Literature DB >> 34746994

What is optimal timing of warming for transferring vitrified cleavage stage of day 3 slow-growing embryos? A cohort retrospective study.

Lan Geng1, Jia-Hui Wu1,2, Jia-Qi Luo1, Rang Liu1, Jun-Sheng Li3, Yu Shi1, Amanda Kallen4, Tian-Ren Wang5, Xi Xia6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate optimal warming time, the early warming or the routine warming time, for transferring vitrified-warmed and cultured overnight cleavage stage of the slow-growing embryos on day 3 in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study from January 2017 to July 2018. A total of 705 FET patients aged < 40 years were included and 1486 embryos were formed, of which 1366 embryos were eventually transferred.
RESULTS: For slow-growing embryos, the clinical pregnancy rate of early warming group [152/468 (32.5%)] was significantly higher than that of routine warming group (55/235 (23.4%)) [OR 1.39 (CI 1.06-1.81), p = 0.01], while there was no statistically significant difference in pregnancy loss in early warming group [39/170 (22.9%)] versus in routine warming group [16/62 (25.8%)] [OR 0.89 (CI 0.53-1.47), p = 0.65].
CONCLUSION: For slow-growing embryos, higher pregnancy outcomes were shown in early warming strategy as compared to the routine warming, which suggested that the improvement of endometrium-embryo synchronism may correct the time difference brought by the slow-growing embryos.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early warming; Endometrial receptivity; Frozen embryo transfer; Implantation window; Slow-growing embryo

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34746994     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-021-06321-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.344


  1 in total

1.  Clinical Outcome of Day-3 Cleavage Slow-Growing Embryos at Different Cleavage Rates after Overnight Culture: A Cohort Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Lan Geng; Xinran Lin; Rang Liu; Jiahui Wu; Yongsheng Luo; Hongmei Sun; Zhenhui Hou; Qiuju Zhang; Chang Xu; Xiao Li; Canhui Cao; Tianren Wang; Xi Xia
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.