| Literature DB >> 34745150 |
Libing Zhu1,2, Yuning Wu3, Chenglong Lin1, Lin Tang4, Bin Yu4, Wenrong Wan5, Jingxiu Xuan6, Yanling Du7, Zhangran Chen8, Wei Liang3.
Abstract
A mixed Chinese herbal formula, Xiao-Qing-Long-Decoction (XQLD), may contribute to sustained remission in allergic rhinitis (AR), but it is unknown which factors determine such long-term effect. Here, we aimed to identify bacterial signatures associated with sustained remission. To this end, samples from AR patients at four different times were analyzed to compare the dynamic bacterial community and structure shifts. Diversity indices Chao1 showed significant difference across different time (p<0.05), and the Kruskal-Wallis test identified that Dialister (OTU_31), Roseburia (OTU_36), Bacteroides (OTU_22), Bacteroides (OTU_2040), and Prevotella_9 (OTU_5) were the significant differential bacterial taxa (p<0.05). These distinctive genera were significantly associated with the change of AR clinical indices and the predicted functional pathways such as PPAR signaling pathway, peroxisome, and citrate cycle (TCA cycle) (p<0.05), indicating that they may be important bacterial signatures involving in the sustained remission in AR (p<0.05). Besides, lower Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio at 6 months follow-up may also contribute to the long-term remission of AR. No seriously adverse events and safety concerns were observed in this study. In conclusion, XQLD is a meaningful, long-term efficient and safe medication for AR treatment. The underlying mechanisms of sustained remission in AR after XQLD treatment may be associated with the dynamic alteration of featured gut bacteria taxa.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA; Xiao-Qing-Long-Decoction; allergic rhinitis; gut microbiota; long-term remission
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34745150 PMCID: PMC8569905 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.774966
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Clinical characteristics of participants at different time points.
| Pretreatment | Post-treatment | 1 month follow-up | 6 months follow-up |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects (n) | 33 | 25 | 11 | 8 | ||
| Gender (Male/Female) | 17/16 | 15/10 | 8/3 | 2/6 | ||
| Age (years) | 27.30 ± 16.35 | 27.12 ± 16.71 | 23.64 ± 12.71 | 27.88 ± 16.23 | ||
| BMI | 20.72 ± 4.45 | 20.43 ± 4.26 | 20.26 ± 4.19 | 21.29 ± 5.69 | ||
| SPT (n) | Dust mite− | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | |
| Dust mite++ | 4 | 4 | 3 | 0 | ||
| Dust mite+++ | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | ||
| Dust mite++++ | 18 | 12 | 6 | 6 | ||
| TNSS | 8.30 ± 2.32a | 1.79 ± 2.32c | 2.64 ± 1.86c | 5.25 ± 3.15b | <0.001 | |
| Rhinorrhea | 2.09 ± 0.91a | 0.58 ± 0.74b | 0.55 ± 0.52b | 1.13 ± 1.13b | <0.001 | |
| Nasal congestion | 2.06 ± 0.90a | 0.67 ± 0.83b | 0.55 ± 0.82b | 1.13 ± 0.64b | <0.001 | |
| Nasal itching | 1.94 ± 0.97a | 0.58 ± 0.68b | 0.55 ± 0.69b | 1.38 ± 1.06a | <0.001 | |
| Sneezing | 2.21 ± 0.82a | 0.46 ± 0.68b | 1.00 ± 0.89b | 1.63 ± 0.92a | <0.001 | |
| RQLQ | 82.21 ± 32.15a | 18.03 ± 25.28b | 25 ± 29.07b | 46.38 ± 46.26b | <0.001 | |
| Activity limitation (AL) | 10.91 ± 3.80a | 2.69 ± 3.41b | 3.36 ± 4.67b | 6.38 ± 5.76b | <0.001 | |
| Sleep disorders (SD) | 7.70 ± 5.70a | 3.31 ± 4.72b | 3.00 ± 5.29b | 4.00 ± 4.87ab | <0.001 | |
| Non-eye/nasal symptoms (NES) | 18.61 ± 10.52a | 4.34 ± 6.33b | 6.82 ± 10.28b | 10.63 ± 13.45b | <0.001 | |
| Practical problem (PP) | 11.21 ± 4.85a | 2.82 ± 3.96b | 2.82 ± 2.68b | 5.13 ± 5.74b | <0.001 | |
| Nasal symptom (NS) | 15.12 ± 4.96a | 2.54 ± 3.78c | 4.09 ± 3.62c | 9.75 ± 6.23b | <0.001 | |
| Eye symptoms (ES) | 9.61 ± 6.57a | 2.41 ± 3.65b | 1.73 ± 1.68b | 5.50 ± 7.29b | <0.001 | |
| Emotions (EM) | 9.06 ± 4.80a | 3.11 ± 4.75b | 3.18 ± 3.76b | 5.00 ± 6.44b | <0.001 | |
| Percentage of EO | 5.27 ± 3.20a | 4.35 ± 2.45a | 5.39 ± 2.66a | 4.90 ± 3.81a | 0.54 | |
| EO counts (109/L) | 0.38 ± 0.36a | 0.13 ± 0.18a | 0.32 ± 0.16a | 0.37 ± 0.40a | 0.59 | |
| IgE(IU/ml) | 355.22 ± 540.87a | 379.42 ± 541.86a | 566.57 ± 671.24a | 198.46 ± 152.84a | 0.65 | |
| Cytokines (pg/ml) | IL-2 | 0.37 ± 0.59b | 0.80 ± 1.08a | 1.16 ± 0.83a | 0.00 ± 0.01b | <0.001 |
| IL-4 | 0.42 ± 0.91bc | 1.02 ± 1.32ab | 1.82 ± 1.55a | 0.08 ± 0.21c | <0.001 | |
| IL-6 | 1.83 ± 1.64a | 1.37 ± 1.74a | 2.18 ± 2.53a | 1.55 ± 1.22a | 0.9 | |
| IL-10 | 1.36 ± 1.27a | 1.10 ± 1.61a | 1.81 ± 1.4a | 0.87 ± 0.54a | 0.3 | |
| TNF-α | 0.33 ± 0.61bc | 1.36 ± 2.08ab | 1.56 ± 1.79a | 0.13 ± 0.18c | <0.001 | |
| IFN-γ | 0.46 ± 0.64b | 0.86 ± 1.09a | 1.27 ± 1.08a | 0.15 ± 0.12b | <0.001 | |
| Safety evaluation | ALT (U/L) | 23.85 ± 24.33 | 22.60 ± 23.49 | 21.82 ± 23.20 | 13.75 ± 5.23 | 0.68 |
| AST (U/L) | 22.27 ± 8.96 | 22.12 ± 9.91 | 20.45 ± 9.38 | 18.75 ± 5.63 | 0.78 | |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 4.16 ± 1.04 | 4.13 ± 1.02 | 4.14 ± 0.88 | 4.53 ± 0.93 | 0.80 | |
| CRE (umol/L) | 60.94 ± 20.53 | 61.84 ± 17.02 | 55.09 ± 15.04 | 48.13 ± 9.39 | 0.15 | |
| WBC (10^9/L) | 6.40 ± 1.98 | 6.07 ± 1.50 | 6.14 ± 1.50 | 7.29 ± 2.60 | 0.68 | |
| RBC (10^12/L) | 4.78 ± 0.46 | 4.79 ± 0.42 | 4.85 ± 0.36 | 4.84 ± 0.81 | 0.93 | |
| Hemoglobin (g/L) | 129.79 ± 20.78 | 135.56 ± 13.21 | 136 ± 12.78 | 122.75 ± 7.11 | 0.06 | |
| Platelet count(10^9/L) | 234.32 ± 70.23 | 231.84 ± 46.07 | 231.18 ± 51.44 | 253.88 ± 102.00 | 0.97 | |
| Hematocrit (%) | 40.45 ± 3.97 | 41.16 ± 3.21 | 41.2 ± 3.32 | 37.95 ± 1.77 | 0.09 | |
SPT is the abbreviation of skin prick test, which uses physiological saline as negative contrast, histamine as positive control, and dust mites drop as allergen. The result evaluation criteria were based on the rash caused by histamine, which means regardless of the size of the rash caused by histamine to pave +++, larger than the rash caused by histamine to pave the ++++, as large as the rash caused by histamine to pave the +++, smaller than the rash caused by histamine to pave the ++ or +, and negative for−. Letters (a, b, and c) indicate the difference grouping among different time points. Groups that do not share a common letter are significantly different.
Figure 1Changes in TNSS, RQLQ, EO%, EO counts, and cytokines at different time points based on Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05). (A) Changes in TNSS at different time points. (B) Changes in RQLQ at different time points. AL, Activity limitation; EM, Emotions; ES, Eye symptoms; NES, Non-eye/nasal symptoms; NS, Nasal symptom; PP, Practical problem; SD, Sleep disorders. (C) Changes in EO%, EO counts, and cytokines at different time points. EO# is the abbreviation of EO counts. Cytokines including IL-2, TNF-a, IFN-g, IL-4, IL-6, and IL-10. Letters (a, b, and c) indicate the difference grouping among different time points. Groups that do not share a common letter are significantly different.
Figure 2Comparison of bacterial diversity and composition at different time points (p<0.05). (A) The α diversity indexes comparison including Chao1, J, and Shannon. (B) Venn graph showing the shared and unique OTUs among different groups. The bacterial communities’ differences among different time points were reflected by PCoA plot (C) and NMDS (D). Letters indicate the difference grouping among different time points. Groups that do not share a common letter are significantly different.
Figure 3Comparison of gut microbiota at different time points. The bacterial phylum taxa (A) and genera (B) distribution pattern at different time points. (C) The distribution of significantly distinguished OTUs at different time points screened by Kruskal-Wallis test.
Figure 4Comparison of metabolic pathway at different time points and the association between featured bacterial taxa and the distinguished pathways that were screened based on Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05). (A) Comparison of these distinguished pathways between pretreatment and post-treatment groups. (B) The correlationship between the nine distinguished pathways and the 23 significantly differed genera screened by Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05).
Figure 5Correlation between distinguished bacterial taxa and TNSS, RQLQ, or cytokines based on Spearman’s correlation test (* means p<0.05; ** means p<0.01; *** means p<0.001.).