Literature DB >> 3475324

Clinical application of topical fluoride products--risks, benefits, and recommendations.

E J Lecompte.   

Abstract

This portion of the symposium discusses the various methods of professionally applying high-concentration topical fluoride products and their risks and benefits. Numerous recent investigations in this area of research are reviewed and discussed. Data from these research investigations point to the need for care when high-potency F products are used, especially in young children. Oral-retained F doses following four-minute topical application procedures ranged from 10 to 31 mg when no suction devices or patient expectoration was utilized. Following the use of suctioning devices, oral-retained F doses ranged from 6 to 12 mg, a clinically unacceptable level. Following the use of suctioning devices plus patient expectoration, the oral-retained F doses were reduced to from 2 to 7.5 mg, depending on type of F product and application system. The following recommendation for topical application of high-potency F products are made: (1) No more than 2 g of gel per tray or approximately 40% of tray capacity should be dispensed. Even more conservative amounts should be considered for small children. (2) Because patients may have the need to swallow during a four-minute topical application procedure, the use of a saliva ejector during the procedure is recommended. (3) Following the four-minute application procedure, the patient should be instructed to expectorate thoroughly for from 30 sec to one min, regardless of whether high-speed suction is utilized. Expectoration is probably the single most effective way of reducing orally retained fluoride. (4) When utilizing custom individually fitted trays for patients requiring daily or weekly application of a high-F-concentration product, utilize only 5 to 10 drops of product per tray.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3475324     DOI: 10.1177/00220345870660051701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  7 in total

1.  Periodic health examination, 1995 update: 2. Prevention of dental caries. The Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors:  D W Lewis; A I Ismail
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1995-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Tissue response of gastric mucosa after ingestion of fluoride.

Authors:  C J Spak; S Sjöstedt; L Eleborg; B Veress; L Perbeck; J Ekstrand
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-06-24

Review 3.  Topical fluoride as a cause of dental fluorosis in children.

Authors:  May Cm Wong; Anne-Marie Glenny; Boyd Wk Tsang; Edward Cm Lo; Helen V Worthington; Valeria Cc Marinho
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

4.  Effect of fluoride gels supplemented with sodium trimetaphosphate in reducing demineralization.

Authors:  Marcelle Danelon; Eliana Mitsue Takeshita; Ligia Carla Peixoto; Kikue Takebayashi Sassaki; Alberto Carlos Botazzo Delbem
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Time-Dependent Anti-Demineralization Effect of Silver Diamine Fluoride.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Ahn; Ji-Woong Kim; Young-Mi Yoon; Nan-Young Lee; Sang-Ho Lee; Myeong-Kwan Jih
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-24

6.  Effect of a Preventive Oral Health Program Starting during Pregnancy: A Case-Control Study Comparing Immigrant and Native Women and Their Children.

Authors:  María García-Pola; Agueda González-Díaz; José Manuel García-Martín
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Effect of fluoridated varnish and silver diamine fluoride solution on enamel demineralization: pH-cycling study.

Authors:  Alberto Carlos Botazzo Delbem; Maurício Bergamaschi; Kikue Takebayashi Sassaki; Robson Frederico Cunha
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.698

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.