| Literature DB >> 34746460 |
Benjamin D Thumamo Pokam1,2, Dorothy Yeboah-Manu2, Daniel Amiteye3, Prince Asare2, Prisca Wabo Guemdjom4, Nchawa Yangkam Yhiler1,5, Samuel Nii Azumah Morton6, Stephen Ofori-Yirenkyi6, Roger Laryea6, Roger Tagoe6, Anne Ebri Asuquo7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) and drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) continue to persist as a serious public health challenges in Ghana. Although several research has evaluated the drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBc) strains across the country, there is a paucity of data on its magnitude as well as the various lineages circulating in the Eastern region of Ghana.Entities:
Keywords: Cameroon sub-lineage; Eastern region; Ghana; MDR; Tuberculosis
Year: 2021 PMID: 34746460 PMCID: PMC8551511 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08152
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Sub-lineages distribution of the isolates in the Eastern Region of Ghana.
Distribution of genotypes, sublineages, spoligotypes international types (SITs) and spoligotypes patterns of 102 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates in the Eastern Region of Ghana.
| Lineages | Genotypes | Sublineages | SITs | Spoligotypes patterns | No. of isolates | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L2 (n = 1) | BEIJING | Beijing | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| L3 (n = 1) | EAI5 | EAI | 342 | 1 | 1 | |
| L4 (n = 59) | H3 | Haarlem | 1243 | 1 | 1 | |
| H3 | Haarlem | 50 | 4 | 3.9 | ||
| LAM9 | LAM | 42 | 3 | 2.9 | ||
| LAM10_CAM | Cameroon | 61 | 22 | 21.6 | ||
| LAM10_CAM | Cameroon | 772 | 3 | 2.9 | ||
| LAM10_CAM | - | 57 | 1 | 1 | ||
| LAM10_CAM | Cameroon | 838 | 1 | 1 | ||
| T1 | Ghana | 53 | 13 | 12.7 | ||
| T1 | - | 205 | 1 | 1 | ||
| T1 | Ghana | 393 | 1 | 1 | ||
| T1 | Ghana | 1166 | 5 | 4.9 | ||
| T1 | - | 1626 | 1 | 1 | ||
| T2 | UgandaI | 848 | 2 | 1.9 | ||
| T3 | - | 504 | 1 | 1 | ||
| L5 (n = 4) | AFRI | West African 1 | 330 | 1 | 1 | |
| AFRI_2 | West African 1 | 331 | 3 | 2.9 | ||
| Not classified | 37 | 36.3 | ||||
| Total | 102 |
Drug susceptibility patterns of the isolates in the study area.
| Drugs | MTBc n = 79 (%) |
|---|---|
| 26 (32.9) | |
| INH | 45 (57) |
| RIF | 29 (36.7) |
| ETH | 14 (17.7) |
| STR | 40 (50.6) |
| INH | 6 (7.6) |
| RIF | 1 (1.3) |
| ETH | 1 (1.3) |
| STR | 4 (5.1) |
| INH + RIF | 3 (3.8) |
| INH + ETH | 2 (2.5) |
| INH + STR | 11 (13.9) |
| RIF + STR | 2 (2.5) |
| INH + RIF + STR | 12 (15.2) |
| INH + RIF + ETH + STR | 11 (13.9) |
| 26 (32.9) | |
MTBc = Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex, INH = Isoniazid, RIF = Rifampicin, ETH = Ethambutol STR = Streptomycin.
MDR association between gender, age, sub-lineages and previously treated patients.
| Number of isolates tested n = 79 | Non-MDR-TB (%) n = 53 | MDR-TB (%) n = 26 | Odds Ratio (95% CI) | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.31 (0.44–3.92) | 0.624 | ||||
| Male | 58 | 38 (65.5) | 20 (34.5) | ||
| Female | 21 | 15 (71.4) | 6 (28.6) | ||
| <25 | 9 | 5 (55.6) | 4 (44.4) | 1.75 (0.43–7.14) | 0.467 |
| 25–34 | 13 | 8 (61.5) | 5 (38.5) | 1.34 (0.39–4.59) | 0.749 |
| 35–44 | 13 | 10 (76.9) | 3 (23.1) | 0.56 (0.14–2.24) | 0.528 |
| 45–54 | 21 | 14 (66.7) | 7 (33.3) | 1.03 (0.36–2.96) | 0.582 |
| 55–64 | 13 | 10 (76.9) | 3 (23.1) | 0.56 (0.14–2.24) | 0.528 |
| >64 | 10 | 6 (60) | 4 (40) | 1.42 (0.36–5.56) | 0.722 |
| Beijing | 1 | 0 | 1 (100) | - | 0.329 |
| Cameroon | 25 | 17 (68) | 8 (32) | 0.94 (0.34–2.59) | 0.920 |
| EAI | 1 | 1 (100) | 0 | - | 0.671 |
| Ghana | 11 | 6 (54.5) | 5 (45.5) | 1.87 (0.51–6.80) | 0.489 |
| Haarlem | 1 | 0 | 1 (100) | - | 0.329 |
| LAM | 1 | 1 (100) | 0 | - | 0.671 |
| UgandaI | 3 | 3 (100) | 0 | - | 0.547 |
| West African 1 | 6 | 5 (83.3) | 1 (16.7) | 0.38 (0.04–3.47) | 0.658 |
| West African 2 | 4 | 2 (50) | 2 (50) | 2.13 (0.28–16.0) | 0.595 |
| Undefined | 26 | 18 (69.2) | 8 (30.8) | 0.86 (0.32–2.37) | 0.777 |
| 0.89 (0.32–2.48) | 0.823 | ||||
| Newly diagnosed | 56 | 38 (67.9) | 18 (32.1) | ||
| Previously treated | 23 | 15 (65.2) | 8 (34.8) | ||