Literature DB >> 34748470

The Pressure Paradox: Abdominal Compression to Detect Lung Hyperinflation in COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Dekel Stavi1,2,3,4, Alberto Goffi1,5,3,6, Mufid Al Shalabi3,7, Thomas Piraino1,3,8, Lu Chen1,6, Robert Jackson5, Laurent Brochard1,5,3,6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34748470      PMCID: PMC8787257          DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202104-1062IM

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1073-449X            Impact factor:   21.405


× No keyword cloud information.
A 57-year-old male with respiratory failure secondary to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pneumonia was intubated for worsening hypoxemia 22 days after onset of symptoms. Past medical history was significant for type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, mild asthma, distal pancreatectomy in the context of severe necrotizing pancreatitis (2003), small hiatal hernia, and 20-pack-year smoking. His body mass index was 20.7 kg/m2. He was ventilated with ultraprotective volume-control ventilation (Vt of 4.5 ml/kg predicted body weight) and, owing to lack of recruitability as assessed by the recruitment-to-inflation ratio (0.2) (1), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 6 cm H2O. Chest radiography demonstrated dense bilateral consolidations to the lower lobes and periphery of the mid-lung zones associated with mild to moderate interstitial edema and pulmonary vascular prominence. A computed tomographic scan confirmed bilateral widespread subpleural consolidations associated with patchy peripheral ground-glass opacities with areas of lobular sparing. On Day 4 after intubation, while the patient was sedated and paralyzed, and in supine semirecumbent position, we noticed that a moderate sustained manual compression at the level of the patient’s mesogastrium was associated with a paradoxical and almost immediate drop in both peak and plateau pressures that persisted for the entire duration of abdominal compression (see Figure 1 and Video 1) (2). Pressure values returned to baseline as soon as compression was released. This phenomenon was reproducible over the course of several days.
Figure 1.

Ventilator screenshots demonstrating the effect of a moderate sustained manual abdominal compression and its release on airway pressures and respiratory mechanics in a sedated and paralyzed patient with severe respiratory failure secondary to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection. The red rectangles represent enlargement of the pressure–time curve profiles. A reduction of the pressure over time concavity during abdominal compression, suggesting reduction in tidal hyperinflation, can be seen.

Video 1.

Video demonstrating the paradoxical effect of a moderate sustained manual abdominal compression and its release on airway pressures and respiratory mechanics in a sedated and paralyzed patient with severe respiratory failure secondary to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection. p/t = pressure–time.

Ventilator screenshots demonstrating the effect of a moderate sustained manual abdominal compression and its release on airway pressures and respiratory mechanics in a sedated and paralyzed patient with severe respiratory failure secondary to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection. The red rectangles represent enlargement of the pressure–time curve profiles. A reduction of the pressure over time concavity during abdominal compression, suggesting reduction in tidal hyperinflation, can be seen. The measured quasistatic (3) airway and static esophageal and bladder pressures (and their derived parameters of lung and chest wall respiratory mechanics; https://rtmaven.com) are shown in Table 1 and Video 1. Visual observation of pressure–time curve profiles revealed a reduction of the pressure over time concavity during abdominal compression (see Figure 1 and Video 1) (2). This observation suggests that the pressure applied to the patient’s abdomen, by increasing intrathoracic pressure, caused a reduction in the end-expiratory lung volume and a downward shift of the pressure–volume curve, with reduction in tidal hyperinflation and possibly increase in tidal recruitment. The combination of these two effects led to the paradoxical improvement of lung and respiratory system compliance, and of lung stress (4, 5).
Table 1.

Measured Airway, Esophageal, and Bladder Pressures, and Derived Lung and Chest Wall Respiratory Mechanics Parameters

ParameterBaselineDuring Abdominal Compression
Measured  
 Exhaled Vt, ml384386
 Peak pressure, cm H2O3025
 Plateau pressure, cm H2O2521
 Total positive end-expiratory pressure, cm H2O67
 End-expiratory esophageal pressure, cm H2O35
 End-inspiratory esophageal pressure, cm H2O58
 Bladder pressure, cm H2O1422
Derived  
 Driving pressure, cm H2O1914
 Respiratory system compliance, ml/cm H2O2028
 Lung compliance, ml/cm H2O2335
 Chest wall compliance, ml/cm H2O192129
 Elastance lung/elastance respiratory system0.890.79
 Transpulmonary plateau pressure (elastance-derived method), cm H2O2217
 Airway resistance, cm H2O/L/s65
Measured Airway, Esophageal, and Bladder Pressures, and Derived Lung and Chest Wall Respiratory Mechanics Parameters Since our original observation in June 2020, we and other groups (5) have identified several patients with severe COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome displaying similar paradoxical improvements of respiratory mechanics during abdominal compression. Such a simple bedside maneuver can detect lung hyperinflation even in patients mechanically ventilated with ultraprotective lung strategies and low PEEP. Video demonstrating the paradoxical effect of a moderate sustained manual abdominal compression and its release on airway pressures and respiratory mechanics in a sedated and paralyzed patient with severe respiratory failure secondary to coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection. p/t = pressure–time.
  5 in total

1.  Airway pressure-time curve profile (stress index) detects tidal recruitment/hyperinflation in experimental acute lung injury.

Authors:  Salvatore Grasso; Pierpaolo Terragni; Luciana Mascia; Vito Fanelli; Michel Quintel; Peter Herrmann; Goran Hedenstierna; Arthur S Slutsky; V Marco Ranieri
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 2.  Fifty Years of Research in ARDS. Respiratory Mechanics in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Authors:  William R Henderson; Lu Chen; Marcelo B P Amato; Laurent J Brochard
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Potential for Lung Recruitment Estimated by the Recruitment-to-Inflation Ratio in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Lu Chen; Lorenzo Del Sorbo; Domenico L Grieco; Detajin Junhasavasdikul; Nuttapol Rittayamai; Ibrahim Soliman; Michael C Sklar; Michela Rauseo; Niall D Ferguson; Eddy Fan; Jean-Christophe M Richard; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Paradoxically Improved Respiratory Compliance With Abdominal Compression in COVID-19 ARDS.

Authors:  Rebecca L Kummer; Robert S Shapiro; John J Marini; Joshua S Huelster; James W Leatherman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 5.  Improving lung compliance by external compression of the chest wall.

Authors:  John J Marini; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Paradoxical Positioning: Does "Head Up" Always Improve Mechanics and Lung Protection?

Authors:  John Selickman; Philip S Crooke; Pierre Tawfik; David J Dries; Luciano Gattinoni; John J Marini
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 9.296

2.  Paradoxical response to chest wall loading predicts a favorable mechanical response to reduction in tidal volume or PEEP.

Authors:  John Selickman; Pierre Tawfik; Philip S Crooke; David J Dries; Jonathan Shelver; Luciano Gattinoni; John J Marini
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 19.334

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.