| Literature DB >> 34747302 |
Mark McMillan1,2, Helen S Marshall1,2, Peter Richmond3,4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Vaccination is the most effective method of protecting people from invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). Of all the capsular groups, B is the most common cause of invasive meningococcal disease in many parts of the world. Despite this, adolescent meningococcal B vaccine programs have not been implemented globally, partly due to the lack of evidence for herd immunity afforded by meningococcal B vaccines. AREAS COVERED: This review aims to synthesize the available evidence on recombinant 4 CMenB vaccines' ability to reduce pharyngeal carriage and therefore provide indirect (herd) immunity against IMD. EXPERT OPINION: There is some evidence that the 4CMenB vaccine may induce cross-protection against non-B carriage of meningococci. However, the overall body of evidence does not support a clinically significant reduction in carriage of disease-associated or group B meningococci following 4CMenB vaccination. No additional cost-benefit from herd immunity effects should be included when modeling the cost-effectiveness of 4CMenB vaccine programs against group B IMD. 4CMenB immunization programs should focus on direct (individual) protection for groups at greatest risk of meningococcal disease. Future meningococcal B and combination vaccines being developed should consider the impact of the vaccine on carriage as part of their clinical evaluation.Entities:
Keywords: 4cmenb; Bexsero; Neisseria meningitidis; carriage; herd immunity; herd protection; meningococcal
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34747302 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2022.2003708
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Expert Rev Vaccines ISSN: 1476-0584 Impact factor: 5.217