Literature DB >> 34748361

Zoom disrupts the rhythm of conversation.

Julie E Boland1, Pedro Fonseca2, Ilana Mermelstein2, Myles Williamson2.   

Abstract

Small, variable transmission delays over Zoom disrupt the typical rhythm of conversation, leading to delays in turn initiation. This study compared local and remote (Zoom) turn transition times using both a tightly controlled yes/no Question and Answer (Q&A) paradigm (Corps et al., 2018) and unscripted conversation. In the Q&A paradigm (Experiment 1), participants responded yes/no as quickly as possible to prerecorded questions. Half of the questions were played over Zoom and half were played locally from their own computer. Local responses had an average latency of 297 ms, whereas remote responses averaged 976 ms. These large increases in transition times over Zoom are far greater than the estimated 30-70 ms of audio transmission delay, suggesting disruption of automated mechanisms that normally guide the timing of turn initiation in conversation. In face-to-face conversations (Experiment 2), turn transition times averaged 135 ms, but transition times for the same dyads over Zoom averaged 487 ms. We consider the possibility that electronic transmission delays disrupt neural oscillators that normally synchronize on syllable rate, at around, 150-300 ms per cycle (Wilson & Wilson, 2005), and enable interlocutors to effortlessly and precisely time the initiation of their turns. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34748361     DOI: 10.1037/xge0001150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  3 in total

1.  "Why couldn't we do this more often?": exploring the feasibility of virtual and distributed work in product design engineering.

Authors:  Sharon Ferguson; Kimberly Lai; James Chen; Safa Faidi; Kevin Leonardo; Alison Olechowski
Journal:  Res Eng Des       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.964

2.  Dynamics of Remote Communication: Movement Coordination in Video-Mediated and Face-to-Face Conversations.

Authors:  Julian Zubek; Ewa Nagórska; Joanna Komorowska-Mach; Katarzyna Skowrońska; Konrad Zieliński; Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.738

3.  Video meeting signals: Experimental evidence for a technique to improve the experience of video conferencing.

Authors:  Paul D Hills; Mackenzie V Q Clavin; Miles R A Tufft; Matthias S Gobel; Daniel C Richardson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.