Literature DB >> 34749051

Monitoring, management, and outcome of hypotension in Intensive Care Unit patients, an international survey of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

W H van der Ven1, J Schuurmans2, J Schenk1, S Roerhorst1, T G V Cherpanath2, W K Lagrand2, P Thoral3, P W G Elbers3, P R Tuinman3, T W L Scheeren4, J Bakker5, B F Geerts6, D P Veelo1, F Paulus7, A P J Vlaar8.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hypotension in the ICU is common, yet management is challenging and variable. Insight in management by ICU physicians and nurses may improve patient care and guide future hypotension treatment trials and guidelines.
METHODS: We conducted an international survey among ICU personnel to provide insight in monitoring, management, and perceived consequences of hypotension.
RESULTS: Out of 1464 respondents, 1197 (81.7%) were included (928 physicians (77.5%) and 269 nurses (22.5%)). The majority indicated that hypotension is underdiagnosed (55.4%) and largely preventable (58.8%). Nurses are primarily in charge of monitoring changes in blood pressure, physicians are in charge of hypotension treatment. Balanced crystalloids, dobutamine, norepinephrine, and Trendelenburg position were the most frequently reported fluid, inotrope, vasopressor, and positional maneuver used to treat hypotension. Reported complications believed to be related to hypotension were AKI and myocardial injury. Most ICUs do not have a specific hypotension treatment guideline or protocol (70.6%), but the majority would like to have one in the future (58.1%).
CONCLUSIONS: Both physicians and nurses report that hypotension in ICU patients is underdiagnosed, preventable, and believe that hypotension influences morbidity. Hypotension management is generally not protocolized, but the majority of respondents would like to have a specific hypotension management protocol.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; Critical care; Hypotension; Nursing care; Outcome; Surveys and questionnaires

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34749051     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  1 in total

1.  Assuring the safety of AI-based clinical decision support systems: a case study of the AI Clinician for sepsis treatment.

Authors:  Paul Festor; Yan Jia; Anthony C Gordon; A Aldo Faisal; Ibrahim Habli; Matthieu Komorowski
Journal:  BMJ Health Care Inform       Date:  2022-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.