| Literature DB >> 34753893 |
Margot Fodor1, Heinz Zoller2, Rupert Oberhuber1, Robert Sucher3, Daniel Seehofer3, Umberto Cillo4, Pal Dag Line5,6, Herbert Tilg2, Stefan Schneeberger1.
Abstract
Liver transplantation (LT) survival rates have continued to improve over the last decades, mostly due to the reduction of mortality early after transplantation. The advancement is facilitating a liberalization of access to LT, with more patients with higher risk profiles being added to the waiting list. At the same time, the persisting organ shortage fosters strategies to rescue organs of high-risk donors. This is facilitated by novel technologies such as machine perfusion. Owing to these developments, reconsideration of the current and emerging endpoints for the assessment of the efficacy of existing and new therapies is warranted. While conventional early endpoints in LT have focused on the damage induced to the parenchyma, the fate of the bile duct and the recurrence of the underlying disease have a stronger impact on the long-term outcome. In light of this evolving landscape, we here attempt to reflect on the appropriateness of the currently used endpoints in the field of LT trials.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34753893 DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003973
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transplantation ISSN: 0041-1337 Impact factor: 5.385