| Literature DB >> 34746300 |
Wei Wei1, Wenqiang Xin2, Yufeng Tang1, Zhonglun Chen1, Yue Heng1, Mingjun Pu1, Bufan Yang1, Jiacai Zuo1, Jingfeng Duan1.
Abstract
Stroke is an acute cerebrovascular disease, including ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Stroke is the second leading cause of death after ischemic heart disease, which accounts for 9% of the global death toll. To explore the molecular mechanisms of the effects of the dysregulated factors, in the GEO database, we obtained transcriptome data from 24 h/72 h of mice with ischemic stroke and 24 h/72 h of normal mice. We then performed differential gene analysis, coexpression analysis, enrichment analysis, and regulator prediction bioinformatics analysis to identify the potential genes. We made a comparison between the ischemic stroke 72 h and the ischemic stroke for 24 h, and 5103 differential genes were obtained (p < 0.05). Four functional barrier modules were obtained by weighted gene coexpression network analysis. The critical genes of each module were ASTL, Zfp472, Fmr1 gene, and Nap1l1. The results of the enrichment analysis showed ncRNA metabolism, microRNAs in cancer, and biosynthesis of amino acids. These three functions and pathways have the most considerable count value. The regulators of the regulatory dysfunction module were predicted by pivotal analysis of TF and noncoding RNA, and critical regulators including NFKB1 (NF-κB1), NFKBIA, CTNNB1, and SP1 were obtained. Finally, the pivotal target gene found that CTNNB1, NFKB1, NFKBia, and Sp1 are involved in 18, 32, 2, and 60 target genes, respectively. Therefore, we believe that NFKB1 and Sp1 have a potential role in the progression of ischemic stroke. The NFKB signaling pathway promotes inflammatory cytokines and regulates the progression of ischemic stroke.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34746300 PMCID: PMC8570099 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2464269
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Synergistic expression of differential genes between acute wound specimens and postoperative wounds on days 3 and 7. (a) The 14 coexpression panels obtained by clustering were identified as modules, and 14 colors represent 14 coexpression modules. (b) Expression heat map of all genes in the sample, whose expression behavior is clustered into 14 coexpression modules. (c) Each row represents a module, each column represents a phenotype, the color of each cell is mapped by the corresponding correlation coefficient, the value is from -1 to 1, the color transitions from blue to white, and then transitions to red.
Hub gene of modules.
| Color | Hudgens | Module |
|---|---|---|
| Blue | Astl | m4 |
| Brown | Zfp472 | m3 |
| Turquoise | Fmr1 | m1 |
| Yellow | Nap1l1 | m2 |
Figure 2Functional and pathway enrichment analysis excerpts of the module gene. (a) Module gene GO function enrichment analysis excerpt. The color increases from blue to purple, and the enrichment increases significantly. The larger the circle, the more significant the proportion of the gene in the module that accounts for the GO function. (b) Module gene KEGG pathway enrichment analysis excerpt. The color increases from blue to purple, and the enrichment increases significantly. The larger the circle, the more significant the proportion of the gene in the KEGG pathway entry.
Figure 3Regulatory effect of the regulator on the dysfunction module. (a) Orange circles represent modules and yellow circles represent ncRNA. (b) The green circle represents the module, and the purple circle represents the TF.