Junxiu Liu1, Euridice Martinez Steele2, Yan Li3, Dimitra Karageorgou4, Renata Micha4, Carlos A Monteiro2, Dariush Mozaffarian4. 1. Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: junxiu.liu@mountsinai.org. 2. Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Center for Epidemiological Studies in Health and Nutrition, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 3. Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 4. Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Consumption of ultraprocessed foods has been linked with higher intake of added sugars, sodium, and unhealthful fats, but the associations of ultraprocessed foods with overall diet quality and major food groups are not well known. METHODS: Data were derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2015-2018), including 9,758 adults (aged ≥20 years) and 5,280 children (aged 2-19 years) with 24-hour dietary recalls (≥1), with analysis performed in 2020. Ultraprocessed foods were identified using the NOVA classification, with intake (% energy) assessed in quintiles. Diet quality was assessed using the validated American Heart Association 2020 continuous primary and secondary diet scores and Healthy Eating Index 2015. Poor diet was defined as <40% adherence to the American Heart Association secondary score. Generalized linear regressions estimated relationships between ultraprocessed food intake and diet quality. RESULTS: Compared with the lowest quintile of ultraprocessed food consumption (<39.1% energy), the American Heart Association primary score in adults was progressively lower in Quintile 2 (-1.99, 95% CI= -2.73, -1.25), Quintile 3 (-3.60, 95% CI= -4.47, -2.72), Quintile 4 (-5.29, 95% CI= -6.28, -4.30), and Quintile 5 (-7.24, 95% CI= -8.13, -6.36; >70.7% energy). Corresponding values in children were -2.05 (95% CI= -3.01, -1.09), -2.97 (95% CI= -4.16, -1.79), -3.82 (95% CI= -5.20, -2.44), and -6.22 (95% CI= -7.20, -5.25; >79.0% energy). The estimated proportion of children having poor diet progressively increased from 31.3% (95% CI=26.2%, 36.5%) in Quintile 1 up to 71.6% (95% CI=68.1%, 75.1%) in Quintile 5. Corresponding proportions of adults having poor diet increased from 18.1% (95% CI=14.3%, 22.0%) in Quintile 1 up to 59.7% (95% CI=55.3%, 64.1%) in Quintile 5. Findings were similar using the American Heart Association secondary score and Healthy Eating Index 2015 score. CONCLUSIONS: Higher ultraprocessed food consumption is associated with substantially lower diet quality among children and adults.
INTRODUCTION: Consumption of ultraprocessed foods has been linked with higher intake of added sugars, sodium, and unhealthful fats, but the associations of ultraprocessed foods with overall diet quality and major food groups are not well known. METHODS: Data were derived from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2015-2018), including 9,758 adults (aged ≥20 years) and 5,280 children (aged 2-19 years) with 24-hour dietary recalls (≥1), with analysis performed in 2020. Ultraprocessed foods were identified using the NOVA classification, with intake (% energy) assessed in quintiles. Diet quality was assessed using the validated American Heart Association 2020 continuous primary and secondary diet scores and Healthy Eating Index 2015. Poor diet was defined as <40% adherence to the American Heart Association secondary score. Generalized linear regressions estimated relationships between ultraprocessed food intake and diet quality. RESULTS: Compared with the lowest quintile of ultraprocessed food consumption (<39.1% energy), the American Heart Association primary score in adults was progressively lower in Quintile 2 (-1.99, 95% CI= -2.73, -1.25), Quintile 3 (-3.60, 95% CI= -4.47, -2.72), Quintile 4 (-5.29, 95% CI= -6.28, -4.30), and Quintile 5 (-7.24, 95% CI= -8.13, -6.36; >70.7% energy). Corresponding values in children were -2.05 (95% CI= -3.01, -1.09), -2.97 (95% CI= -4.16, -1.79), -3.82 (95% CI= -5.20, -2.44), and -6.22 (95% CI= -7.20, -5.25; >79.0% energy). The estimated proportion of children having poor diet progressively increased from 31.3% (95% CI=26.2%, 36.5%) in Quintile 1 up to 71.6% (95% CI=68.1%, 75.1%) in Quintile 5. Corresponding proportions of adults having poor diet increased from 18.1% (95% CI=14.3%, 22.0%) in Quintile 1 up to 59.7% (95% CI=55.3%, 64.1%) in Quintile 5. Findings were similar using the American Heart Association secondary score and Healthy Eating Index 2015 score. CONCLUSIONS: Higher ultraprocessed food consumption is associated with substantially lower diet quality among children and adults.
Authors: Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Yuling Hong; Darwin Labarthe; Dariush Mozaffarian; Lawrence J Appel; Linda Van Horn; Kurt Greenlund; Stephen Daniels; Graham Nichol; Gordon F Tomaselli; Donna K Arnett; Gregg C Fonarow; P Michael Ho; Michael S Lauer; Frederick A Masoudi; Rose Marie Robertson; Véronique Roger; Lee H Schwamm; Paul Sorlie; Clyde W Yancy; Wayne D Rosamond Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Carlos A Monteiro; Geoffrey Cannon; Renata B Levy; Jean-Claude Moubarac; Maria Lc Louzada; Fernanda Rauber; Neha Khandpur; Gustavo Cediel; Daniela Neri; Euridice Martinez-Steele; Larissa G Baraldi; Patricia C Jaime Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Renata Micha; Jose L Peñalvo; Frederick Cudhea; Fumiaki Imamura; Colin D Rehm; Dariush Mozaffarian Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Eurídice Martínez Steele; Larissa Galastri Baraldi; Maria Laura da Costa Louzada; Jean-Claude Moubarac; Dariush Mozaffarian; Carlos Augusto Monteiro Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-03-09 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Bernard Srour; Léopold K Fezeu; Emmanuelle Kesse-Guyot; Benjamin Allès; Caroline Méjean; Roland M Andrianasolo; Eloi Chazelas; Mélanie Deschasaux; Serge Hercberg; Pilar Galan; Carlos A Monteiro; Chantal Julia; Mathilde Touvier Journal: BMJ Date: 2019-05-29
Authors: Anaïs Rico-Campà; Miguel A Martínez-González; Ismael Alvarez-Alvarez; Raquel de Deus Mendonça; Carmen de la Fuente-Arrillaga; Clara Gómez-Donoso; Maira Bes-Rastrollo Journal: BMJ Date: 2019-05-29