Ezekiel Maloney1,2, Francisco A Perez3,4, Ramesh S Iyer3,4, Randolph K Otto3,4, Jason N Wright3,4, Sarah J Menashe3,4, Daniel S Hippe5, Dennis W W Shaw3,4, A Luana Stanescu3,4. 1. Department of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA. eze@uw.edu. 2. Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. eze@uw.edu. 3. Department of Radiology, Seattle Children's Hospital, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 5. Clinical Biostatistics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, Seattle, 98109, WA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients with optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) typically undergo a large number of follow-up MRI brain exams with gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM), which have been associated with gadolinium tissue retention. Therefore, careful consideration of GBCM use in these children is warranted. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether GBCM is necessary for OPG MR imaging response assessment using a blinded, non-inferiority, multi-reader study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified children with OPG and either stable disease or change in tumor size on MRI using a regional cancer registry serving the U.S. Pacific Northwest. For each child, the two relevant, consecutive MRI studies were anonymized and standardized into two imaging sets excluding or including GBCM-enhanced images. Exam pairs were compiled from 42 children with isolated OPG (19 with neurofibromatosis type 1), from a population of 106 children with OPG. We included 28 exam pairs in which there was a change in size between exams. Seven pediatric radiologists measured tumor sizes during three blinded sessions, spaced by at least 1 week. The first measuring session excluded GBCM-enhanced sequences; the others did not. The primary endpoint was intra-reader agreement for ≥ 25% change in axial cross-product measurement, using a 12% non-inferiority threshold. RESULTS: Analysis demonstrated an overall 1.2% difference (95% confidence interval, -3.2% to 5.5%) for intra-reader agreement using a non-GBCM-enhanced protocol and background variability. CONCLUSION: A non-GBCM-enhanced protocol was non-inferior to a GBCM-enhanced protocol for assessing change in size of isolated OPGs on follow-up MRI exams.
BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients with optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) typically undergo a large number of follow-up MRI brain exams with gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM), which have been associated with gadolinium tissue retention. Therefore, careful consideration of GBCM use in these children is warranted. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether GBCM is necessary for OPG MR imaging response assessment using a blinded, non-inferiority, multi-reader study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified children with OPG and either stable disease or change in tumor size on MRI using a regional cancer registry serving the U.S. Pacific Northwest. For each child, the two relevant, consecutive MRI studies were anonymized and standardized into two imaging sets excluding or including GBCM-enhanced images. Exam pairs were compiled from 42 children with isolated OPG (19 with neurofibromatosis type 1), from a population of 106 children with OPG. We included 28 exam pairs in which there was a change in size between exams. Seven pediatric radiologists measured tumor sizes during three blinded sessions, spaced by at least 1 week. The first measuring session excluded GBCM-enhanced sequences; the others did not. The primary endpoint was intra-reader agreement for ≥ 25% change in axial cross-product measurement, using a 12% non-inferiority threshold. RESULTS: Analysis demonstrated an overall 1.2% difference (95% confidence interval, -3.2% to 5.5%) for intra-reader agreement using a non-GBCM-enhanced protocol and background variability. CONCLUSION: A non-GBCM-enhanced protocol was non-inferior to a GBCM-enhanced protocol for assessing change in size of isolated OPGs on follow-up MRI exams.
Authors: L Kornreich; S Blaser; M Schwarz; A Shuper; T H Vishne; I J Cohen; R Faingold; S Michovitz; B Koplewitz; G Horev Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2001 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.825