Literature DB >> 34750661

Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR neurography as an adjunct to conventional MRI for the assessment of brachial plexus pathology.

Robert M Kwee1, Rob A P Borghans2, Rik J M Bruls2, Bram A C M Fasen2, Damir Kuburic2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DW) MR neurography as an adjunct to conventional MRI for the assessment of brachial plexus pathology.
METHODS: DW MR neurography scans (short tau inversion recovery fat suppression and b-value of 800 s/mm2) of 15 consecutive patients with and 45 randomly selected patients without brachial plexus abnormalities were independently and blindly reviewed by a 5th year radiology resident, a junior neuroradiologist, and a senior neuroradiologist.
RESULTS: Median interpretation times ranged between 20 and 30 s. Interobserver agreement was substantial (κ coefficients of 0.715-0.739). For the 5th year radiology resident, sensitivity was 53.3% (95% CI, 30.1-75.2%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI, 92.1-100%). For the junior neuroradiologist, sensitivity was 66.7% (95% CI, 41.7-84.8%) and specificity was 100% (95% CI, 92.1-100%). For the senior neuroradiologist, sensitivity was 73.3% (95% CI, 48.1-89.1%) and specificity was 95.6% (95% CI, 85.2-98.8%). Traumatic injury, metastases, radiation-induced plexopathy, schwannoma, and inflammatory process of unknown cause could be detected by the majority of readers (100% detection rate for each disease entity by at least two readers). Neuralgic amyotrophy, iatrogenic injury after first rib resection, and cervical disc herniation causing root compression were not detected by the majority of readers (0% detection rate for each disease entity by at least two readers).
CONCLUSION: DW MR neurography may be a useful adjunct when assessing for brachial plexus abnormalities, because interpretation time is relatively short and the majority of abnormalities can be detected. KEY POINTS: • DW MR neurography interpretation time of the brachial plexus is relatively short (median interpretation times of 20 to 30 s). • Interobserver agreement between three readers with different levels of experience is substantial (κ coefficients of 0.715 to 0.739). • DW MR neurography can detect brachial plexus abnormalities with moderate sensitivity (53.3 to 73.3%) and high specificity (95.6 to 100%).
© 2021. European Society of Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brachial Plexus; Diagnostic imaging; Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging; Sensitivity and specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34750661     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08324-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   7.034


  14 in total

Review 1.  Brachial plexus anatomy.

Authors:  Charles F Leinberry; Marwan A Wehbé
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.907

Review 2.  MR imaging of the brachial plexus.

Authors:  Amelie M Lutz; Garry Gold; Christopher Beaulieu
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 2.264

3.  Whole-body magnetic resonance neurography.

Authors:  Tomohiro Yamashita; Thomas C Kwee; Taro Takahara
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Diffusion-weighted MR neurography of the brachial plexus: feasibility study.

Authors:  Taro Takahara; Jeroen Hendrikse; Tomohiro Yamashita; Willem P T M Mali; Thomas C Kwee; Yutaka Imai; Peter R Luijten
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  MR Imaging of the brachial plexus.

Authors:  Igor Mikityansky; Eric L Zager; David M Yousem; Laurie A Loevner
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 2.266

Review 6.  MRI of the brachial plexus: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Hendrik W van Es; Thomas L Bollen; Hans P M van Heesewijk
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Diffusion-weighted MR neurography of extremity nerves with unidirectional motion-probing gradients at 3 T: feasibility study.

Authors:  Lianxin Zhao; Guangbin Wang; Linlin Yang; Lebin Wu; Xiangtao Lin; Avneesh Chhabra
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): features and potential applications in oncology.

Authors:  Thomas C Kwee; Taro Takahara; Reiji Ochiai; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Peter R Luijten
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  MRI of brachial plexopathies.

Authors:  J Sureka; R A Cherian; M Alexander; B P Thomas
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 2.350

10.  STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Patrick M Bossuyt; Johannes B Reitsma; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Paul P Glasziou; Les Irwig; Jeroen G Lijmer; David Moher; Drummond Rennie; Henrica C W de Vet; Herbert Y Kressel; Nader Rifai; Robert M Golub; Douglas G Altman; Lotty Hooft; Daniël A Korevaar; Jérémie F Cohen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-10-28
View more
  2 in total

1.  Value of High-Resolution MRI in the Diagnosis of Brachial Plexus Injury in Infants and Young Children.

Authors:  Qun Lao; Yuzhu Jia; Kaiyu Zhao; Kun Liu; Jianju Feng
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-06-18

Review 2.  Diagnostic performance of MRI and CT in diagnosing necrotizing soft tissue infection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robert M Kwee; Thomas C Kwee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 2.199

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.