| Literature DB >> 34751667 |
Agnes Jihae Kim1,2, Jisun Yang3, Yihyun Jang4, Joon Sang Baek5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) is a highly infectious disease. Negative perceptions and insufficient knowledge have made its eradication difficult. Recently, mobile health care interventions, such as an anti-TB chatbot developed by the research team, have emerged in support of TB eradication programs. However, before the anti-TB chatbot is deployed, it is important to understand the factors that predict its acceptance by the population.Entities:
Keywords: chatbot; mobile phone; technology acceptance model; tuberculosis
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34751667 PMCID: PMC8663686 DOI: 10.2196/26424
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth ISSN: 2291-5222 Impact factor: 4.773
Figure 1Antituberculosis chatbot user interface.
Participant information of study 1 (N=26; site: Seoul; year: 2020).
| Demographics | Values, n (%) | |||
|
| ||||
| Gender | ||||
|
| Male | 16 (100) | ||
|
| Female | 0 (0) | ||
| Age (years) |
| |||
|
| 30s | 2 (13) | ||
|
| 40s | 3 (19) | ||
|
| 50s | 3 (19) | ||
|
| 60s | 6 (38) | ||
|
| 70s | 2 (13) | ||
| Experience of smartphone use | ||||
|
| Yes | 9 (56) | ||
|
| No | 7 (44) | ||
| Experience of chatbot use | ||||
|
| Yes | 0 (0) | ||
|
| No | 16 (100) | ||
|
| ||||
|
| Academia | 1 (10) | ||
|
| Hospital | 1 (10) | ||
|
| Shelters | 2 (20) | ||
|
| Support facilities | 5 (50) | ||
|
| Housing provider | 1 (10) | ||
aTB: tuberculosis.
Figure 2Hypothetical model of study 2.
Figure 3Perceived usefulness of the antituberculosis chatbot among potential users (n=the number of times a theme was mentioned by the interviewees of study 1).
Figure 4Perceived ease of use of the antituberculosis chatbot among potential users (n=the number of times a theme was mentioned by the interviewees of study 1; positive and neutral comments in normal and negative comments in italics).
Figure 5Facilitating conditions of the antituberculosis chatbot (n=the number of times a theme was mentioned by the interviewees of study 1; positive and neutral comments in normal and negative comments in italics).
Figure 6Social influence of the antituberculosis chatbot in potential users. It should be noted that n=number of times a theme was mentioned by the interviewees of study 1.
Participant demographics of study 2 (N=123; site: Seoul; year: 2020).
| Demographics | Values, n (%) | ||
|
| |||
|
| Female | 60 (48.7) | |
|
| Male | 63 (51.2) | |
|
| |||
|
| 22 to 29 | 26 (21.1) | |
|
| 30 to 39 | 33 (26.8) | |
|
| 40 to 49 | 34 (27.6) | |
|
| 50 to 59 | 9 (7.3) | |
|
| 60 to 85 | 21 (17.1) | |
|
| |||
|
| Yes | 16 (13) | |
|
| No | 107 (86.9) | |
|
| |||
|
| Yes | 120 (97.5) | |
|
| No | 3 (2.5) | |
|
| |||
|
| Yes | 61 (49.5) | |
|
| No | 62 (50.4) | |
Reliability and convergent validity of the measurement model in study 2.
| Construct and items | Factor loadings | Cronbach α | Composite reliability coefficient | Average variance extracted | ||||
|
|
| .854 | 0.902 | 0.697 | ||||
|
| PU 1 | 0.893 |
|
|
| |||
|
| PU 2 | 0.859 |
|
|
| |||
|
| PU 3 | 0.860 |
|
|
| |||
|
| PU 4 | 0.783 |
|
|
| |||
|
| .927 | 0.948 | 0.822 | |||||
|
| PEOU 1 | 0.870 |
|
|
| |||
|
| PEOU 2 | 0.892 |
|
|
| |||
|
| PEOU 3 | 0.941 |
|
|
| |||
|
| PEOU 4 | 0.920 |
|
|
| |||
|
|
| .858 | 0.904 | 0.702 | ||||
|
| SI 1 | 0.801 |
|
|
| |||
|
| SI 2 | 0.852 |
|
|
| |||
|
| SI 3 | 0.887 |
|
|
| |||
|
| SI 4 | 0.808 |
|
|
| |||
|
|
| .798 | 0.868 | 0.625 | ||||
|
| PR 1 | 0.860 |
|
|
| |||
|
| PR 2 | 0.852 |
|
|
| |||
|
| PR 3 | 0.635 |
|
|
| |||
|
| PR 4 | 0.847 |
|
|
| |||
|
|
| .899 | 0.930 | 0.768 | ||||
|
| ATC 1 | 0.834 |
|
|
| |||
|
| ATC 2 | 0.893 |
|
|
| |||
|
| ATC 3 | 0.899 |
|
|
| |||
|
| ATC 4 | 0.878 |
|
|
| |||
|
|
| .932 | 0.951 | 0.831 | ||||
|
| BI 1 | 0.851 |
|
|
| |||
|
| BI 2 | 0.931 |
|
|
| |||
|
| BI 3 | 0.924 |
|
|
| |||
|
| BI 4 | 0.937 |
|
|
| |||
aPU: perceived usefulness.
bPEOU: perceived ease of use.
cSI: social influence.
dPR: facilitating conditions.
eATC: attitude to chatbot.
fBI: behavioral intention.
Discriminant validity of the measurement model in study 2.
| Constructs | Perceived usefulness | Perceived ease of use | Social influence | Facilitating conditions | Attitude to chatbot | Behavioral intention |
| Perceived usefulness | 0.835 | 0.512 | 0.81 | 0.519 | 0.714 | 0.588 |
| Perceived ease of use | 0.512 | 0.906 | 0.422 | 0.707 | 0.325 | 0.410 |
| Social influence | 0.81 | 0.422 | 0.838 | 0.508 | 0.743 | 0.664 |
| Facilitating conditions | 0.519 | 0.707 | 0.508 | 0.791 | 0.421 | 0.494 |
| Attitude to chatbot | 0.714 | 0.325 | 0.743 | 0.421 | 0.876 | 0.713 |
| Behavioral intention | 0.588 | 0.410 | 0.664 | 0.494 | 0.713 | 0.911 |
Figure 7Path analysis results for study 2.
Results of the structural model in study 2.
| Endogenous variable and exogenous variable | β | ||||
|
|
| ||||
|
| Perceived ease of use | .15 | 2.062 | .04 | |
|
| Social influence | .746 | 12.023 | <.001 | |
|
|
| ||||
|
| Perceived usefulness | .720 | 11.314 | <.001 | |
|
| Perceived ease of use | −.012 | 0.151 | .88 | |
|
|
| ||||
|
| Facilitating conditions | .235 | 2.242 | .03 | |
|
| Attitude to chatbot | .614 | 7.438 | <.001 | |
Results of the multigroup analysis.
| Path | TBa history group | Non–TB history group | Difference | TB history group | Non–TB history group | |
|
| β | β | β |
| ||
| PUb→ATCc | .662 | .733 | −.071 | .002 | <.001 | .72 |
| PEOUd→ATC | .186 | −.046 | .233 | .41 | .60 | .34 |
| PEOU→PU | −.118 | .194 | −.313 | .56 | .008 | .13 |
| ATC→BIe | .113 | .66 | −.547 | .66 | <.001 | .01 |
| SIf→PU | .906 | .726 | .18 | <.001 | <.001 | .34 |
| FCg→BI | .826 | .175 | .651 | .002 | .07 | .02 |
aTB: tuberculosis.
bPU: perceived usefulness.
cATC: attitude to chatbot.
dPEOU: perceived ease of use.
eBI: behavioral intention.
fSI: social influence.
gFC: facilitating conditions.