 5–10/group
FIGURE 4(a) Gene expression within quadriceps muscle normalized to the housekeeping gene 18S and expressed relative to SED average. (b) Mitochondrial DNA to nuclear DNA ratio within quadriceps muscle expressed relative to SED average. (c) Oxygen consumption rate from frozen quadriceps muscle expressed as picomoles of oxygen/minute/microgram of protein. (d) Citrate synthase activity from frozen quadriceps muscle expressed as nanomoles/minute/microgram of muscle. (e) Lipid concentrations within quadriceps muscle. (f, g) Immunoblot with resulting densitometry within quadriceps muscle normalized to the housekeeping protein GAPDH and expressed relative to SED group average (Showing N = 2/group). Groups represented as mean ±SEM. N = 5–10/group. *p < 0.05
FIGURE 5(a) Lipid concentrations within iWAT. (b) Mitochondrial DNA to nuclear DNA ratio within iWAT expressed relative to SED average. (c) Gene expression within iWAT normalized to the housekeeping gene Ppia and expressed relative to SED average. (d, e) Immunoblot with resulting densitometry within iWAT normalized to the housekeeping protein Hsp90 and expressed relative to SED group average (Showing N = 2/group). Groups represented as mean ± SEM. N = 5–10/group. *p < 0.05
FIGURE 6(a) Volcano plot of OTUs identified within the cecum. Significant OTUs are colored blue. (b) Phylum level summary of OTUs. (c) Unbiased principal component analysis. (d) Select measures of alpha diversity relative to SED group average. Groups represented as mean ± SEM. N = 10/group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
FIGURE 7Correlation matrix. Only factors with one or more significant associations are shown (p < 0.01). Red = negative association and blue = positive association