| Literature DB >> 34749417 |
Yuri Campos1,2, Arturo Casado3, João Guilherme Vieira1, Miller Guimarães2,4, Leandro Sant'Ana1, Luis Leitão1,5, Sandro Fernandes da Silva2,6, Paulo Henrique Silva Marques de Azevedo4, Jeferson Vianna1, Raúl Domínguez2,7.
Abstract
Training-intensity distribution (TID) is considered the key factor to optimize performance in endurance sports. This systematic review aimed to: I) characterize the TID typically used by middle-and long-distance runners; II) compare the effect of different types of TID on endurance performance and its physiological determinants; III) determine the extent to which different TID quantification methods can calculate same TID outcomes from a given training program. The keywords and search strategy identified 20 articles in the research databases. These articles demonstrated differences in the quantification of the different training-intensity zones among quantification methods (i. e. session-rating of perceived exertion, heart rate, blood lactate, race pace, and running speed). The studies that used greater volumes of low-intensity training such as those characterized by pyramidal and polarized TID approaches, reported greater improvements in endurance performance than those which used a threshold TID. Thus, it seems that the combination of high-volume at low-intensity (≥ 70% of overall training volume) and low-volume at threshold and high-intensity interval training (≤ 30%) is necessary to optimize endurance training adaptations in middle-and long-distance runners. Moreover, monitoring training via multiple mechanisms that systematically encompasses objective and subjective TID quantification methods can help coaches/researches to make better decisions. Thieme. All rights reserved.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34749417 DOI: 10.1055/a-1559-3623
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Sports Med ISSN: 0172-4622 Impact factor: 3.118