Literature DB >> 34749843

The Effectiveness of Hot Bead Sterilization in Maintaining Sterile Surgical Instrument Tips across Sequential Mouse Surgeries.

Julie A Holdridge1, Madison S Nichols2, William D Dupont3, Carissa P Jones1, Katherine A Shuster1.   

Abstract

One strategy commonly employed for rodent surgeries is a "tips-only" surgical technique, which restricts the surgeon to using only the sterile working ends of the surgical instruments to manipulate the surgical field and sterilizes instrument tips with a hot bead sterilizer between consecutive rodents. Despite the common use of the "tips-only" technique, research is lacking on the number of sequential surgeries for which the same set of hot bead-sterilized instruments can be used before introducing bacterial contamination. We performed serial mouse surgeries using the "tips-only" technique under 3 different conditions (aseptic, fur contamination, or cecal contamination) and assessed aerobic bacterial growth before and after each round of hot bead sterilization. Instrument tips showed an increasing probability of contamination of at least one instrument in a series of consecutive surgeries. The probability that all surgical instrument tips in the series were sterile after hot bead sterilization fell by 4% for each surgery involving inadvertent or fur contamination and by 11.5% for each surgery with contamination for all surgical types combined (including entering the gastrointestinal tract). Based on our results, hot bead sterilization is not adequate for surgeries associated with gross contamination. Under our experimental conditions and assuming independence of outcomes between consecutive surgeries, up to 5 surgeries associated with minor or inadvertent contamination could be performed in series with a probability higher than 80% that all instrument tips were sterile for all surgeries. A case-by-case risk assessment should be conducted to derive institutional guidelines for the maximal number of surgeries that can be performed in sequence using the "tips-only" technique with hot bead sterilization of the same set of surgical instruments between surgeries. Full sterilization of instruments after every surgery provides the greatest confidence in maintaining sterility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34749843      PMCID: PMC8628527          DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  23 in total

1.  Efficacy and limitations of an ATP-based monitoring system.

Authors:  Danielle E Turner; Erin K Daugherity; Craig Altier; Kirk J Maurer
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Guidelines for rodent survival surgery.

Authors:  Jan Bernal; Margi Baldwin; Teresa Gleason; Steven Kuhlman; Gail Moore; Michael Talcott
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.533

3.  Improving risk-adjusted measures of surgical site infection for the national healthcare safety network.

Authors:  Yi Mu; Jonathan R Edwards; Teresa C Horan; Sandra I Berrios-Torres; Scott K Fridkin
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Dental instrument sterilization by glass bead conduction of heat.

Authors:  L I Grossman
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  The relationship between holding time and the bacterial load on surgical instruments.

Authors:  Duygu Percin; Hafize Sav; Hatice Tuna Hormet-Oz; Murat Karauz
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 6.  The influence of volume and experience on individual surgical performance: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mahiben Maruthappu; Barnabas J Gilbert; Majd A El-Harasis; Myura Nagendran; Peter McCulloch; Antoine Duclos; Matthew J Carty
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  ACLAM Position Statement on Rodent Surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  Assessment of Mouse Handling Techniques During Cage Changing.

Authors:  Carolyn M Doerning; Sarah E Thurston; Jason S Villano; Carian L Kaska; Tracy D Vozheiko; Scott A Soleimanpour; Jennifer L Lofgren
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  Comparison of Aqueous and Alcohol-based Agents for Presurgical Skin Preparation Methods in Mice.

Authors:  Jacquelyn M Del Valle; Elizabeth A Fisk; Erica L Noland; Daewoo Pak; Jingyi Zhang; Marcus J Crim; Frank R Lawrence; F Claire Hankenson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 10.  Prolonged Operative Duration Increases Risk of Surgical Site Infections: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hang Cheng; Brian Po-Han Chen; Ireena M Soleas; Nicole C Ferko; Chris G Cameron; Piet Hinoul
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2017 Aug/Sep       Impact factor: 2.150

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.