| Literature DB >> 34748016 |
M A González1, D Bravo-Barriga2, P M Alarcón-Elbal3, J M Álvarez-Calero4, C Quero4, M Ferraguti5, S López4.
Abstract
Lachryphagous males of Phortica variegata (Fallén, 1823) are gaining increasing attention in Europe, as they act as vectors of the nematode Thelazia callipaeda Railliet & Henry, 1910, causal agent of thelaziosis, an emergent zoonotic disease. Currently, there are no effective control strategies against the vector, and surveillance and monitoring rely on time-consuming and nonselective sampling methods. Our aim was to improve the knowledge about the population dynamics and the chemical ecology of the species. A total of 5,726 P. variegata flies (96.4% males and 3.6% females, mostly gravid) were collected in field experiments during June-September of 2020 in an oak forest in northern Spain. Our results indicate that 1) by means of sweep netting a significantly higher number of captures were found both around the collector´s body and in the air than at ground level; 2) a positive relationship was detected between the abundance of Phortica flies and temperature, with two significant peaks of abundance at 24 and 33°C; 3) the blend of red wine and cider vinegar was the most attractive bait; 4) yellow traps captured fewer flies compared to black and transparent traps; and 5) a significant reduction toward vinegar and wine was detected in presence of the phenolic monoterpenoid carvacrol. In addition, all the males (n = 690) analyzed by both molecular detection and dissection resulted negative for the presence of T. callipaeda larvae. Overall, these findings provide a better understanding of the vector in terms of monitoring and management strategies.Entities:
Keywords: bait; color; field test; netting; zoophilic fruit fly
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 34748016 PMCID: PMC8755994 DOI: 10.1093/jme/tjab171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Entomol ISSN: 0022-2585 Impact factor: 2.278
Fig. 1.Sampling site composed of Quercus pyrenaica, and inset of the color traps (from left to right: black, red, transparent, and yellow) used in Experiment C (top right; A). Specimens of Phortica variegata in ethanol (70%; B). Lateral view of male (left) and female (right) of P. variegata, respectively (C). Lateral view of the abdomen of a gravid female (D).
Fig. 2.Partial dependence plot for the RF analyses between Phortica variegata abundance (log-transformed) and the temperature (°C) of each sampling date (n = 247).
Fig. 3.Box-and-whiskers plots of the number of Phortica variegata catches (log-transformed) in traps with different baits. Boxes with different superscript letters are statistically different (P ≤ 0.05).
Fig. 4.Box-and-whiskers plots of the number of Phortica variegata catches (log-transformed) in trap bottles of different colors baited with the binary blend of cider vinegar and red wine (50 ml). Boxes with different superscript letters are statistically different (P ≤ 0.05).
Fig. 5.Box-and-whiskers plots of the number of Phortica variegata catches (log-transformed) in traps baited with 10 ml of the binary blend of cider vinegar and red wine (VW), and the combination of VW and carvacrol (5 mg/d), eucalyptol (75 mg/d), or thymol (15 mg/d). Asterisk denotes statistical differences between treatments and control (P ≤ 0.05).