Literature DB >> 3474458

Incidence of prostate cancer and marital status.

G R Newell, E S Pollack, M R Spitz, J G Sider, J J Fueger.   

Abstract

Analyses were made of the marital status of 48,106 men with adenocarcinoma of the prostate, who were reported to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program of the National Cancer Institute during the 9 years ending in 1981. The hypothesis tested was that widowers and possibly divorced men were at higher risk for developing this cancer than were married men. Age- and marital-specific incidence rates were calculated for 4 age groups (45-54, 55-64, 65-74, and greater than or equal to 75 yr) for U.S. white, black, and Puerto Rico Hispanic men. Risks for other marital status groups were calculated relative to "married." Among the 45-54 age group, all ethnic groups had an excess risk for widowed as compared to the risk for married men [whites, relative risk (RR) = 1.7; blacks, RR = 1.5; Hispanics, RR = 2.5]. These excesses were not significantly different from unity. In the other 3 age groups and among each ethnic group, among whom 97.3% of all prostate cancers occurred, there was no suggestion of an excess risk for the development of prostate cancer among widowed men relative to married men. Unexpected findings were significant deficits in risk for single, separated, and divorced white men as compared to the risk for married men. Thus this study does not support an association between widowerhood and an increased risk for the development of prostate cancer. Additional studies are required to investigate a suggestion of decreased risk for older, separated, and divorced men.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3474458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  6 in total

1.  The experiences of unpartnered men with prostate cancer: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Meredith Wallace Kazer; Janet Harden; Matthew Burke; Martin G Sanda; Jill Hardy; Donald E Bailey
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2010-11-28       Impact factor: 4.442

2.  Marital status, indicators of sexual activity and prostatic cancer.

Authors:  C La Vecchia; S Franceschi; R Talamini; E Negri; P Boyle; B D'Avanzo
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Marital status and prostate cancer incidence: a pooled analysis of 12 case-control studies from the PRACTICAL consortium.

Authors:  Charlotte Salmon; Lixin Song; Kenneth Muir; Nora Pashayan; Alison M Dunning; Jyotsna Batra; Suzanne Chambers; Janet L Stanford; Elaine A Ostrander; Jong Y Park; Hui-Yi Lin; Olivier Cussenot; Géraldine Cancel-Tassin; Florence Menegaux; Emilie Cordina-Duverger; Manolis Kogevinas; Javier Llorca; Radka Kaneva; Chavdar Slavov; Azad Razack; Jasmine Lim; Manuela Gago-Dominguez; Jose Esteban Castelao; Zsofia Kote-Jarai; Rosalind A Eeles; Marie-Élise Parent
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Socio-economic and lifestyle factors associated with the risk of prostate cancer.

Authors:  T I Lund Nilsen; R Johnsen; L J Vatten
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Social determinants of prostate cancer in the Caribbean: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Catherine R Brown; Ian Hambleton; Shawn M Hercules; Nigel Unwin; Madhuvanti M Murphy; E Nigel Harris; Rainford Wilks; Marlene MacLeish; Louis Sullivan; Natasha Sobers-Grannum
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Magnitude and causes of mortality differences between married and unmarried men.

Authors:  Y Ben-Shlomo; G D Smith; M Shipley; M G Marmot
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.710

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.